The Base Is the One Part Nobody Sold You
The order acknowledgement for a 4.2 by 3.0 metre insulated garden office runs to four pages. Cladding profile, glazing configuration, the position of every socket, the colour of the EPDM, a delivery slot twelve weeks out. The base gets one line: level, dry, square, and ready on the day. Everything the customer is buying has been drawn; the only part they are actually responsible for building has not.
Meanwhile the garden falls about 700 millimetres from the back fence towards the house, which nobody noticed until a level went on it. The subsoil at spade depth is a stiff orange-brown clay that comes out in slices. A sycamore two gardens over throws its canopy across the fence line, and the only route from the road to the back is a side passage with an 860 millimetre gate and a step in it. None of that appears anywhere in the four pages.
The choice between a raft slab, concrete pads, a timber frame on ground screws and a proprietary steel base gets presented as a price list, and it is not one. It is a decision about how many tonnes have to be carried through that gate, how far the ground will move in a dry August, and — the question almost nobody asks until it is too late to matter — what the base can do about that movement in year three.
The Ground Is Not Being Asked to Carry Much
Add up what a garden office actually weighs and the number is smaller than the anxiety around it. A 12.6 square metre timber-frame building with an insulated floor cassette, 140 millimetre stud walls, a warm flat roof and a set of bifolds comes to somewhere around three and a half tonnes as it stands. Add the domestic imposed floor load from BS EN 1991-1-1 and its UK National Annex — Category A residential, because a garden office is a room in a house by any structural reading — and the total is roughly 50 kilonewtons, or about four kilopascals over the footprint. Put a 150 millimetre concrete slab underneath — near enough 45 kilonewtons of concrete on its own — and the whole assembly reaches roughly 100 kilonewtons, or a little under eight kilopascals.
Eight kilopascals is nothing. The figure people reach for as an allowable bearing pressure in the absence of a site investigation is 150 kilopascals — itself a placeholder rather than a measured value, and nearly twenty times what this building applies. That redirects the worry, which is the point of doing the sum: bearing capacity is almost never what limits a garden building. What limits it is seasonal ground movement, differential settlement across made ground, and the fact that a light, tall, closed box in an open garden is primarily a wind problem.
Run the arithmetic once anyway, because a number you produced yourself is harder to argue with than a rule of thumb. Enter the whole footprint as a single footing and the whole building weight as the load, and what comes back is the average contact pressure the ground sees. A real footing design checks each pad on its own and applies partial factors from BS EN 1997-1 or the equivalent, and the allowable value belongs in a geotechnical report rather than a default box — but for the question actually being asked, the average is the right first pass.
The one case where the number bites is soft ground, and gardens hide more of it than fields do: a filled-in pond, the spoil from a 1980s extension tipped over the lawn and turfed, ash and broken brick from a demolished outbuilding. Dig a 600 millimetre trial hole at two opposite corners before choosing anything. Made ground announces itself — brick fragments, coal, plastic, a sudden change of colour, sides that will not stand up — and water standing in the hole an hour later is telling you something too, though not about bearing.
Treat the whole footprint as one footing and the whole building as one load to see what the ground is actually being asked for — the answer is usually so far inside the allowable value that it moves the argument onto movement, where it belongs.
The total load carried by the footing.
The footing's length in plan.
The footing's width in plan.
The soil's allowable bearing capacity, from a geotechnical report.
Applied bearing pressure
2,660 psf
The pressure this footing puts on the ground is below the allowable bearing pressure shown with it — you entered it from a geotechnical report. Being under the allowable pressure is not the whole ground question: settlement, groundwater and the footings alongside are all untouched here.
- Footing area
- 42.25 ft²
- Allowable bearing pressure
- 3,132.82 psf
- Safety margin (allowable / applied)
- 1.18
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Footing Soil Bearing Pressure Checker: 2,660 psf — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Add the equipment this sizes
This result is a specification — 2,660 psf — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.
What this calculation does not cover
- BEARING CAPACITY IS NOT SETTLEMENT. A footing can sit comfortably inside the allowable pressure and still settle more than the structure will tolerate, and on a compressible clay the settlement check is usually the one that governs. Passing here is not permission to stop.
- Assumes the load is concentric and the pressure uniform. Any moment or eccentricity tilts the distribution, and once the resultant leaves the middle third the footing lifts along one edge and the peak pressure climbs far above the average this reports.
- The allowable pressure entered must already carry its geotechnical factor of safety. Entering an ultimate bearing capacity instead over-credits the ground by roughly a factor of three, and nothing here can tell the two apart.
- The footing's own structural design is not checked: punching shear, one-way shear and flexure size the concrete and the reinforcement, and a footing large enough for the ground can still be too thin for the column standing on it.
- Takes no account of adjacent footings whose stress bulbs overlap, of groundwater, of frost depth, or of an excavation planned alongside — each of which can change the allowable pressure without changing anything on this page.
Four Systems, and What Eliminates Each One
The four are not really competing on strength. Every one of them will hold up a garden office on decent ground. They compete on what the site throws at them, and each has one condition that rules it out entirely rather than merely making it awkward.
They also are not exclusive, which the sales literature tends to obscure. Most garden rooms as built are hybrids: a proprietary steel base standing on concrete pads, or a timber bearer frame sitting on ground screws, or a slab poured only under the half of the footprint that is in cut. Reading the table below as four boxes to tick misses the useful move, which is to take the levelling method from one column and the support method from another.
| Base type | Where it earns its place | What rules it out | Material through the side gate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground-bearing raft slab | Firm ground with little fall, heavier or masonry-clad buildings, and anywhere a hard floor is wanted in its own right | More than about 300 mm of fall, tree influence on shrinkable clay, or no barrow route | Highest — sub-base and concrete, both bought by the tonne |
| Concrete pads and timber bearers | Gentle falls, staged DIY work, and sites where spoil can stay put | Deep made ground, heave-prone clay near trees, pads too shallow to reach undisturbed soil | Moderate — bagged or site-mixed concrete, one hole at a time |
| Timber frame on ground screws | Steep falls, root protection areas, wet ground and tight access | Buried obstructions and services, or hard fill that stops a screw short of depth | Lowest — steel and timber only, nothing wet |
| Proprietary steel base frame | Fast programmes, sloping plots, and suppliers who sell base and building as one package | Cost, and the fact that it still needs pads or screws under its feet | Low, but heavy and awkward — sections that two people must carry |
Trees, Clay and the Depth Nobody Wants to Dig
On a shrinkable clay, a tree is a pump. Through a dry summer its roots draw moisture out of the soil and the clay shrinks; through the winter the profile recovers and swells again. The movement is vertical, seasonal and not small — it is the mechanism behind most domestic subsidence claims in clay regions, and it does not care that the building above it is a garden office rather than a house.
What governs the response is documented and worth reading rather than guessing at. NHBC Standards Chapter 4.2 Building near trees sets foundation depths from three inputs: the volume change potential of the soil, banded by its modified plasticity index; the water demand of the tree species; and the ratio of the tree's distance from the building to its mature height. BRE Digest 298 The influence of trees on house foundations in clay soils covers the same ground with the reasoning attached. Classification and plasticity testing follow BS 1377, or ASTM D2487 and ASTM D4318. None of it produces a depth without the plasticity index and the species, and no article can supply either from a distance.
The depths those tables produce for a house are frequently deeper than a garden building justifies, and that collision has only three honest exits. Move the building outside the influence zone, which is usually cheaper than any engineering. Choose a system that tolerates movement and can be corrected — adjustable screw or pad heads, a timber frame that can be re-shimmed with a spanner in year three. Or accept that a shallow base near a mature tree on clay will move seasonally and detail for it: independent of the house, door gaps set generously, services in flexible runs. What is not honest is a 150 millimetre slab cast six metres from a mature poplar and described as engineered.
The tree may also have standing of its own. BS 5837 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction gives the root protection area, and where the tree carries a Tree Preservation Order or stands in a conservation area, work inside that area is a consent question before it is a construction one. Screws or hand-dug pads under an arboricultural method statement are often accepted inside an RPA where a slab is not — but that is the tree officer's call, made in advance.
Taking the Fall Out Before Anything Else
Seven hundred millimetres of fall across 4.2 metres is a one-in-six slope, and it has to go somewhere. Cut into the bank and you win a level platform at the cost of a retained face, drainage behind it and several cubic metres of spoil with nowhere to go. Build up and you are asking a filled platform to behave, which it will only do if the fill goes in as controlled layers and is compacted, with density checked against a Proctor reference to ASTM D698 or D1557 or the BS 1377 equivalent. Cut half and fill half is the usual answer and the one that keeps the spoil on site. What you must not do is set pads or a slab edge on uncompacted fill; it consolidates under its own weight for a season or two whatever sits on top of it.
For a slab or a pad base, the layer doing the real work is the sub-base: an unbound granular mixture, what UK merchants sell as MOT Type 1, specified against Series 800 of the Specification for Highway Works and graded to BS EN 13285, or a dense-graded crushed aggregate base in North America. It is compacted in layers a hand-guided plate can actually reach, which is thinner than the depth people tip in one go. Two 75 millimetre lifts, each compacted, beat a single 150 millimetre lift that has been walked on.
Order it by weight rather than volume, because that is how it is sold and the two numbers differ. Suppliers quote compacted densities for crushed stone base across a range — commonly 1,700 to 2,100 kilograms per cubic metre depending on gradation — so a 15 square metre platform at 150 millimetres compacted is between 3.8 and 4.7 tonnes, four to six bulk bags. In a garden with no vehicle access that is fifty-odd barrow loads through the gate before a single bag of cement moves.
Two details earn their keep underneath it. A separation geotextile between a soft or clayey formation and the stone stops fines pumping up into the base, which on wet clay is not optional. And the sub-base should run 150 to 300 millimetres past the footprint on every side, so the slab edge or the outer pads are not standing on the very edge of the compacted material with nothing to confine it.
Take the platform area including the overhang past the footprint, the compacted thickness, and the density your own supplier quotes for the material they are actually sending — the tonnage is what you order and the barrow count is what you live with.
The total area to be covered with gravel base.
The target compacted thickness of the base layer.
The in-place density of the base once it is compacted.
Gravel base needed
73.8 tons
Actual density varies by material gradation and compaction — confirm with your supplier's specific product density for a precise order quantity.
- Volume
- 39.81 yd³
- Equivalent in US (short) tons
- 73.82 tons
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Gravel Base Layer Tonnage Calculator: 73.82 tons — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- This is a take-off, not a pavement design. It multiplies out whatever compacted thickness you enter; nothing here derives that depth from traffic loading, subgrade strength, drainage or frost depth, which come from a pavement design or your local road authority's standard.
- Geometry is a flat plan area at one uniform depth. Crown and cross-fall, a formation that steps between thicknesses, a dig that deepens where the subgrade was soft, and edge thickening or haunching at the perimeter all fall outside area x thickness.
- No waste, spillage or subgrade-loss allowance is applied. The figure is the exact in-place mass, so stone lost into a soft or uneven formation, over-excavation, haul and spread losses, and the tail end of a part-load all sit on top of it.
- The density field is an in-place compacted density. A supplier's loose bulk density and a weighbridge ticket carrying free moisture are different quantities, and substituting either moves the tonnage: the wetter the delivered material, the less dry stone a given delivered weight puts on the ground.
- It covers one layer of one material. A base and sub-base of different gradations, a bedding or blinding course, and the geotextile or separation membrane between stone and subgrade are not counted here.
The Slab, If the Garden Allows One
A raft slab under a garden room is not a driveway with walls on it. Done properly it is a layered assembly, and every layer is a separate quantity bought a separate way — stone by the tonne, fabric and membrane by the roll, insulation by the board, concrete by the cubic metre. That is four suppliers and four delivery problems, against a screw base that is one pallet.
Specify the concrete rather than ordering 'concrete'. BS 8500-1 gives designated mixes for exactly this: a GEN-series mix for an ordinary domestic slab, and the FND designations where BRE Special Digest 1 Concrete in aggressive ground puts the site in a sulfate or acid class that demands them — brownfield gardens, made ground and some natural clays all reach that threshold. Where ACI documents govern, ACI 332 and ACI 360R cover the same decisions. Fabric reinforcement to BS 4483 controls cracking rather than carrying load, and only does that if it is on chairs at the right height rather than pulled up by boot after the pour has started.
Then there is the arithmetic that decides whether the slab happens at all. That 4.2 by 3.0 metre footprint at 150 millimetres, with a modest thickened edge, is about 2.2 cubic metres — five and a quarter tonnes of wet concrete. Through a wide gate onto a drive, that is a ready-mix delivery and a comfortable morning. Through an 860 millimetre side passage with a step, it is roughly forty barrow loads of material that sets whether you are ready or not, or a pump and its hose run, or close to two hundred bagged mixes — a 25 kilogram bag yields about 0.0125 cubic metres, so 2.2 cubic metres is a pallet and a half of them. The choice between a slab and everything else is very often made right here, and it is a logistics decision wearing a structural coat.
Whatever the route, buy for the hole you actually dug. A sub-base that dips 20 millimetres over a 12 square metre slab is a quarter of a cubic metre of extra concrete, and concrete is the one material on the job that cannot wait while somebody goes for more.
The raft, from formation upwards
- Concrete slab with thickened edge — the structural layer and the finished floor in one, ordered by volume against the sub-base you actually achieved rather than the one on the sketch Concrete Calculator
- Damp-proof membrane — a continuous sheet lapped and taped, turned up at the perimeter and never punctured by a chair leg or a stray reinforcement bar Vapor Barrier Calculator
- Under-slab rigid insulation — boards laid between the edge thickenings, chosen for compressive resistance under load as well as for thermal performance Foam Board Insulation Calculator
- Compacted sub-base — unbound crushed stone placed in layers a hand-guided plate can reach, extended past the slab edge on every side Gravel Base Layer Tonnage Calculator
- Separation geotextile — keeps the clay fines out of the stone, which is what stops a good sub-base turning into a bad one over a wet winter
- Undisturbed formation — the surface everything above is trusting; topsoil, roots and soft made ground all have to come off it first Footing Soil Bearing Pressure Checker
Slab length, width and thickness give the volume and the bag count — raise the waste allowance to match how flat your sub-base honestly is, because the shortfall on a garden slab is always found halfway through the pour.
SettingsSettings for this calculation
The standard allowance most suppliers and estimating guides assume for ordinary work.
The length of the slab or footing.
The width of the slab or footing.
How deep the concrete pour is.
Extra concrete for spillage, uneven subgrade, and forming imprecision.
Estimated concrete needed
1.358 cubic yards
- Volume (no waste)
- 1.23 yd³
- Volume with waste factor
- 1.36 yd³
- Cubic feet
- 36.67 ft³
- 80 lb bags needed
- 62 bags
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Concrete Calculator: 1.36 cubic yards — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- Geometry is one rectangular prism: length x width x a single uniform thickness. Thickened edges, integral footings, haunches, steps, curbs and any non-rectangular outline are not in the figure, and nothing is subtracted for block-outs or openings. Take those off as separate volumes and add them.
- It assumes a flat, compacted subgrade sitting at exactly the depth you entered. Ruts, soft spots, over-excavation and a base that dishes in the middle all take concrete the geometry never sees, and a flat waste percentage is not a measurement of that. On a rough base, check depth across the whole pour rather than trusting the allowance.
- This is a volume take-off, not a structural decision. It accepts whatever thickness you type without sizing it, and says nothing about mix strength, aggregate size, air entrainment, fibre, or rebar and mesh. Slabs carrying vehicles, footings, and anything supporting a structure are a code and engineering question.
- The bag count assumes an 80 lb (36 kg) bag yields about 0.6 cubic feet (17 litres) of mixed concrete, and rounds up to whole bags. Real yield shifts with the product and with how much water goes in, and no other bag size is converted for you.
- The volume is not an order quantity. Ready-mix is sold in fixed increments with a minimum load and its own short-load charges, and concrete left in the drum, the chute or the pump line is not counted. The waste factor covers spillage and forming slop, not the plant's ordering rules.
Code thresholds this tool can check
Code thresholds this tool can check
Checked for United States. Each check below names the body that published the limit it uses. Switching market re-runs them. This is not a code review and has no official standing.
These checks cover only the specific numeric limits listed below. They are not a complete code review: fire separation, egress, structural capacity and accessibility provisions are outside their scope, and only the handful of local amendments offered in the selector are modelled — your municipality may have others. Passing every check here does not make a design compliant. Final approval rests with your local building authority.
WITHIN LIMIT — Concrete floor slabs on ground: minimum 3.5 in (89 mm) thick.
Slab thickness 4.00 in meets the 3.5 in IRC floor-slab minimum. Expansive soils are handled separately under IRC R403.1.8, and any slab carrying vehicles or point loads should be designed rather than taken from the code minimum.
ICC · IRC R506.1
Pads: Count Them From the Bearers, Not the Perimeter
A pad base carries point loads, so the count follows the framing rather than the outline. A garden room floor cassette spans between bearers; the bearers span between pads; the pads sit on ground. Work inwards from that. A 3.0 metre wide building on 145 millimetre joists will normally want three bearer lines rather than two, and a pad under each end and at intervals along each line — which is a different number from anything the perimeter alone produces.
The perimeter figure is still worth having as a floor to check against, because it catches the base drawn with four pads at the corners and nothing in between. A standard residential deck spacing of six to eight feet along the beam line, applied to the perimeter, gives the minimum count an ordinary beam can bridge. Take it as exactly that: a lower bound from a spacing convention, which knows nothing about your interior bearer lines or the span table for the timber you are actually buying.
Pad size, though, is not set by bearing at all — the second section already showed the soil barely notices. It is set by three practical things: enough plan area to take a bearer with its packers and its fixing without any of it overhanging, enough depth to get through topsoil and made ground onto undisturbed material, and enough depth again to sit below whatever seasonal movement the site has. On ordinary non-shrinkable ground in the UK, 450 millimetres is the usual minimum starting point; where ground freezes, IRC Section R403.1 requires footings below the frost line; and near trees on clay, the tables in the previous section govern and run deeper than either.
Feed it the building footprint and the beam spacing to get the perimeter minimum, then add the interior bearer lines yourself — a garden room floor is not a deck and it rarely gets away with a perimeter-only pad layout.
The length of the deck.
The width of the deck.
The maximum spacing between footings along the beam line.
Minimum footings needed
8 footings (minimum)
Footing count and placement are structural and code-critical — this is a rough planning estimate only. Always verify final footing count, size, and depth (including frost depth) against your local building code or a structural engineer before digging.
- Perimeter beam length
- 49 linear ft
- Footings along each long side
- 3 footings
- Footings along each short side
- 3 footings
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Deck Footing Calculator: 8 footings (minimum) — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
What this calculation does not cover
- COUNTS FOOTINGS ALONG A PERIMETER, and says nothing about how big each one has to be. Footing SIZE comes from the load each post carries — its tributary area of deck, plus live load — divided by the soil's bearing capacity, and a deck on soft ground needs the same number of much larger pads.
- Spacing is driven by the BEAM, not by the perimeter: how far a beam can span between posts depends on its size, species and grade and on how much deck it carries, and that span is what should set the spacing entered above rather than a habit.
- Frost depth governs how deep every one of them goes, and it is a local figure. A footing at the right size and the wrong depth lifts the deck every winter and drops it every spring.
- Assumes a rectangular deck supported around its perimeter. A deck ledgered to the house carries much of its load on that ledger and needs fewer footings on that side but a correctly flashed and bolted ledger instead — which is the connection that fails most often on a deck.
- Stairs, cantilevers, hot tubs and any point load need their own footings sized for what they carry, and none of them are in this count.
Filling the Holes Without Buying Twice
Pad holes swallow more concrete than anyone estimates by eye, because a hole is a cylinder and cylinders grow with the square of the diameter. A 300 millimetre auger hole 600 deep holds 0.042 cubic metres, and across nine holes that is 0.38 of a cubic metre. Take off what a 100 millimetre post displaces and it comes back to about a third of a cubic metre — around thirty-three 20 kilogram bags, two-thirds of a tonne, arriving on a pallet that will not fit through the gate and has to be split on the drive. Bracket-mounted pads displace almost nothing, so on those the gross figure is the one to buy against.
That is also the number that decides between bagged mix and site mixing. Below about ten bags, buy bags. Above forty, a mixer with ballast and separate cement is cheaper, faster and gives control over consistency across the pours — which matters, because pads cast at different water contents on different afternoons set to different strengths, and it is the weakest one that finds out first.
Two site habits are worth stating. Dry-pouring bagged mix into a hole and wetting it afterwards is a method some manufacturers publish for fence posts and others explicitly do not — follow the bag, because the ones that permit it also specify how. And do not cast a bracket into a hole with 50 millimetres of slurry in the bottom; bail it, and if it refills faster than you can bail, you have learned something about the water table that changes the base type rather than the pour.
Hole diameter, depth, post size and count, with the bag size you are actually buying — it deducts what the post displaces, which is the correction people leave out and then wonder why the last hole is short.
Diameter of the augered hole.
Depth of the hole.
Width of the post, to deduct its volume.
How many holes.
Bag you are buying.
Concrete required
0.475 yd³
Geometry with the post volume deducted. Bag yields are nominal and vary with the mix and how wet it is made.
- Per hole
- 0.05 yd³
- Bags required
- 39 bags
- Post displacement deducted
- 0.08 yd³
- Cubic yards
- 0.48 yd³
- Approximate weight
- 1,923.49 lb
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Post Hole Concrete Calculator: 0.4755 yd³ — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- Frost depth governs where ground freezes and overrides any rule-of-thumb embedment. Check the local requirement.
- Soft or made ground needs a wider or deeper footing than these proportions suggest; overturning resistance comes from the soil, not the concrete.
The Timber Frame That Sits on Top
Above pads or screws sits a bearer frame, and its geometry comes from the floor above rather than from a rule. Garden room cassettes are typically 45 by 145 joists at 400 millimetre centres with insulation between and an 18 millimetre deck over, and the bearer spacing is whatever that joist section can span at those centres for the species and grade being used. Look it up in the span tables for the timber you are buying; do not inherit a spacing from a shed.
A runner layout gives the starting count — runners at roughly 600 millimetre centres across the width, each running the full length of the building, which for a 3.0 metre width comes out at six. That is a sensible default for a light structure with a conventional deck, and it is a default: a heavier build, a wider span, a stone-clad wall or a green roof all pull the spacing in, and the honest way to settle it is the span table rather than the convention.
Durability is where garden room bases quietly fail, and it fails at the timber-to-ground interface every time. Anything within splash range of the soil needs ground-contact treatment — Use Class 4 under BS EN 335, preserved to the retentions and penetrations in BS 8417, or UC4A under AWPA U1 where that system applies. The trap is that the treated timber most merchants stock for decking is a lower use class, suitable for above-ground exposure and nothing else, and it looks identical. Check the tag, then keep the timber off the ground anyway: a DPC pad or bracket between bearer and concrete, a ventilated gap under the floor with airflow that actually crosses it, and no soil or bark mulch banked against the frame after the landscaping goes in.
Width and length give the runner count and the length of each — a starting layout for a light timber building, to be checked against the span table for the joist section you are actually buying rather than accepted as it stands.
The width of the shed, across which skids are spaced.
The length of the shed, which sets each skid's length.
Skids needed
6 skids
This assumes a standard 2 ft (0.61 m) skid spacing suitable for typical small-to-mid-size sheds — larger sheds or heavier floor loads may need closer spacing or a different foundation type (concrete piers or a full slab) per your local code.
- Length of each skid
- 12 ft
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Shed Foundation Skid Calculator: 6 skids — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- The count comes from the Shed Width field alone — width decides how many runners, while length only sets how long each one is — so typing the two dimensions the other way round returns a different number of skids, and the layout takes it for granted that the floor joists cross the runners rather than sitting parallel to them.
- Skid size is never chosen here: there is no entry for a 4x4 against a 4x6, or for species and grade, so the beam depth carrying the floor between its bearing points, and the joist span across the gap between runners, still have to be sized on their own.
- Ground preparation sits outside the answer entirely — the gravel bed beneath the runners, its depth and footprint, the levelling work, and any blocks or pads the skids rest on are none of them counted, and the result behaves as though the ground is already flat and draining.
- Each skid is reported at exactly the shed's length, with no overhang past the floor frame for skidding or blocking, no cutting allowance, and no rounding to a stock beam length, so a runner that lands between sizes is still bought at the next length up and a shed longer than the longest beam available needs a splice this figure does not reveal.
- Nothing in the result holds the building down: the fasteners between the floor frame and the runners, and any tie-down against wind uplift or sliding, are separate from how many skids lie underneath, and a shed on skids rests on the ground rather than being fixed into it.
Screws, Piles, and the Difference the Brochures Blur
Two different products get sold under overlapping names. A helical pile is a steel shaft with one or more helical bearing plates, installed by a machine that measures torque; in North America the family is covered by ICC-ES AC358 Acceptance Criteria for Helical Pile Systems and Devices, with capacity confirmed by load testing to ASTM D1143 or ASTM D3689. A garden room ground screw is usually a shorter proprietary tube with a coarse thread or a single flight, and its capacities come from the supplier's own test data rather than that acceptance criteria. Both work; they are not interchangeable, and a capacity table for one says nothing about the other.
Where torque is measured, the industry method is a straight correlation: ultimate capacity is the installation torque multiplied by an empirical factor, Kt, published for the specific shaft. Kt falls as shaft diameter rises, varies between manufacturers, and is a property of the product rather than of the soil — which is why the value has to come off the data sheet for the shaft actually in the ground. It estimates ultimate capacity, so a factor of safety still applies before it becomes a working load.
Run one screw's numbers and the shape of the problem becomes obvious. A garden room corner might be asked for five to ten kilonewtons; a modest screw at a modest torque with a typical Kt produces an ultimate capacity several times that even before the safety factor. Capacity is almost never the binding constraint on this kind of building. Depth is — whether the screw can get down at all.
Refusal is the real risk in a garden. Old foundations, a demolished coal bunker, hardcore under what used to be a path, a Victorian soakaway, roots as thick as your arm: installers hit all of these routinely. A screw that stops at 600 millimetres in shrinkable clay near a tree has not reached anywhere useful — it is inside the zone that moves seasonally, and that is the base that presents two Augusts later as a door that no longer closes. When a screw refuses, the answer is the supplier's written rule for the situation, not a shrug.
Before any of it, scan for services and hand-dig the starter positions; gardens are full of unrecorded runs. And note that a screw's tension capacity is a different published number from its compression capacity, usually smaller — which matters, because on a light building it is the tension case that governs.
Final installation torque and the manufacturer's published Kt for that exact shaft give the estimated ultimate capacity — the number a factor of safety is then applied to, and the number a site load test exists to confirm on anything that matters.
The average torque recorded during the final few feet of installation.
The empirical torque correlation factor for your specific shaft.
Estimated ultimate capacity
35 kips
Torque correlation is an empirical estimate, not a substitute for load testing on critical projects — it's most reliable when the site soil is reasonably uniform and the specific Kt factor has been validated for similar conditions.
- Equivalent in lbs
- 35,000 lb
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Helical Screw Anchor Pull-Out Capacity Calculator: 35 kips — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Add the equipment this sizes
This result is a specification — 35 kips — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.
What this calculation does not cover
- This returns ultimate capacity, not a working load. No factor of safety is applied and nothing here compares the figure against the load on the pile — dividing ultimate capacity down to an allowable capacity is the engineer's step, not this calculator's.
- Torque correlation describes the soil, not the steel. The shaft's tensile strength, the coupling bolts, the helix plates, and buckling of the shaft in compression through soft or organic soil can all govern below the soil capacity returned here, and the smaller of the two controls the pile.
- There is no input for embedment depth, helix diameter or helix count. The correlation assumes the helices are deep enough below grade to fail in deep bearing; an anchor without adequate cover over the top helix fails by shallow cone breakout at less than this figure, which is exactly the direction a pull-out anchor is loaded in.
- The figure reflects only the soil the anchor was turning through over the last short stretch of installation. A weaker stratum above the helices, uncontrolled fill, a perched water table, seasonal moisture change, closely spaced anchors interacting as a group, and long-term creep under sustained tension in soft clay are all invisible to a torque reading.
- This is a field verification estimate, not a foundation design. It does not size the pile, check lateral or overturning loads, address frost depth, adfreeze or corrosion over the service life, and it does not replace the load testing and stamped engineering that permitting authorities generally require for helical foundations.
A Light Building Is a Wind Problem
Once the base is level, the remaining structural question is not whether the building will sink but whether it will lift, slide or rack off. The dead load of a timber garden room is small enough that the net uplift on a shallow-pitch roof, plus the overturning moment on a tall closed box with a large glazed face, can approach or exceed it in an exposed garden. Wind actions come from BS EN 1991-1-4 with the UK National Annex, or from ASCE/SEI 7 — and in both, local exposure, topography and the height of the surrounding boundary do more to the answer than the regional wind speed does.
Ground anchor kits are sold against a perimeter spacing convention — roughly six-foot intervals around the outside is the figure most commonly quoted — and that convention is a starting layout, not a wind calculation. It says nothing about the anchor's capacity in your particular soil, which is the manufacturer's published and strongly soil-dependent figure, and nothing about your particular exposure. Treat the count as the minimum to plan for and the manufacturer's instructions as the thing you follow.
The anchor is also only as good as the load path above it. A strap into the ground with nothing continuous between it and the roof is decoration; the chain has to run from anchor or screw head into the bearer, the sole plate, the wall panel and the roof structure, with a real mechanical connection at every step. Detail the metalwork for a wet environment while you are at it — hot-dip galvanized coatings to BS EN ISO 1461 or ASTM A123, hardware to ASTM A153 — and keep the fastener metallurgy compatible with what it is bolted to, because a galvanized base plate with the wrong screws through it corrodes at the one place nobody can inspect.
Perimeter and target spacing give the anchor count from the conventional layout — the number to plan the kit around before checking it against the anchor manufacturer's own instructions and the exposure of the site.
The total perimeter of the shed's base.
The maximum spacing between anchors.
Ground anchors needed
8 anchors
Wind exposure, shed size, and local code all affect the actual required anchor count and spacing — check your specific anchor kit's manufacturer instructions and your local building code before finalizing.
- Shed perimeter
- 43 ft
- Anchor centres round the shed
- 5.38 ft
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Shed Anchor Kit Calculator: 8 anchors — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- The count is the perimeter cut into equal bays and rounded up, with no floor under it and no anchor set aside for the corners where uplift concentrates: at the default 6 ft spacing, a shed of 18 ft perimeter or less comes back as three anchors, fewer than the building has corners.
- Rounding up tightens the real interval rather than leaving a short last bay, and that finished figure is never shown — the default 13.2 m perimeter at 6 ft spacing returns eight anchors sitting about 5 ft 5 in apart, while the only line under the answer repeats the perimeter in feet.
- Perimeter arrives as a single number, so a long narrow shed and a square one of the same girth get an identical answer, and there is no input for the door opening or a ramp — an anchor point that lands on a threshold has to be shifted by eye.
- Nothing about the anchor or what it goes into reaches the division: auger length, rated withdrawal capacity, the strap or cable that ties the anchor back to the frame, and whether the ground is soft clay, loose sand or backfill all leave the number unchanged.
- The answer is loose anchors rather than packs, so it is not divided into the kit sizes these are sold in and it carries no spare for an anchor that meets a rock or a root and has to be relocated.
- The spacing box stops at 3 m, a little under 10 ft, and the perimeter box at 100 m, so a kit rated for wider intervals or a building bigger than that cannot be entered as it stands.
Working Backwards From the Delivery Slot
Garden room installers arrive with a two-person crew and a day booked. If the base is not right they either build on it anyway or they leave, and both outcomes are expensive. The acceptance criteria are usually level within a few millimetres across the footprint, square on the diagonals, and the correct plan dimensions — which are the base dimensions from the drawing, not the building dimensions, and on some systems those differ by the thickness of the cladding.
Sequence the weeks backwards from that date rather than forwards from enthusiasm, and put curing in as a real duration. Concrete gains strength on its own schedule, and a slab poured the weekend before a Monday delivery has not finished doing anything.
- Dig the trial holes and settle the base type before the building is ordered — that is the one decision the garden makes for you.
- Get the tree question answered in writing where there is a preservation order or a conservation area; the answer can rule out an excavation entirely.
- Confirm the base dimensions and the levelness tolerance with the supplier, including whether they want the base at finished floor level or below it.
- Check the diagonals before any excavation and again on the finished base — 15 millimetres out of square is found by the wall panels, not by the tape.
- Count the barrow loads for sub-base and concrete separately, and assume the gate halves the rate.
- Photograph every hole at final depth with a tape in frame, and keep the screw torque log if there is one; it is the only record of what is under the building.
Take the garden's own numbers into the workspace
Six things decide the base, and five of them are measured in the garden rather than read off the order form. Carry them together, because changing one changes the others.
- Fall across the footprint, both ways — Levels at all four corners and the middle, taken with a level and a straightedge rather than by eye — the number that decides cut, fill or step before it decides anything else.
- Trial hole record at two opposite corners — Depth to undisturbed material, what came out of the topsoil and made ground, whether water stood in the hole an hour later, and the depth and thickness of any roots.
- Tree survey line — Species, distance and mature height for anything within reach, plus whether it is protected — this is what sends you to the NHBC tables or lets you off them.
- Access constraint in barrow loads — Gate width, steps and route length converted into trips for sub-base and for concrete, counted separately; it is the number that usually eliminates the slab.
- Bearer and pad layout, not just the outline — The interior bearer lines from the floor span table, with a pad or screw at every bearing point — the perimeter count is a floor, never the answer.
- Hold-down load path, written down — Anchor or screw head through bearer, sole plate, wall panel and roof, with the fixing named at each step and the metalwork specified for permanent ground exposure.
Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.
