A published average cost per square metre is wrong for almost every real project, and wrong in a direction nobody can predict from the page: labour rates move by region and by month, access and substrate condition swing preparation more than the finish material does, and the quantity you need is the one part that can actually be calculated. So these pages say which side of the cost is structural — where labour dominates, where the hidden layer is, which option punishes a bad substrate — and leave the number to your quotes.
What each page is specific about instead: the failure mode of each option, what the substrate or the climate rules out before preference matters, the maintenance the choice commits you to, and the situations where one side simply cannot be used. Where a figure varies by jurisdiction, the page names what governs it rather than publishing a number that would be wrong somewhere.
Once the decision is made, the calculators give you the quantity, the trade guides cover the site work around it, and the methodology pages show the mathematics if you want to check the arithmetic yourself. To price both options properly, run each through Project Builder and compare two complete estimates rather than two unit rates.
These are guidance rather than specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the manufacturer’s instructions govern wherever they differ, and several of the choices here are structural decisions that need signing off rather than looking up.