Acoustics

Stopping Impact Noise Between Floors

A gym going in over occupied offices: what a floating sports floor can reach, what an isolated ceiling has to finish, and what neither of them touches.
  • 14 minReading time
  • 8Sections
  • 4Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

Level Three Is a Gym Now and Level Two Is Still Accountants

The lease is signed, the demolition is done, and the fit-out drawings show a functional training zone over the north-east corner, four lifting platforms along the core wall, and a studio whose first class starts at six fifteen. Underneath all of it, on a lease with four years left to run, sits a full floor plate of tenanted offices that nobody is moving out. The building is a 1990s steel frame, long bays, composite deck on cellular beams, and the floor-to-floor dimension is generous enough that the ceiling void below looks like an opportunity until you measure what the sprinkler main and the ductwork have already taken out of it.

The complaint, when it arrives, will not arrive at the gym. It goes from the tenant to the landlord and from the landlord to whoever signed the fit-out contract, and by then the rubber is down and the rig is bolted through it. So the arithmetic is worth doing while the floor is still a drawing: two chances to interrupt the path, one above the structure and one below it, and after that only demolition.

Impact noise is not a leak, and treating it like one wastes a fortnight. Airborne separation between those two floors was settled decades ago by whoever poured the deck, and it is probably fine. What a dropped dumbbell does is put energy straight into the structure, below the finish, with no air path in front of it to seal and no mass on your side — the slab is not shielding the offices, it is the thing conducting the sound to them. That reframing changes what you buy: nothing about sealant, nothing about board layers on their own, everything about interrupting a mechanical connection.

The three impact sources a floor over an office has to survive, and which of them anyone actually tests
SourceWhat defines itWhat it stands in for
Standard tapping machineISO 10140-5 for the equipment; ISO 10140-3 in the laboratory, ISO 16283-2 and ASTM E1007 in the fieldLight, rapid, repeated footfall — dominated by the mid and upper frequencies
Heavy or soft impact source (rubber ball)ISO 10140-5, applied in the field through ISO 16283-2A heavier, softer strike with much more low-frequency content than the hammers make
A dropped free weightNo standard source reproduces itItself. It is predicted by analogy and confirmed by dropping one
The three impact sources a floor over an office has to survive, and which of them anyone actually tests

Two Interventions With a Slab Locked Between Them

Everything you can do divides cleanly into work above the structural deck and work below it, and the two are not alternatives. A floating floor stops the impact from reaching the deck at full strength; an isolated ceiling stops whatever did reach the deck from radiating into the room below. They act in series on the same path, which is why a specification that buys one of them generously and the other not at all tends to disappoint in a way that is hard to argue about after the event.

Draw the build-up before pricing it, because the drawing settles arguments that words do not. Six bands, top to bottom, and each of them is a separate order line with a separate lead time — the wear surface, the platform deck, the resilient layer, the deck you were given, the isolation grid hung under it, and the boarded ceiling the office tenant looks at.

The floor and the ceiling under it

A gym floor and the office ceiling beneath it, cut through in six bands: the rubber wear surface, the plywood platform carrying it, the resilient pad the platform floats on, the existing structural deck, the isolation clips and furring channel hung under that deck, and the boarded ceiling the tenant below sees.
  1. Rubber wear surface — the layer the operator chose for grip, cleaning and how it looks in the photographs, which is not the layer doing the acoustic work
  2. Plywood platform — spreads a point impact across the resilient layer instead of punching through it, and is what a lifting platform is actually built from Plywood and OSB Sheet Calculator (Subfloor, Wall and Roof)
  3. Resilient pad — the interruption itself, bought by area against the court plus trim waste, and useless anywhere it is pinned through to the deck Sports/Athletic Floor Underlayment Pad Calculator
  4. Structural deck — the one band nobody is replacing, with a span and a mass that already decide how the whole floor responds to a rhythmic load Floor Beam Vibration Natural Frequency Calculator
  5. Isolation clips and furring — carries the ceiling below on a resilient element rather than on a rigid hanger, and is counted in clips before it is counted in metres Resilient Clip & Furring Channel Screw Count Calculator
  6. Boarded ceiling below — usually two layers rather than one, and its sheet count and its weight both have to clear the load the clips are rated for Ceiling Plasterboard (Gypsum Board) Sheet Calculator

What the Frame Is Already Doing on Its Own

Before any resilient product is priced, find out what the existing floor does when thirty people land on it together. A resilient layer interrupts the high-rate, high-frequency part of an impact very effectively and does almost nothing to the low-frequency structural response, so a long-span composite floor whose fundamental frequency lands on one of the first few harmonics of a class instructor's cueing tempo will still hand the offices below a rhythmic pulse through a perfect mat. This is a structural finding, not an acoustic one, and it changes the brief rather than the material list.

AISC Design Guide 11, Vibrations of Steel-Framed Structural Systems Due to Human Activity, is the document that treats rhythmic occupancy as its own load case rather than a variant of walking, and it is the reference to put in front of the structural engineer when the tenant fit-out plan first shows a studio. Outside North America the equivalent conversations run through SCI Publication P354, Design of Floors for Vibration: A New Approach, and through CCIP-016, A Design Guide for Footfall Induced Vibration of Structures, for concrete framing. Human response is assessed against ISO 10137, Bases for Design of Structures — Serviceability of Buildings and Walkways Against Vibrations, and in the United Kingdom against BS 6472-1, with ISO 2631-2 covering exposure to building vibration in the one to eighty hertz band that all of this sits in.

The loading question runs alongside it and gets forgotten more often. IBC Table 1607.1, Minimum Uniformly Distributed Live Loads and Minimum Concentrated Live Loads, lists gymnasium and assembly floors separately from office areas, and EN 1991-1-1 puts areas with possible physical activities in their own imposed-load category for the same reason. A floor plate designed and built as offices has not automatically been designed for what you are about to put on it, and a stack of bumper plates in one corner is a concentrated load nobody drew. Get the existing design assumptions out of the building file before the equipment layout is frozen; the answer sometimes moves the heavy zone to a different bay, which is by an order of magnitude the cheapest acoustic measure available on the job.

Damping matters here in a way it does not in an empty warehouse. The offices below, with their partitions, their ceilings and their contents, contribute damping to the same floor plate the gym sits on, and an open-plan refit of those offices during your defects period can genuinely make the gym above audible where it was not before. Note the assumption you relied on, and say so in writing.

Run the bay you are putting the studio in — span, section, the mass that will actually be up there in service — before you accept a resilient specification, because a low fundamental frequency is a problem no mat is being sold to solve.

The clear span between supports, centre to centre of bearing.

The section's second moment of area about the bending axis, from its published properties.

The stiffness of the beam material.

The mass this beam carries along its length, including its own, at the loading present in service.

How quickly the floor's motion dies away, as a percentage of critical damping.

Fundamental natural frequency

5.94 Hz

Medium confidence

This is a low-frequency floor, so a walking harmonic can resonate it and the response is governed by that resonance. Frequency alone does not settle whether it is acceptable — the full Design Guide 11 acceleration check, which needs the effective panel weight, does.

Static deflection under the supported mass
0.35 in
Dynamic amplification at resonance
16.67 (× static)
Walking pace whose second harmonic matches this floor
178.23 steps/min
Walking pace whose third harmonic matches this floor
118.82 steps/min

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 5.94 Hz — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

30 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • A single simply supported beam. A real floor vibrates as a panel of joists on girders, and the panel frequency is lower than any of its parts — Design Guide 11's combined-mode procedure exists for exactly that reason.
  • Continuity, fixity and adjacent bays are not modelled. A continuous beam over several supports is stiffer and its frequency higher than this.
  • Says nothing about acceleration, which is what people actually feel. Two floors at the same frequency can be worlds apart in comfort depending on effective panel weight and damping.

The Resilient Layer Is Not the One the Athletes Are Buying

Sports floor specifications and acoustic specifications both talk about resilience and they mean different things by it. EN 14904, Surfaces for Sports Areas — Indoor Surfaces for Multi-Sports Use, and ASTM F2772, Standard Specification for Athletic Performance Properties of Indoor Sports Floor Systems, grade a floor on shock absorption, vertical deformation and ball behaviour, all of which describe what happens to a person landing on the surface. None of them describes what reaches the floor below. A system can hit a high force-reduction class and still be an ordinary performer as an impact-sound layer, because the two properties are set by different parts of the same product.

The number that belongs in the acoustic specification is the improvement in impact sound insulation, measured to ISO 10140-3 and rated as a single figure through ISO 717-2, or in the North American framework the reduction achieved by a covering over a concrete floor measured to ASTM E2179 and the classification work in ASTM E989. Ask the pad supplier for the test report, ask which base floor it was measured over, and read the base floor description before reading the result: an improvement figure obtained over a heavy concrete slab does not transfer to a lightweight composite deck, and the difference is not a rounding error. Where the supplier can only offer the athletic classification, you have a sports pad with unknown acoustic performance, and saying so is more useful than assuming.

Order the pad against the finished court plus the aprons, run-offs and any zone that continues under fixed equipment, and add trim waste for the perimeter and for every cut-out around an anchor sleeve. Pad arrives in rolls or sheets that do not divide neatly into an irregular plan, and a floor that runs short in the last bay gets finished with whatever is on the van, which is precisely how a continuous resilient plane acquires a hard patch.

Take the pad off the same plan as the finish, including the run-off zones, and carry a trim allowance that reflects how many equipment anchors the layout puts through it rather than a habit figure.

SettingsSettings for this calculation
Who is doing the work?

Waste is set to 5% by hand. Pick a tier above to replace it, or keep your own figure.

The total gym or athletic court floor area to underlay.

Extra pad material for trim waste at the perimeter and around fixed equipment anchors.

Underlayment pad needed

3,392 ft²

High confidence

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Assumes the pad covers the floor, and plenty of systems do not. Point-elastic and combined builds sit on discrete pads at set centres beneath a plywood subfloor, so the material is a COUNT of pads on a grid, not square metres of sheet — a 300 m² (3,230 sq ft) court can take several thousand of them. Establish which of the two the specified system is before this area becomes a purchase order.
  • The slab underneath decides whether any of it performs. Flatness governs the result — sports systems are commonly specified to something like 3 mm (0.12 in) under a 3 m (10 ft) straightedge — and a hollow beneath the pad is a dead spot on the court that the correct material cannot fix. Slab moisture governs whether it can be laid at all: a timber floor over a damp slab cups within a season.
  • A sports floor has to be free to move. The expansion void around the whole perimeter, and the vented base that covers it, are part of the system rather than trim, and that is a perimeter length nowhere in an area figure. Fill the gap or run the floor tight to the wall and it lifts in the middle on the first humid week.

The Drop Zone Gets Built Twice

A dumbbell released from shoulder height is a single high-energy event with most of its content low in the spectrum, delivered to an area of a few hundred square millimetres. Nothing in the standard test suite reproduces it — the tapping machine is too light and too fast, and the rubber ball is closer but is still a defined source rather than sixty kilos of rubber-coated steel. That means the free-weight and platform areas are designed by construction rather than by a rating, and they are designed to spread the impact before it reaches the resilient layer instead of asking the resilient layer to absorb a point load.

The trade answer is a platform: a deck of two crossed plywood layers over the resilient pad, with the heavy top rubber laid on it, either recessed so it finishes flush with the surrounding floor or trimmed with a ramped edge. The plywood is what turns a point strike into a distributed load; a heavy rubber tile laid straight onto a thin pad transmits the strike almost as if the pad were not there, and crushes the pad locally until it stops working at all. Competition rules for the sport fix the platform dimensions where competition is actually held, but in a commercial fit-out the platform size comes off the rack layout and the safe working zone around it, so take it off the equipment drawing rather than a standard sheet layout.

Detail the edge before the joiner improvises one. The platform floats, so its trim cannot be screwed to both the platform and the surrounding floor, and the recess has to be formed in the build-up rather than cut into it afterwards. Bar ends land on the edge of platforms constantly, so the trim takes an impact load as well as a foot, and a trim fixed through to the deck is a rigid connection sitting exactly where the heaviest impacts happen.

  1. Set the platform positions off the rig and rack layout, not off a sheet grid.
  2. Form the recess in the build-up so the platform finishes flush; do not cut one later.
  3. Cross the plywood layers and stagger their joints so no joint runs through the full deck thickness.
  4. Keep the platform, its trim and the surrounding floor mechanically separate from each other and from the deck.
  5. Leave one platform accessible for a drop test before the whole floor is finished over.

Two crossed layers over each platform footprint is double the sheet area of the plan, and the offcuts from a recessed edge are not reusable — size it before the sheet order goes in with the rest of the carpentry.

SettingsSettings for this calculation
Who is doing the work?

The standard allowance most suppliers and estimating guides assume for ordinary work.

The length of the floor, wall, or roof area.

The width of the area.

Extra sheets for cuts around edges and openings.

Estimated plywood and osb sheet (subfloor, wall and roof) needed

18 sheets (4x8 ft)

High confidence

Sheet counts are a bin-packing problem rather than an area division. A sheet cut into two pieces that both get used is efficient; one cut into a piece you need and a remnant nothing fits is a whole sheet consumed.

Area to cover
507 sq ft

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

Plan of Area, 19′ 6″ by 26′.19′ 6″26′1′

What this calculation does not cover

  • Assumes sheets can be cut freely. Sheathing with a required panel orientation, or a face grade that must run one way, reduces what can be nested.
  • Excludes fasteners, adhesive, blocking at unsupported edges and the H-clips some sheathing applications require.
  • Does not account for the expansion gap between sheets, which most sheathing applications specify and which changes how many sheets a run needs.

Every Place the Floating Floor Is Allowed to Touch

A floating floor is only floating where nothing crosses it, and on a gym fit-out an enormous number of things want to cross it. The rig is the worst of them: a rack anchored through the pad into the deck is a deliberate rigid connection at the exact location where loaded bars are dropped, and it converts the most heavily used part of the floor into the one place the isolation does not exist. Where the rig genuinely has to be anchored down, it wants its own isolated base or a proprietary isolated anchor detail agreed with both the equipment supplier and the acoustician, and that conversation has to happen before the equipment order, because the base plates come with the rig.

Then work round the perimeter and list the rest of them: the floating layer running under a partition instead of stopping at it, the screed to a drain gully in the wet area, threshold strips screwed through into the deck, skirtings pinned to both the wall and the floor, mirror bases packed hard against the finish, and floor boxes for the audio system that were set out to the structural grid rather than to the floor build-up. Each one is quick to fix on a drawing and expensive to fix once the rubber is bonded. Set a hold point when the pad is laid and the platform decks are down, walk the whole plate, and photograph every place something crosses the plane — that photo set is also the record that settles the argument later.

Below the Slab: A Ceiling Hung on Clips, Not on Wire

The exposed grid ceiling in the offices below is not an acoustic ceiling in this sense, whatever its tile is rated at. A lay-in grid on plain hanger wire is rigidly connected to the soffit, and impact energy in the deck travels down every one of those wires and radiates off the tile. The intervention that changes the outcome is a boarded ceiling carried on resilient sound-isolation clips with furring channel snapped into them, deep enough below the soffit to leave an air space, with mineral wool laid in the void and the board taken to a continuous seal at the perimeter.

This is night work over an occupied tenancy, which drives the sequence more than the acoustics do. The existing ceiling has to come down and the new one has to be closed in shifts short enough that the office is usable in the morning, so the void has to be surveyed properly first — the sprinkler main, the ductwork runs, the lighting and the containment all have to be resolved against the new ceiling line before the first tile is lifted. Every one of those services that penetrates the new ceiling is a rigid crossing unless it is detailed as an isolated one, and a sprinkler drop with a solid escutcheon plate fixed to both the pipe and the board is a connection straight back to the deck.

Clip layout is a load calculation before it is an acoustic one. Each clip has a manufacturer-published static load range, and both ends of that range matter: overload a clip and its resilient element bottoms out and stops isolating, underload it and it does not settle into its working range either. Two layers of board weigh roughly twice what the estimator assumed when the ceiling was a single-layer allowance, so fix the layer schedule before the clip spacing is set, then work the layout out as rows across the run and fixing points along each channel. That gives the clip count, and the clip count gives the fasteners.

Fastener discipline decides whether any of it works. The screws that fix the clips to the framing or the deck are one item, the screws that fix board to the furring channel are a second, and they are not the same length — a board screw long enough to reach past the channel and bite the structure behind it grounds the ceiling out at that point and quietly undoes several metres of isolation. Keep the two boxes physically apart on site, and count them separately so nobody borrows from the wrong one at the end of a shift.

Once the clip layout is set, the fastener count follows from the clips and the manufacturer's fixings-per-clip figure — order it as its own line so the clip screws never come out of the board-screw box.

The total number of resilient sound-isolation clips in the layout.

The number of screws used to fasten each clip to the framing.

Total screws needed

80 screws

High confidence

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Counts screws against a clip number you supply, and it is the clip number that carries the acoustics. A resilient clip has a working load range with a floor as well as a ceiling: too few clips and the isolator bottoms out, too many and it is under-loaded so the rubber never deflects into the range where it does anything. On a decoupled ceiling, adding spare clips buys stiffness, not quiet.
  • Assumes every screw finds solid framing. A clipped ceiling hangs its entire board weight in withdrawal from two fasteners per clip, so a screw that catches the edge of a joist, misses into a gap, or bites sheathing only is a clip that is not there — and the count above still says it is.

Proving It Before the Offices Fill Up

There is usually no statutory impact-sound requirement for a gym over commercial offices. Approved Document E in England and Wales sets impact performance for floors separating dwellings and rooms for residential purposes, not offices, and the equivalent provisions elsewhere are similarly scoped. What governs your job is the lease, the landlord's fit-out guide and whatever criterion the acoustician wrote into the specification — so find the criterion, in writing, before anyone measures anything, because a test with no agreed pass value produces a number and an argument.

Measure the field performance to ISO 16283-2, Field Measurement of Impact Sound Insulation, rated through ISO 717-2, or to ASTM E1007 with the single-number classification from ASTM E989, depending on which framework the specification is written in. Run the heavy or soft impact source alongside the tapping machine wherever the low-frequency result is the one people care about, which on this job it is. And take a baseline in the offices below before the fit-out starts: an ambient survey of the occupied space costs a night and turns every later conversation from an impression into a comparison.

Then do the thing the standards do not cover. Build one platform early, over a bay that represents the worst case rather than the most convenient one, and drop a loaded bar onto it with somebody sitting in the office directly underneath. That is the test the tenant is going to run, and running it yourself while the rest of the floor is still open is the difference between adjusting a detail and lifting a finished floor.

  1. Get the acoustic criterion and its measurement method out of the lease or the specification in writing, first.
  2. Survey the occupied offices below for a baseline before demolition starts.
  3. Build a first-of-type platform bay and drop a loaded bar with an observer underneath.
  4. Field-test to ISO 16283-2 or ASTM E1007, and report field quantities against the agreed criterion, not laboratory ratings.
  5. Repeat the observed drop after the rig is anchored, because the anchors change the answer.

What to have settled before the pad is ordered

The items on a gym-over-offices fit-out that have to be resolved while the floor is still a drawing, and what each one actually depends on.

  • The existing bay's dynamic response — Span, section and in-service mass for the studio bay. A low fundamental frequency is a structural brief, not a material selection.
  • Design live load in the building file — Confirm what the floor was designed as. Gymnasium and assembly loading sits above office loading in IBC Table 1607.1 and in EN 1991-1-1.
  • Impact-improvement test report for the pad — Rated to ISO 717-2 from ISO 10140-3, or ASTM E2179 over concrete — and read which base floor it was measured over.
  • Platform footprints from the equipment drawing — Two crossed plywood layers per platform, recess formed in the build-up, trim isolated from both the platform and the surrounding floor.
  • Rig anchor detail — Agreed with the equipment supplier before the rig is ordered. Base plates arrive with the rig, and a plain anchor through the pad defeats it locally.
  • Clip load range and board schedule together — Two board layers roughly double the ceiling weight. Set the layer schedule first, then the spacing, then the fastener count.
  • Void survey below, before the first tile comes out — Sprinkler main, ductwork, lighting and containment resolved against the new ceiling line, with every penetration detailed as an isolated crossing.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • ISO 16283-2 — Acoustics — Field measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements — Part 2: Impact sound insulation
  • ISO 717-2 — Acoustics — Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements — Part 2: Impact sound insulation
  • ISO 10140-3 — Acoustics — Laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements — Part 3: Measurement of impact sound insulation
  • ISO 10140-5 — Acoustics — Laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements — Part 5: Requirements for test facilities and equipment
  • ASTM E1007 — Standard Test Method for Field Measurement of Tapping Machine Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies and Associated Support Structures
  • ASTM E492 — Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling Assemblies Using the Tapping Machine
  • ASTM E989 — Standard Classification for Determination of Single-Number Metrics for Impact Noise
  • ASTM E2179 — Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of the Effectiveness of Floor Coverings in Reducing Impact Sound Transmission Through Concrete Floors
  • EN 14904 — Surfaces for sports areas — Indoor surfaces for multi-sports use — Specification
  • ASTM F2772 — Standard Specification for Athletic Performance Properties of Indoor Sports Floor Systems
  • AISC Design Guide 11 — Vibrations of Steel-Framed Structural Systems Due to Human Activity
  • SCI Publication P354 — Design of Floors for Vibration: A New Approach
  • CCIP-016 — A Design Guide for Footfall Induced Vibration of Structures (The Concrete Centre)
  • ISO 10137 — Bases for design of structures — Serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibrations
  • BS 6472-1 — Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings — Part 1: Vibration sources other than blasting
  • ISO 2631-2 — Mechanical vibration and shock — Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration — Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz)
  • International Building Code, Table 1607.1 — Minimum Uniformly Distributed Live Loads and Minimum Concentrated Live Loads
  • EN 1991-1-1 (Eurocode 1, Part 1-1) — Actions on structures: densities, self-weight and imposed loads for buildings
  • Approved Document E (England and Wales) — Resistance to the passage of sound

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.