Failure diagnostics

Why did it go wrong

Every calculator on this site answers “how much”. These pages answer the question that comes after the work, when something has failed.

Each page takes one symptom as somebody would actually describe it and sets out the candidate causes in the order they most often turn out to be the answer — each with the observation that separates it from the others, because a list of possibilities without a way to tell them apart is not much use. Then what to check and in what order, the calculations that relate, and plainly where to stop.

None of it is a diagnosis. Nobody here has seen your building, and a page that spoke with confidence about it would be guessing in a way that sounds like knowledge.

  • 60Symptoms
  • 360Candidate causes
Start here if it might be structuralWhen to call an engineerCracking in a load path, a sagging beam, a bulging wall, a leaning retaining wall, a floor that bounces. 11 symptoms that get no causes list and no checklist here, because whether something is still carrying its load cannot be answered from a description — with what each looks like, why it is structural, and how soon to act.

One from each shelf

60 symptoms

Finishes

Paint, plaster, screed and tiling. Most of these are a bond or a moisture problem, and the failure surface usually says which.

Services

Electrics and drainage. These are the symptoms where the first useful question is which device or which fixture, because that identifies what was detected.

Damp and the building envelope

Where water and cold surfaces meet. Three unrelated problems look alike on a wall, and the remedy for one does nothing for the other two.

Why these pages do not tell you what is wrong

Because they cannot, and the ones that claim otherwise are the reason this section is written the way it is. A symptom that looks identical in two buildings can have unrelated causes, and the information that separates them — where exactly it is, when it started, what the weather was doing, what is behind the surface — is with the reader rather than with us. So every cause here carries the observation that distinguishes it, and the useful work is done by whoever is standing in front of the wall.

The other half is knowing where to stop. Every page ends with what takes it out of a reader’s hands, and the structural symptoms get no causes list at all. That is not caution for its own sake: an incorrect diagnosis of a structural problem is expensive when it leads to unnecessary work and dangerous when it leads to none.

Where a cause comes down to a quantity — a thickness, a mix ratio, a bay size, a circuit load — the page links the calculator that computes it, with its formula and the standard behind it. That is the loop this site can close and most cannot: the calculation that would have prevented the failure is one click from the failure.