What it is called, by market
One concept, four markets. Where a name means something else locally, the card says so rather than leaving you to find out on site.
United Kingdom
Close, not identicalsoakaway
also soakage pit, infiltration crate, rubble soakaway
Covers both the traditional stone-filled pit and the modern modular crate system, which hold very different volumes of water per volume of excavation.
Australia
Close, not identicalsoakwell
also soak well, absorption trench, leach drain
Soakwell normally means a precast concrete or polymer chamber rather than a filled pit, and is a standard stocked product in a way the British equivalent is not.
United Statesyours
Same word, different thingdrywell
also dry well, seepage pit, infiltration trench, French drain
French drain is the trap: in American usage it frequently means a perforated pipe in gravel that CONVEYS water elsewhere, which is a different job from dispersing it into the ground.
Canada
Close, not identicaldrywell
also soakaway pit, infiltration gallery, sump
As the United States, with frost depth a governing constraint that milder markets do not have to design around.
The governing standard, by market
United Kingdom
BRE Digest 365 / Approved Document H3
Soakaway design, including the percolation test method and the storage volume calculation.
United States
ASTM D3385 / local stormwater manuals
Infiltration rate of soils using a double-ring infiltrometer, and jurisdiction-specific sizing rules.
Calculators for this
Each works in either measurement system, and the terminology on the page follows whichever market you have selected.
Frequently asked questions
- Why does a soakaway need a percolation test rather than a rule of thumb?
- Because the soil is the whole design and it varies enormously over short distances. A soakaway has to store the water that arrives during a storm and release it into the ground before the next one, so its size is set by two numbers: the volume arriving, which comes from the roof or paved area and the design rainfall, and the rate the ground accepts it, which comes from a test. That rate can differ by a factor of a hundred between a sandy gravel and a clay, and it can differ substantially between two corners of the same garden. The test — BRE Digest 365's method fills a pit three times and times the fall from 75% to 25% full — exists because that number cannot be guessed. A soakaway sized without it is either several times bigger than needed or useless, and the useless case is the one that shows up as a flooded lawn.
- How much water does a rubble-filled pit actually hold?
- Around a quarter to a third of its own volume, which is the fact that surprises people pricing one. Water is stored in the VOIDS between the stones, not in the stones, so a pit filled with clean single-size aggregate stores roughly 30% of the excavation — meaning a soakaway needing three cubic metres of storage needs about ten cubic metres of hole. Modern modular crates exist precisely because of that arithmetic: they are around 95% void, so the same storage fits in a little over three cubic metres of excavation, and on a constrained site that difference decides whether a soakaway is possible at all. The trade is cost per unit and the need for a silt trap upstream, because a crate cannot be dug out and washed the way a stone pit theoretically can.
- Where can a soakaway NOT go?
- Close to a building, close to a boundary, in ground that is already wet, and above certain things. British guidance keeps them a minimum distance from any structure — commonly five metres — because the whole purpose of the thing is to put water into the ground, and putting it next to a foundation is putting it under the foundation. They cannot work where the water table rises into them seasonally, which is why a test done in August and a soakaway used in February can disagree completely. They are restricted over contaminated ground, in groundwater protection zones, and where infiltration could destabilise a slope. The commonest real-world failure is none of these: it is a soakaway discharging into ground that was disturbed and backfilled during the build, which behaves nothing like the ground that was tested.
