Six weeks out, and nobody has an order number
The programme says windows in week six. The scaffold is booked to come down in week eight, the plasterer has pencilled week nine, and the whole back half of the job hangs off the building being closed. Somewhere in March the fabricator said eight weeks on the phone and everybody wrote it in their heads. What nobody has is an order acknowledgement, a delivery week in writing, or a deposit that has actually left an account. The job is not late yet. It is being run on a memory of a conversation, which is a different thing from a schedule and behaves worse under pressure.
The useful question is not when the windows will turn up. It is the last date the order can be placed without the job stopping — one date, on a wall, that everybody can see. That date is a subtraction, it takes an afternoon with a phone and a calendar, and hardly anyone does it, because the only term in the subtraction most people ever ask for is the manufacturing lead time, and on a made-to-order item the four around it routinely add up to more than anybody allowed for. This page publishes no lead times, no survey turnarounds and no expedite premiums, because every one of those belongs to a particular supplier in a particular month. What it publishes is the arithmetic and the questions that fill it in.
Five intervals sit between a decision and an item in the opening
Work backwards from the moment the fitter needs the item in his hands, and five separate periods appear. Only one of them is what the trade calls the lead time. The other four are unquoted, sit in four different people's diaries, and are where a fortnight quietly goes missing on nearly every job that overruns for procurement reasons.
Do the pass in that order rather than forwards, because a forward pass answers a question nobody asked. Counting forwards from today tells you when the item will arrive if you order this minute, which is interesting and not actionable. Counting backwards from the fix date produces a deadline, and a deadline is a thing a builder can hold a client to when the client wants another week to think about the colour.
One discipline makes the whole exercise honest: every interval has to come from somebody who will be held to it, and it has to arrive in writing. A number remembered from a phone call is not evidence, and neither is a website's stated dispatch time for a stock line when what you are buying is made to a survey. Ask for each period in an email, keep the reply, and put the date it was given beside it — because an interval quoted in March against a March order book is not the same interval in July.
- Write the fix date: the day the item has to be physically in the opening, unwrapped and checked, with the fitter standing next to it. That is not the day the trade is booked; it is at least a day earlier, and on anything craned in it is earlier still.
- Take off the receiving allowance. Something has to be offloaded, inspected, moved to where it will stand and looked at closely enough that a cracked unit is found while the lorry is still there rather than in week nine.
- Take off transit — from the factory gate to your kerb, including whatever the haulier's delivery-day granularity actually is. Suppliers often quote a week rather than a day, and a week means you plan for the last day of it.
- Take off manufacture, exactly as the supplier states it, and write down in the same line what the supplier says that period runs FROM. That clause is the subject of the next section and it is worth more than the number in front of it.
- Take off the approval loop, where there is one: the fabricator's drawing goes out, somebody responsible reviews it, comments come back, a revision is issued. Two rounds is normal and one round is optimistic.
- Take off the survey or template slot, plus the turnaround between the surveyor leaving site and the order being releasable to the factory.
- Take off the gap between your decision and a supplier who is able to act on it: the acknowledgement being issued, and any deposit clearing. Cleared funds on a Friday afternoon do not book a Friday slot.
- What is left is the order-by date. Take your own float off that as well, put the earlier of the two on the wall, and treat everything after it as a decision that costs money rather than a decision that is still open.
| Interval | Runs from, and to | Whose diary it sits in | What pins it down |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commit to acknowledged | Your instruction, to a supplier who has accepted the order and taken it into the factory queue | Yours, then the supplier's sales office | A written order acknowledgement carrying your job reference, the specification and a delivery week |
| Survey or template | The site being ready to measure, to a set of releasable manufacturing dimensions | The supplier's surveyor, who covers a region and is not free tomorrow | A booked survey date, and a stated turnaround from survey to release |
| Drawing approval | Issue of the fabricator's drawing, to a signed and returned approval | Yours or the designer's — the only interval on this list you fully control | A stated review period agreed before the drawing is issued, not after it lands |
| Manufacture | Whatever event the supplier says starts the clock, to goods ready for dispatch | The factory's order book, which is a queue you joined on the day you were acknowledged | The lead time in writing, alongside the clause naming what it runs from |
| Transit and delivery | Ex works, to your kerb or into your building | A haulier the supplier chose and you have never spoken to | The delivery term, the delivery week, and who is contracted to unload |
"Eight weeks" from what, and ending where
Two clauses turn a lead time from a number into a date, and neither of them is usually on the quotation. The first is what the period runs from. Four answers are common and they are weeks apart on the same job: from receipt of a written order, from cleared funds, from approved drawings, or from a completed site survey. A supplier quoting eight weeks from approved drawings on an item that also needs surveying has quoted you the fourth interval on the list above and nothing else, and if you diary it as eight weeks from today you are already wrong by the survey slot, the turnaround, the drawing, the review and the revision.
The second clause is where the period ends. International commercial terms exist precisely to settle this and they are published: the International Chamber of Commerce's Incoterms 2020 rules define, among others, EXW where the goods are placed at the buyer's disposal at the seller's premises, FCA where the seller hands them to a carrier the buyer nominated, DAP where the seller delivers them to the named place ready for unloading, DPU where the seller unloads them, and DDP where the seller also clears them for import and pays the duty. For anything crossing a border those letters decide who books the lorry, who clears customs and who stands on the pavement at seven in the morning with a pallet truck. On a domestic job the same question hides behind plainer words — kerbside, tailgate, to the boundary, into the building — and the answer changes both the date and who pays when the load cannot get down the street.
The approval loop deserves treating as a scheduled activity rather than as a favour you will do quickly. AIA Document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, handles this properly: Section 3.10.2 requires a submittal schedule to be prepared and allow the architect reasonable time to review, and Section 3.12 governs shop drawings, product data and samples and is explicit that they are not contract documents and that their purpose is to demonstrate how the work will be executed. What that machinery is really doing is naming a duration and an owner for a period that otherwise floats. On a domestic job with no such contract, do the same thing by hand: agree a review period in days when the drawing is commissioned, and agree who signs. What signing a fabricator's drawing actually transfers is worked through on the truss-ordering page, and there is no reason to build that argument twice.
Get all of it onto the acknowledgement rather than the quotation. A quotation is a marketing document with a price on it; an acknowledgement is the supplier's own statement of what they have accepted, and it is the piece of paper that will be read if the delivery week slips. If the acknowledgement comes back without a delivery week, ask for one before the deposit goes, because that is the last moment you have any leverage at all.
The tape has to touch the building, and the man holding it has a diary too
Which items cannot be ordered until something exists to measure — glazing into formed openings, a staircase to a settled floor-to-floor, a worktop off levelled carcasses — is set out on the sequencing page and taken as given here. The scheduling consequence is the part worth adding: the survey is not an event, it is a booking with a lead time of its own, made with somebody who covers a region and fills a week at a time. Ask for the survey slot the day the opening is programmed, not the day it is formed, and ask separately how long the turnaround from survey to factory release runs, because those are two different periods and suppliers quote them as one.
Then there is the outcome nobody plans for: the survey comes back different from the drawing. An opening built to a drawing and an opening measured with a tape are related but not identical, and the gap decides who pays. Where the supplier surveys, the dimensional risk is generally theirs and a frame that does not fit is theirs to remake — which is exactly why suppliers insist on surveying and why a builder offering to save a week by supplying his own sizes is buying that risk without noticing. BS 8213-4, the code of practice for the survey and installation of windows and external doorsets, and ASTM E2112, the standard practice for installation of exterior windows, doors and skylights, both treat the survey and the tolerances around it as part of the installation rather than as paperwork before it. One line on the order — surveyed by the manufacturer — is worth more than any amount of care with a tape.
A quote valid for thirty days against a lead time longer than that
Look at the two dates on a made-to-order quotation and the contradiction is usually plain. The price is held for a stated period. The manufacturing time is longer than that period. Both are printed on the same sheet, and taken together they say something the supplier did not intend to say: this price and this delivery cannot both be honoured unless you order well inside the validity window. A quotation that expired in April and is being used to plan an August order is not a price. It is a historical record of what somebody was charging in April.
Only the material content should ever be escalated, and only where the quote breaks it out. Labour, plant hire, preliminaries and margin move on their own schedules and have very little to do with what aluminium billet or float glass did last quarter. If all you hold is a lump sum, the better move is to ask the original supplier for the material subtotal and put that figure alone through the arithmetic, then flag the balance for a fresh price rather than escalating a fitter's day rate at a metals rate.
The rate itself has to come from somewhere defensible, and the strongest source is your own invoice history for the same product code from the same supplier over a known period. Failing that, published indices exist for exactly this: the Office for National Statistics Construction Output Price Indices and the Department for Business and Trade's Monthly Statistics of Building Materials and Components in the UK, the RICS Building Cost Information Service indices alongside them, and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Producer Price Index commodity data for construction materials. AACE International Recommended Practice No. 58R-10, Escalation Estimating Principles and Methods, is the reference for doing it properly rather than by feel. A category index for the specific material always beats one guess applied to construction as a whole.
Whether the contract carries a mechanism for any of this is a separate question and on a domestic job the answer is almost always no. Standard forms provide for it explicitly — the JCT fluctuations provisions, with Option A covering contribution, levy and tax fluctuations, and NEC4 secondary Option X1 providing for price adjustment for inflation — but a builder's quotation for a rear extension is a fixed price with no such clause in it. That is precisely why the expired quotation matters: with no fluctuations mechanism, an out-of-date price is not adjusted, it is re-quoted, and the re-quote arrives as a number the client has never seen.
Put in the material subtotal as it was quoted, the months between the day it was priced and the day you will realistically place the order, and an annual rate you can defend from your own invoices or a published index for that category. It compounds monthly, so a rise measured over two years belongs in the box as a per-year figure — and treat the answer as a planning baseline that tells you whether to chase a re-quote, never as a price.
The price from an old quote or estimate.
How many months have passed since the quote was given.
Your assumed yearly rate of change for this material category.
Estimated current price
$10,512
This assumes a steady compounding rate, but real material prices (especially lumber, steel, and copper) often move in sharp, unpredictable swings rather than smoothly — get a fresh quote for anything time-sensitive.
- Total change
- $511.62
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Material Price Escalation Calculator: 10,512 $ (estimated current price) — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
What this calculation does not cover
- Months Since Quote is held between 1 and 120 and an out-of-range entry is clamped to the nearer end when you leave the box, so a quote three weeks old has to be pushed up to a full month and one eleven years old is escalated as though only ten years had passed.
- The rate field accepts nothing below -20% or above 50% a year and the original price stops at $1,000,000, so a timber line that doubled since it was priced, or a seven-figure supply package, has to be broken into stages or separate runs before the figures will go in.
- Two numbers come back and no more, the escalated price and the dollar difference from the original, with no month-by-month schedule underneath, so there is nothing showing how much of the rise accumulated in the first year against the last.
- The old price is simply multiplied out, with no currency term anywhere in the arithmetic, so a quote issued in another currency carries whatever the exchange rate has done since it was written entirely outside this answer.
- Nothing separates months already gone from months still ahead of you, because the figure you type is used only as an exponent, so escalating to a delivery date some way off means adding that lead time into the months yourself.
The second date on the wall: when a change stops being a change
The order-by date is the one everybody eventually draws. There is a second one behind it, usually a good deal earlier than people assume, and it is the day the item stops being cancellable. On bespoke goods the ordinary consumer protections do not help: the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 exclude from the cancellation right, at regulation 28(1)(b), goods made to the consumer's specifications or clearly personalised. A window set surveyed to your openings and powder-coated to your chosen finish is exactly that. Once the aluminium is cut and the glass is toughened, nobody is putting it back in stock, and the abortive cost is not a restocking fee — it is the item.
That gives the calendar a shape most people never draw. Before the order, a change is free. Between the order and the cut, a change is an administration cost and a place lost in the queue. After the cut, a change is a second item bought at full price, and the clock on it starts from the back of the factory's order book rather than from where the first one had got to. Clients are entitled to change their minds and frequently should; what they are entitled to is a clear statement of which of those three zones the calendar is currently in.
When one does come, price it as it will actually be invoiced and put the abortive cost of the item already in production inside the direct cost, because no arithmetic will find it for you. The money mechanics around a variation — what is contingency finally materialising versus what is additional scope, and how the payment schedule gets re-cut around it — are worked through on the stage-payments page and on the two variation pages, and this page does not restate them. The scheduling point stands on its own: a variation raised after the cut costs the change, plus the item, plus the whole manufacturing interval a second time.
Enter the direct cost of the change with the abortive value of the item already in production folded into it, then the markup the contract sets and whatever flat charge it carries per change order. Run it twice — once for the change alone and once with the abortive item added — and the difference between the two totals is what the second date on the wall is actually worth.
Your direct material + labor cost for the added scope.
Markup applied to the additional work, same as your normal project markup.
A flat fee covering paperwork, re-scheduling, and coordination overhead.
Total change order cost
$2,400
- Markup amount
- $300
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Change Order Cost Calculator: 2,400 $ (total change order cost) — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
What this calculation does not cover
- Markup lands on the added work cost alone — the administrative fee is added after it and is never marked up, so a contract that allows markup on the processing charge will settle slightly above this figure.
- One percentage covers the whole variation, with no split between overhead and profit and no separate rate for subcontracted work; where a sub's price already carries its own uplift, no second tier is stacked on top of it here.
- Time is absent from the arithmetic. Nothing is priced for extra days on site, extended preliminaries, or the disruption to work already sequenced around the original scope, which on a mid-project change is often the larger number.
- The flat fee is counted once per run. Several small variations that each trigger their own charge, or one order bundling unrelated items, have to be worked through individually rather than as a single lump.
- Deductive changes have no route in: the added work cost cannot be taken below zero, so a credit for scope removed has to be handled as its own line away from this page.
- The added work cost is entered as one figure, so nothing distinguishes short-notice material pricing, restocking on cancelled orders, or remedial work to undo what was already built — those belong inside the number you type, or they are missing from the total.
Committed on Tuesday, spent in November
Placing an order does something to the budget that nothing else on a job does: it converts a line from an estimate into a liability, on a date, before any of the work behind it has happened. A signed order for a window set is money gone whether or not the extension is ever built, and it is gone weeks or months before the invoice for it is due. Two curves therefore run across a job — what has been committed and what has been paid — and long-lead items are what makes them diverge early and hard.
Read the materials figure with that in mind and it stops being a single number. It is the part of the budget that gets committed earliest, in the largest individual lumps, and to the smallest number of counterparties. On a job with a fabricated steel beam, a window set and a staircase, three orders can easily account for the majority of the material spend and all three can be committed before the first internal wall comes down. Knowing what proportion of the whole job that represents is what tells you how much of your funding has to be genuinely available at the order date rather than at the fix date.
Two consequences follow and both are covered properly elsewhere, so take them as pointers rather than as argument. Who owns unfixed goods standing on a drive, and why paying for them is not the same as owning them, is worked through on the stage-payments page; what insures them between the factory and the fixing is on the insurance page. The point for a procurement calendar is narrower and specific: the day you commit is the day the exposure starts, and it is usually not the day anybody has written on the cash-flow forecast.
Enter the three cost lines and whatever buffer the job justifies, and then read one number off it that the total obscures: the materials figure as a share of the whole. That share is roughly what has to be committed, funded and insured from the order dates rather than from the fixing dates — and on a job with two or three made-to-order items, most of it lands on two or three days.
Total cost of all materials for the project.
Total cost of hired labor, if any.
Building permits, inspection fees, and similar required costs.
Extra buffer for unexpected costs — nearly every renovation finds at least one surprise.
Total project budget
$10,695
- Materials
- $5,000
- Labor
- $4,000
- Permits & fees
- $300
- Subtotal
- $9,300
- Contingency buffer
- $1,395
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Renovation Budget Calculator: 10,695 USD — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
What this calculation does not cover
- Sales tax, delivery charges, tool and equipment rental, dumpster and disposal fees, and temporary storage or lodging have no field of their own — the subtotal is exactly materials plus labor plus permits, so anything else reaches the total only if you fold it into one of those three figures yourself.
- The buffer multiplies the combined subtotal, so a fixed-price cabinet order, an open-ended demolition line and a published permit fee are all padded at the same percentage; there is no way to carry a heavier margin on just the part of the job that holds the unknowns.
- If the labor figure is your own hours-times-rate estimate rather than a contractor's quote, a general contractor's overhead and profit on materials and subcontracted trades appears nowhere in the sum, which adds only the three amounts entered.
- Every set of entries returns the same high confidence, including a 0% buffer at the bottom of the allowed range or the 50% at the top, because nothing in the arithmetic examines whether the percentage chosen suits the work being priced.
- Each amount is treated as a price known today: no duration, phasing or draw schedule enters the calculation, so a project whose material prices move between quote and purchase, or whose costs straddle two budget years, is totalled as though it all happened at once.
The order-by date has gone. There are exactly four moves
Sooner or later the subtraction gets done and produces a date in the past. This is the normal case rather than a disaster, and the reason it feels like one is that people reach for the first move without pricing the other three. There are four, they are the only four, and each is right in different circumstances.
Choosing between them is an arithmetic problem with one number in it that nobody has: the cost of a week of delay on this particular job. Build it before the phone call, not after. A week holds some or all of the crew standing or redeployed at a cost either way, every time-charged item on site continuing to be charged — scaffold, container, welfare, plant — the site set-up running longer than it was priced to run, finance on whatever is borrowed, and, if the delay pushes past a season boundary, work that was going to be done in September being done in November. Put a figure on that week and the expedite premium either looks cheap or it does not, and the argument with the client stops being about feelings.
- Expedite. Ask what it costs to move up the queue, and ask separately whether the constraint is the factory's capacity or its material supply, because money moves the first and does nothing at all to the second.
- Substitute. Find a stock item that meets the same performance requirement — for fenestration that means the same tested performance under AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440, the North American Fenestration Standard, or the same declared performance under the relevant harmonised standard, not merely the same appearance. A substitute that fails on U-value, water penetration or structural loading has moved the problem into building control.
- Resequence. Fit the item later and close the opening temporarily, which is only viable where the closure can be made genuinely weathertight and where the trades behind it can honestly start. Price the temporary closure, the extra scaffold weeks it commits you to, and its removal.
- Absorb it. Accept the delay, tell the client on the day you know rather than the day it bites, and move whatever can be moved forward into the gap so the crew is not simply standing.
| Move | What it buys | What it costs | When it is the right one |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expedite | The original item, on the original specification, closer to the original date | A premium the supplier names, and goodwill you may want later for something worse | The constraint is queue position rather than raw material, and a week of delay costs more than the premium |
| Substitute | A date you control, from stock, usually at a lower price | Specification drift, a client conversation about appearance, and re-checking compliance | A stock product genuinely meets the tested performance, and the item is not the one the design is about |
| Resequence | Continuity for every trade behind the item, at the price of one revisit | Temporary closure, extended hire on anything time-charged, and a second mobilisation for the fitter | The opening can be made properly weathertight and the following trades can start behind it without pretending |
| Absorb | Nothing bought, nothing risked, and a programme that stays honest | The delay in full, and the credibility cost of having found out late | The other three are more expensive than the week, or the item is genuinely on the critical path with no substitute |
Whichever of the four you pick, three of them cost money that has to already exist. Run the base budget against a buffer the job justifies, then hold the buffer up against the worst of the four moves priced out — if the expedite premium or a full re-order is larger than the whole contingency, the buffer was sized for a different job and the honest time to say so is now.
Your planned budget before adding a buffer for the unexpected.
The extra buffer to add for unexpected issues.
Total budget with contingency
$23,000
Contingency is a planning buffer, not a guarantee — projects that uncover major surprises (structural damage, code-required upgrades) can still exceed even a generous contingency.
- Contingency amount
- $3,000
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Project Contingency Calculator: 23,000 $ (total recommended budget) — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
What this calculation does not cover
- The percentage is applied to the base budget as one flat multiplier, so every dollar of the job is treated as carrying identical risk. A $20,000 kitchen made up of $14,000 of fixed-price cabinetry already on order and $6,000 of demolition into an unknown wall gets the same $3,000 buffer at 15% as one that is speculative end to end. Where the risk sits in a single part of the scope, size a buffer against that part and add it to the rest rather than smearing one rate across the total.
- Nothing in the arithmetic is a fixed amount: the buffer is purely proportional, so it shrinks with the budget while many of the surprises it is meant to absorb do not. A failed inspection, half a day of extra excavation or an emergency call-out costs roughly the same on a $3,000 job as on a $300,000 one, yet 15% sets aside $450 on the first and $45,000 on the second. Small jobs are the ones a percentage rule quietly under-buffers.
- Whatever is missing from the base figure stays missing from the answer. The base budget is read as a single opaque number, so if permits, disposal, delivery charges or temporary accommodation were never counted in it, a 15% buffer on that total does not fund them — it scales an incomplete estimate rather than completing it.
- The output is a lump sum with no timing in it. No term asks when the money is drawn or how long ago the base was priced, so a buffer taken on a year-old estimate is a percentage of a stale number. Re-running the figure part-way through a job would need the remaining scope and the buffer already consumed, and neither is tracked here.
- The percent field accepts whole numbers from 5 to 50 and the base accepts $100 to $2,000,000; those are input bounds, not guidance about where your job belongs. The commonly cited 10-20% range is a general renovation figure, and nothing in the calculation weighs building age, how much structural work is involved, or how firm your quotes are to place you within it.
Delivered is not received
The lead time does not end when the lorry arrives. It ends when the right item is on site undamaged, and the gap between those two events has ended more programmes than any factory ever has. A cracked unit found in week nine is a fresh manufacturing interval starting from week nine; the same crack found while the driver is still there is a supplier's problem with a supplier's urgency behind it. Inspect on the pavement, before signing, and sign for the count and the condition separately from signing for the delivery.
The law behind that is worth knowing in outline because it sets deadlines you can miss by being polite. In the United States the Uniform Commercial Code gives the buyer a right to inspect goods before payment or acceptance under Article 2, section 2-513, a right to reject a non-conforming tender under section 2-601, and — the trap — a duty under section 2-607(3)(a) to notify the seller of a breach within a reasonable time after it is or should have been discovered, or lose the remedy. Section 2-612 deals with instalment contracts, which is what a window set delivered in two loads actually is. In the UK, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 sets a default delivery period of thirty days at section 28 and makes time of the essence only where that was agreed or where the consumer told the trader it was essential before the contract was made, which is a strong argument for the fix date appearing in the order rather than in a conversation. Between businesses the Sale of Goods Act 1979 leaves whether a time stipulation is of the essence to the terms of the contract, at section 10, which comes to the same practical instruction: put the date in writing.
Offloading is the other half of receiving and it is contracted, not assumed. Somebody is obliged to lift the load off the lorry and it is whoever the delivery term says it is; a driver who is only obliged to open the tailgate will do exactly that. A delivery turned away because the vehicle could not get down the street, or because nothing was on site to lift a glazed unit, is not a delivery that happens tomorrow — it is a redelivery, charged, at whatever slot the haulier has next. Check the access, the vehicle size the supplier despatches on, and the lifting arrangement at the point of ordering, when there is still time for the answer to change something.
Then it has to stand somewhere for however long it waits. Glazed units stand on edge on packers and not flat; frames stand vertical and supported; timber stays flat, off the ground and dry; and none of it stands where a scaffolder will be working. The Glass and Glazing Federation's good practice guidance and the National Glass Association's GANA Glazing Manual cover handling and site storage of glass, and every serious manufacturer publishes its own storage instructions with the warranty tied to them. An item delivered early to protect a programme and then stored badly has protected nothing, and it is a specific kind of miserable to lose a unit to a stack that fell over three weeks before anybody needed it.
Two dates, on the wall, where the client can see them
The whole of this comes down to two dates per item and a column of evidence behind each. The first is the last day the order can be placed. The second is the last day the order can be changed. Both belong on a single sheet with the supplier's name, the acknowledgement reference, the price validity date and the delivery week against them, and that sheet belongs somewhere the client walks past rather than in a folder on a laptop. Nothing focuses a decision about a colour like a date in a fortnight's time written in marker pen.
The characteristic failure this prevents is not dramatic. It is a job that is otherwise going well, with a competent crew and a reasonable client, standing still in week seven because a made-to-order item was ordered in week three on the assumption that eight weeks meant eight weeks from the day somebody remembered saying it. The subtraction takes an afternoon. Doing it in week one is the cheapest afternoon on the job.
Get these in writing before the deposit leaves the account
Six things that turn a remembered lead time into a date you can hold somebody to. None of them needs a price, all of them need somebody else's signature, and every one is free to ask for in week one and expensive to ask for in week seven.
- The order acknowledgement, carrying a delivery week — Not the quotation. The acknowledgement is the supplier's own statement of what they have accepted into the factory queue, and it is the document that gets read if the week slips. If it comes back without a delivery week, chase it before the money moves.
- The clause naming what the lead time runs from — Receipt of order, cleared funds, approved drawings or completed survey are four different starting guns and they are weeks apart on the same job. The number is worth nothing until this clause is beside it.
- The delivery term, and who is contracted to unload — Kerbside, to the boundary, or into the building — and across a border, the Incoterms 2020 rule by its three letters. It decides the date, the access requirement, and who pays for a redelivery when the lorry cannot get down the street.
- The survey booking and its turnaround, as two separate periods — Suppliers quote them as one. Book the slot when the opening is programmed rather than when it is formed, and get the manufacturer named as the surveyor so the dimensional risk sits with the people making the item.
- The price validity date, set against the manufacturing period — When validity expires before the item could possibly be made, the sheet is holding a price and a delivery it cannot hold together. A domestic contract carries no fluctuations mechanism, so an expired price is not adjusted — it is re-quoted.
- The point of no return, asked for explicitly — The day the item stops being cancellable, which on bespoke goods is the day it is cut rather than the day it ships. Ask the supplier for it in the same email as the lead time, and put it on the wall next to the order-by date.
Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.
