Two winters, and the outer nail line let go
The job that is worth starting from was a garden room clad in 145 mm larch shiplap over 25 mm battens at 600 centres, fixed in November with two ring-shank nails through every board at every batten because one nail felt mean. The boards had spent three weeks in a heated unit and a meter pushed into a fresh end read eleven per cent. By the second August, every third board on the south elevation had a split running down from the outer nail, the faces had cupped enough to throw a shadow, and a run of nail heads stood proud of the surface. Nothing about the wall behind had failed. The membrane was sound, the base was clear, the water had never got in.
What happened is that the boards took up moisture until they reached equilibrium with the outside air, went from eleven per cent to something in the mid-teens, and tried to get wider. Two nails through one board into one batten is a clamp: the board cannot slide, so the growth turns into compression across the width, the compression relieves itself at the weakest point, and the weakest point is the hole with a nail shank in it. The tight joints between boards had nowhere to give either, so the boards levered against each other and cupped. Every one of those failures was a decision made months earlier, on paper, about a millimetre and a half of movement nobody had calculated.
So this is a guide about four dimensions and the order to settle them in: how far the board will move, how deep the cavity behind it needs to be, what size and spacing the battens have to be to hold that cavity and carry the wind, and how much gap to leave at every joint and every fixing so the board can do what it is going to do anyway. The layers behind the batten — membrane, laps, flashings at openings, the base termination — are the drainage-plane job, and how that plane is built and lapped is set out in the guide on installing siding rather than repeated here.
The wall in section, turned on its side, base of wall at the left
- Timber boards — the only layer on the wall that changes size after it is fixed, which is why its joints and its fixings are drawn as gaps rather than as contacts Siding Calculator
- Battens and the cavity they hold open — structure, not packing — they carry every wind load the boards collect back to the frame, and their depth is the cavity depth Rain-Screen Cladding Furring Strip Calculator
- Breather membrane — the surface the cavity drains down, dressed out at the base so what it collects leaves in front of the wall rather than behind it House Wrap Calculator
- Sheathing or racking board — what the batten fixings pass through on their way to the frame, and the reason a batten screw length is not the same as a board nail length Plywood and OSB Sheet Calculator (Subfloor, Wall and Roof)
- Sole plate and studs — the members every batten fixing has to actually reach, which is what fixes the batten centres you are allowed to choose from Framing Stud Calculator
How far the board is going to move, and in which direction
Cross-grain movement is arithmetic, not weather lore. Below the fibre saturation point a board changes width in proportion to its width, to the change in its moisture content, and to a coefficient that belongs to the species and to how the board was sawn. The USDA Forest Products Laboratory Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, tabulates those coefficients species by species in both directions, and gives the equilibrium moisture content a piece of wood reaches at a given temperature and relative humidity. Everything else in this section is those two tables applied to a wall.
Two numbers decide the answer and both of them are measurements, not assumptions. The first is the moisture content the boards are at when you fix them, which takes a minute with a resistance meter pushed into a freshly cut end away from the surface. The second is where they will settle, and for a board on the outside of a building in a temperate maritime climate that is somewhere in the mid-teens, swinging several points between a wet February and a dry August. BS EN 335, Durability of wood and wood-based products — Use classes, is the document that describes that exposure; Eurocode 5, BS EN 1995-1-1, describes the same thing from the structural side as service class 3. What matters on site is that the delivered figure and the in-service figure are rarely the same, and that the sign of the difference tells you which failure you are designing against.
Boards delivered dry — out of a heated store, off a kiln schedule aimed at joinery, or simply stacked indoors over a warm month — will swell. That is the case with no forgiveness in it, because swelling has nowhere to go except into compression, and compression comes out as cupping, as a split from a restrained fixing, or as a whole elevation that bows off the battens. Boards delivered wet — air-dried stock, a pack that sat uncovered in the yard, green oak or chestnut by intention — will shrink, and shrinkage is the visible failure rather than the structural one: joints open, tongues pull clear of grooves, a shiplap rebate that looked tight in March shows daylight and the black of the membrane behind it in July.
Sawing pattern is the other half of the coefficient and it is worth asking the supplier about. A flat-sawn board moves across its face at the tangential rate, the larger of the two; a quarter-sawn board moves at roughly two thirds of that and cups far less, because the growth rings run through the thickness rather than around the face. Dense hardwoods move considerably more than construction softwoods in both directions. Where the pack is mixed and nobody can tell you how it was cut, take the tangential figure — the price of being conservative is a slightly wider gap that nobody will ever notice.
| Board face width | Movement across the width | What that does to the detail |
|---|---|---|
| 100 mm (4 in) | about 1.0 mm (0.04 in) | Small enough that two fixings per batten survive it, which is why narrow boards forgive bad habits |
| 145 mm (5¾ in) | about 1.5 mm (0.06 in) | Past the point where a second fixing on the same batten does anything except restrain the board |
| 175 mm (7 in) | about 1.8 mm (0.07 in) | Open joints widen and narrow visibly through the year; set the gap for the wet end of the swing |
| 200 mm (8 in) | about 2.1 mm (0.08 in) | A restrained board relieves the stress by splitting from the nail, usually inside two seasons |
| 250 mm (10 in) | about 2.6 mm (0.10 in) | Wide enough that cupping rather than dimensional change becomes the failure people see |
Enter the board's face width as the cross-grain depth and leave the level count at one — this is a single member, not a stacked frame. Run it once with the meter reading you took at delivery and once with the reading you expect the wall to settle at; the sign of the answer tells you whether you are designing a gap for swelling or a lap for shrinkage.
The summed depth of horizontally laid timber the load path passes through at one level.
The meter reading taken on the timber at the moment it was fixed in place.
Where the timber will settle once the building is finished and running.
The fraction of its depth the timber moves for each single point of moisture change.
How many platform-framed levels the movement accumulates through.
Cross-grain movement at one floor level
0.2749 in
Straight arithmetic on the coefficient and the moisture change entered. The movement is across the grain; along the grain the same change moves the timber by a small fraction of this and is normally ignored.
- Accumulated movement over all floor levels
- 0.82 in
- Depth remaining once the movement has happened
- 11.48 in
- Movement for a single point of moisture change
- 0.03 in
- Change in moisture content
- 9 %
- Proportion of the depth lost
- 2.34 %
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Timber Cross-Grain Shrinkage Calculator: 0.2749 in — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Add the equipment this sizes
This result is a specification — 0.2749 in — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.
What this calculation does not cover
- Movement across the grain only. Timber moves along the grain by a small fraction of this, and a long member's length is effectively stable.
- Says nothing about whether the movement will be RESTRAINED. A member free to shrink simply shrinks; the split the guide describes happens when two rigid fixing lines hold a deep section apart while it tries to move, and that is a detailing question this arithmetic cannot answer.
- Uses one coefficient for the whole stack. Where the plates, the rim and the joists are different species or different sawing patterns, run them separately and add the results.
- Ignores creep, mechano-sorptive movement under sustained load, and any moisture cycling. A detail that dries, wets and dries again does not simply return to where it started.
Battens are structure, and their depth is the cavity
A batten does three separate jobs and gets specified as though it did one. It holds the cavity open, it carries every wind load the cladding collects back into the frame, and it provides the thickness the board fixing has to bury itself in. Those three jobs pull the section in different directions: the cavity wants depth, the wind load wants a fixing schedule back to the studs, and the nail wants enough timber past its point that it is not splitting a 19 mm strip from behind. A 50 × 25 batten and a 38 × 38 batten are not interchangeable just because both are called battens.
Batten centres are set by the board, not by the frame. A board spans between battens and has to do it at the design wind pressure for that elevation without deflecting enough to open a joint or work a fixing loose, which is why thin boards want tighter centres and why the centres that suit a 22 mm board are optimistic under a 16 mm one. Cladding suppliers publish span tables against board thickness and wind zone; that table is the source, and the number on it has to then land on something structural. Battens fixed into sheathing alone are a common shortcut and a bad one — the load path for wind suction runs board, batten, batten fixing, stud, and a fixing that stops in 9 mm of OSB has ended that path early.
Treatment is where garden-room work gets caught. A batten sits inside a ventilated cavity, out of the rain but subject to condensation and to whatever runs down the membrane, and BS EN 335 use class 2 is the usual minimum specification for it, with use class 3 where the detail is more exposed. BS 8417, Preservation of wood — Code of practice, describes how that is achieved and what has to happen to a batten cut on site: a cut end is untreated timber unless somebody brushes it. Treated battens also change the fastener conversation, because the preservative chemistry attacks some coatings.
- Read the board's span table for its thickness at your wind zone, and take the batten centres from that rather than from the stud spacing you happen to have.
- Check the centres you now want land on studs; where they do not, add battens rather than stretching the span, or fix a horizontal counter-batten grid that does land.
- Set the batten depth from the cavity requirement and the board fixing penetration together, taking whichever is deeper.
- Confirm the batten fixing reaches the structural member through the sheathing and any membrane, and that its length was measured from the face of the batten, not from the face of the sheathing.
- Specify the batten's preservative treatment level and brief the crew to treat every site cut before it goes on the wall.
How deep the cavity is, and how much of each end is actually open
The cavity behind timber cladding is doing something the same cavity behind a fibre cement or a masonry skin is not asked to do: it is drying the back face of a material that swells. A board coated on the front and open at the back, with still air behind it, dries asymmetrically and cups towards the drier face. Air movement in the cavity is what keeps the two faces closer together in moisture content, and it is also what carries away the water that ran down the back of the board after wind drove rain through an open joint. Depth and openness are therefore not a code box to tick; they are the mechanism by which the board stays flat.
The depth itself is a specification question with a real answer and no universal number. BS 8605-1, External timber cladding — Part 1: Method of specifying, is the document that sets out how to state it, and cladding system literature commonly asks for something around 25 mm behind vertical battens, deeper where a counter-batten grid is involved. Treat that as the figure to confirm against the system in front of you rather than the figure to carry from the last job — and note that whatever depth you choose has to survive the fixings, because a batten pulled tight over a bulge in the membrane or a proud sheathing edge has locally no cavity at all.
What actually decides the ventilation is not the gap you left but the free area remaining after the insect screen. Openings at the base and at the head both need mesh, both need it in a material that will not corrode into the cavity, and the aperture is a trade-off nobody escapes: coarse enough to pass water and debris, fine enough to keep insects out. A perforated vent strip or a mesh closure typically passes only a fraction of its gross area, and the gap that looked generous when the battens went on measures small once that percentage is applied. Do that arithmetic before you close the base, because the fix afterwards is taking boards off.
Take the vent height times the run at the base, add the same at the head, and enter that as the gross area alongside the rated open-area percentage of the mesh you have specified. What comes back is the figure to compare against the airflow your system literature asks for, and the figure to reach for again if somebody proposes a finer aperture halfway through the job.
The gross open area of the vent gap at the wall's top and bottom terminations.
The fraction of the vent product's gross area that is actually open to airflow.
Net free ventilation area
12.9 ft²
Open-area percentage varies by specific vent strip or mesh product — check the manufacturer's rated free-area percentage rather than assuming a generic value.
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Rain-Screen Cladding Ventilation Net Free Area Calculator: 12.92 ft² — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
What this calculation does not cover
- The cavity itself, not the vent strip, is often the restriction. A narrow gap, insulation bulging into it, or horizontal blocking and fire cavity barriers crossing it will throttle airflow well below whatever the end openings are rated to pass, and no amount of extra free area at the terminations fixes an obstructed cavity.
- A manufacturer's free-area rating is for a clean product. Mortar droppings, sealant, paint overspray and site dust blind a mesh or perforated strip without changing how it looks, so a base vent left open through the wet trades can be delivering a fraction of the area calculated here.
Every horizontal interruption starts a new cavity
A ventilated cavity is only continuous until something crosses it, and on a real elevation several things do: a closure at a window head, a cill flashing, a change of cladding direction or material, and — where the building's height, use or boundary position calls for it — a cavity barrier. Each of those is a new floor for water running down the back of the boards, and a floor with no outlet is a gutter with the ends welded shut. Every interruption needs its own discharge below it and its own inlet above it, counted along the run the same way a line of weeps is: an opening at centres, plus one at each end, plus an extra wherever the flashing stops or changes direction.
Two cavities get confused on extensions, and it is worth being explicit about which one you are counting. Where timber cladding on battens goes over an existing masonry cavity wall, the masonry cavity has its own trays and its own weeps discharging through the outer leaf, and the cladding cavity sits in front of that with its own separate set of outlets. Blocking one to serve the other is how a tray ends up discharging into a batten void. And the fire question is separate again: in England, Approved Document B requires concealed spaces to be closed at their edges and subdivided, which is what puts cavity barriers into a cladding cavity in the first place, while regulation 7(2) of the Building Regulations restricts combustible materials in the external walls of certain relevant buildings above eighteen metres — a different world from a single-storey garden room, but the reason the question is now asked on every job. Proximity to a relative boundary also changes the surface classification the cladding itself has to meet, and that one does catch garden buildings.
Run it once per interrupted length — the base of the wall, then each cill line, closure or barrier above it — using the outlet spacing your closure product allows. It counts the uniform openings and reminds you to add more at the ends and above every opening, which is exactly where a short count goes wrong.
The total length of cavity/veneer wall base needing weep holes.
The on-center spacing between weep holes.
Weep holes needed
18 weep holes
The plus-one term already places a weep at each end of this run, so do not add two more by hand — and where elevations meet, counting each run separately books the shared corner position twice. What is NOT counted: weeps above every door and window head, at shelf angles, and at any other flashing discontinuity, each of which needs its own row at this spacing.
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Cavity Wall Weep Hole Spacing Calculator: 18 weep holes — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- One straight run along one flashing line, and nothing above it. Every cavity tray higher up the wall — over each lintel, at each cill, under each shelf angle, at every roof abutment — is a separate drainage compartment needing its own weeps in the course directly above its own flashing, and none of those openings are in this figure.
- Nothing here checks the spacing you typed against the code you build under. The field accepts 406 to 838 mm (16 to 33 in), which is the North American band; British practice is tighter, commonly around 450 mm centres, and other markets differ again. This is arithmetic on the figure you enter, not a verdict that the figure is permitted.
- The weep itself is outside the model — opening size, free area, and whether the type you have matches the spacing you chose. Wick and tube weeps move far less water than an open perpend, and cellular inserts and insect screening cut free area below the raw size of the hole, so the same count of openings is not the same drainage capacity.
- Position decides whether any of them work and position is not counted. Weeps belong in the perpends of the course immediately above the flashing, formed as the bricks go back; one course too high and water sits permanently below its own outlet, and an opening with a mortar dam behind it drains nothing while still counting here.
- Vents are not in this number. Openings at the head of a drainage compartment — under soffits, under shelf angles, immediately below each cavity tray — are what let the cavity dry rather than merely drain, and they are a second set of openings on top of the ones counted here.
One fixing, or two, and where it goes
This is the decision the opening story turned on. A board fixed once per batten can move; a board fixed twice per batten across its width cannot, and the movement it was going to make happens anyway, as a split from the fixing that lost. The working rule that follows from the movement table above is that a single fixing line per batten is the default for anything with a face width past roughly 125 mm, placed so the board is pinned at one point and free everywhere else. Two fixings are defensible on narrow boards, where the movement is small enough that the timber can absorb the restraint, and they become necessary on wide boards in high wind — at which point the correct move is a narrower board, not a second nail.
Where the single fixing goes depends on the profile, and the logic is always the same: fix through the part of the board that is not trying to move relative to something else. On a lapped or feather-edge board the nail goes above the lap, through the upper board only, clear of the board beneath so the two are not stitched together. On shiplap the fixing sits in the face below the rebate. On tongue-and-groove the fixing is secret-nailed through the tongue at an angle, which pins the board and leaves the groove free — and which also means a board damaged three courses up cannot be lifted out without breaking something. Boards fixed through both leaves of a lap are the single most common cause of splitting on otherwise well-built cladding, and it is invisible until it is not.
End distances and pre-drilling matter more here than anywhere else on the wall. Eurocode 5, BS EN 1995-1-1, sets minimum nail spacings and end and edge distances along with the conditions under which pre-drilling is required — characteristic density above a threshold being the main trigger, which is why oak and chestnut get pre-drilled as a matter of course and softwood often does not. Pre-drill the last fixing at each end of every board regardless of species; it takes seconds, and it is the fixing most likely to be near a knot, a check or a cut end.
Fastener metallurgy is not a preference here. Oak, sweet chestnut, western red cedar, Douglas fir and larch all carry acidic extractives that react with iron, and the reaction produces a black stain that bleeds down the board from every head and cannot be sanded out. Austenitic stainless is the answer — the higher-alloy grade near the coast, the standard grade inland — and Eurocode 5 tabulates a minimum corrosion protection for fasteners by service class that puts an external cladding board where stainless stops being an upgrade and becomes the specification. Hot-dip galvanised hardware to ASTM A153, Standard Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware, is a floor for some assemblies and inadequate against tannin. Geometry matters as well: ring-shank fasteners to ASTM F1667, Standard Specification for Driven Fasteners: Nails, Spikes, and Staples, keep their withdrawal capacity through the seasonal cycling that works a smooth shank loose.
Vertical boarding, and the batten that covers the joint
Board and batten is the profile that solves the movement problem by design, and it is worth understanding why rather than copying the pattern. The wide under-boards are fixed with a single central row of fixings, so each one is pinned at its centreline and free to grow or shrink symmetrically about it. The cover batten is then fixed through the gap between two under-boards, into the framing behind, never through the under-boards themselves. Get that wrong — one nail through the cover batten into each of the boards it covers — and you have built exactly the clamp described at the top of this article, with the added indignity that the split is hidden under the batten until the batten falls off.
The gap between under-boards is a design dimension, not a fitting tolerance. It has to be wide enough that a swelling board does not close it and start lifting the batten, and the cover batten has to be wide enough that a shrinking board does not pull its edge out from under the batten and open a line straight through to the membrane. Board-on-board is the same logic with a wider overlap instead of a batten, and it is more forgiving of shrinkage for exactly that reason. Either way the arithmetic starts with how many boards fit across the wall and how many cover pieces that implies, and the answer is one more cover piece than boards, because the outer edges each need one as well as every seam between.
Vertical boards also change what the cavity needs. Battens for vertical boarding run horizontally, and a horizontal batten laid flat on the membrane dams the cavity: water runs down, meets the batten, and sits. The fix is a counter-batten grid — vertical counter-battens first, horizontal battens over them — which restores the drainage path and the vent path and costs a second layer of timber and a deeper cavity. Notching or shimming a horizontal batten is the shortcut, and it is the detail that gets skipped when the programme tightens, on the elevation where it matters most.
Enter the wall width and the under-board width to get the board count and the cover count for one elevation. The count it returns is a starting layout — most crews then split the leftover width between the two end boards rather than leaving one narrow board at a corner, which is a decision to make on the drawing rather than on the scaffold.
The total width of wall to be sided.
Centre-to-centre spacing of the boards: the board face width plus the gap the batten covers. For butted boards with no gap, this is simply the board width.
Boards needed
24 boards
- Battens needed
- 25 battens
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Board and Batten Siding Calculator: 24 boards — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- Adds one batten per wall run, which double-counts every corner on a whole house. A wall of N boards is closed with a batten at each end as well as one over each seam, so four walls come back with eight end battens where four corner boards cover the four corners between them. Take one off each wall that turns into another rather than stopping at a return.
- Batten width is never asked for and does not fall out of the module you enter. A batten has to cover the gap plus a bearing on the edge of each board either side — half an inch a side is the usual minimum — because vertical boards shrink across the grain in dry weather and pull out from under a batten cut to the gap alone. Too narrow and a line of daylight opens down every joint in the first dry spell.
- Gable ends and openings both break the assumption that a counted board is a full-height piece. On a gable every board stops at a different point on the rake, and above and below a window the boards become short cuts taken out of full stock that will not reach the next opening. The count across the wall stays right; the number of full-length boards to buy does not.
Buying it: the face width is not the cover width
Timber cladding is quoted by the linear metre or the square metre of a profile, and the trap is which square metre. A 145 mm shiplap board covers noticeably less than 145 mm once the rebate is engaged; a feather-edge board covers its width minus the lap you chose; tongue-and-groove loses the tongue. Ordering off the net wall area at the face width leaves a job short by whatever percentage the profile takes back, and it is a percentage large enough to matter over a whole building. Get the net area first, then divide by the cover width rather than the face width to get linear metres, and only then start adding for waste.
Waste does not behave like waste on a sheet product either. Random-length packs need a cutting plan or they generate offcuts too short for anything; fixed-length packs waste at every wall whose length is not a multiple of the board. Boards with a defect — a loose knot on a face that will be seen, a split end, a shake — get downgraded to short pieces rather than binned, which recovers material only if somebody keeps a rack of them on the scaffold. Take gables and dormers off separately, because angled offcuts on a vertical-boarded gable are almost never reusable.
One more line that gets forgotten: if the boards are being coated on all four faces and both ends, the coating quantity is against roughly double the area you would price from the elevation, and it has to be bought and applied before the boards go up rather than after.
This takes the door and window openings off the elevation for you. Take the starting figure from the net wall area on the breakdown rather than from the headline, because the headline has already applied the waste percentage — the field will not go below five — and the order above adds waste of its own. Divide that net area by the profile's cover width, not its face width, and keep both numbers on the order so nobody later prices the coating off the wrong one.
SettingsSettings for this calculation
The standard allowance most suppliers and estimating guides assume for ordinary work.
The total perimeter of exterior walls to be sided.
The average height from foundation to eave.
Doors aren't sided over.
Windows aren't sided over.
Extra siding for cuts and corners.
Estimated siding needed
12.51 squares
- Net wall area
- 1,137.46 sq ft
- Openings subtracted
- 162.54 sq ft
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Siding Calculator: 12.51 squares — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
What this calculation does not cover
- Every door is deducted at a fixed 1.95 m² (21 ft²) and every window at 1.4 m² (15 ft²), so a sliding patio door, a garage opening or a floor-to-ceiling window is taken off the total as though it were an ordinary one.
- Openings are subtracted in full, which assumes courses stop cleanly at each frame — in practice panels are cut around a window and the short offcuts often cannot be used anywhere else on the wall.
- Wall area is a single rectangle of your perimeter multiplied by one average height, so gable triangles, dormer cheeks, bay projections and a wall that grows taller across a sloping lot register only to the extent you have already folded them into that average.
- The waste allowance is one flat percentage applied to the finished area, and the field accepts nothing outside 5-20%, with no term in the arithmetic reacting to the number of outside corners or to how much of each panel length is lost where wall runs are short.
- The answer is a coverage area rather than a count of panels or boxes: exposure, panel length and the overlap between courses play no part in it, so convert the figure using the coverage printed on the product you actually order.
- Should the openings you enter add up to more than the gross wall area, the net is held at zero rather than flagged, and the confidence rating stays high for every combination of inputs, so a mistyped count returns a quiet answer rather than a warning.
Coat the back before it goes on the wall
A board coated on the face and bare on the back is two different materials stuck together. The coated face resists moisture exchange and the bare back does not, so the two faces sit at different moisture contents through every wet and dry cycle, and a board whose two faces are at different moisture contents cups. That is the whole mechanism, and it is why coating literature and the maintenance regimes published with it assume the board was treated on all four faces and both ends before it was fixed. End grain takes up water at many times the rate of a face and is the first place a board starts to go; the cut ends made on site are the ones nobody treats.
Leaving the timber uncoated is a legitimate specification, not a failure to decide — western red cedar, larch, oak and sweet chestnut are all specified to silver, and BS EN 350, Durability of wood and wood-based products, is where the natural durability classification behind that choice comes from. But an uncoated board takes up water faster and swings further through the year than a coated one, which feeds straight back into the gap you set at every joint. The finish decision and the movement allowance are one decision, made at the same time, and made before the boards are cut.
Two numbers to write down on the day
Almost every dispute about split or cupped cladding is a dispute about moisture content, argued a year later with no evidence on either side. The two numbers that settle it cost a minute each: the meter reading on the pack when it arrived, and the meter reading on the boards on the day they went up, both taken on a fresh cut away from the surface and both written down with the date. Add the gap you actually set at the joints and the air temperature you set it at, because a gap measured on a cold morning and a gap measured in August are different gaps on the same wall.
Then walk the base before the scaffold moves. The mesh should be open along its whole length and clear of the ground, offcuts and droppings should be out of the cavity rather than sitting on the base closure, and every discharge above a cill or a barrier should be findable from outside. A cavity that is drained on the drawing and blocked on the wall behaves exactly like one that was never drained at all — the only difference is that everybody believed it was fine.
Settle the movement first, then order off it
Every quantity on a timber cladding job is downstream of one measurement — the moisture content the boards are at when they go up — so take that first and let the rest of the take-off follow it.
- Moisture content at delivery and at fixing — Two meter readings on a fresh cut, dated. They set the gap, and they are the only evidence that exists if a board splits.
- Board linear metres at cover width — Net wall area divided by the profile's cover width, never its face width; add gables and dormers as separate cutting problems.
- Batten linear metres and their fixings — Centres come from the board's span table at your wind zone, then have to land on studs; counter-battens double the run on vertical boarding.
- Board fixings, in stainless, by count — One fixing line per batten on anything wide, so the count is boards × battens crossed, not boards × two × battens.
- Cavity closures, mesh and discharges — Base, head, and every cill, closure or cavity barrier that interrupts the run — each interruption is a separate count.
- Coating for four faces and both ends — Roughly double the elevation area, bought and applied before the boards reach the wall rather than after.
Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.
