Estimating

Provisional Sums, PC Sums and Allowances

Half a fixed price can be placeholders. What a provisional sum is really holding, and what the total does on the day the real figure arrives.
  • 21 minReading time
  • 9Sections
  • 4Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

The one round number on a page of odd ones

The quote has been chosen. It is the nine-page one, it reads like somebody went round the house with a torch, and it is on the table waiting for a signature. Somewhere on page six, between the plastering and the decoration, is a line that says provisional sum, kitchen, and a figure. The figure is round, and nothing else on that page is: there is a quantity against the plaster, a rate against the skirting, a number of visits against the scaffold. This one carries none of that. It was not measured. It was picked.

That roundness is not a warning sign; it is closer to the opposite. Nobody can price a kitchen that has not been chosen, and an estimator who invented a precise-looking number for one would be worse, not better. What the roundness does mean is that the total at the bottom of the page is two different kinds of number added together and presented as one — a price, which somebody is bound by, and a placeholder, which nobody is. The headline reads as a commitment across its whole width, and it is not.

So the questions worth an evening are narrow and arithmetical. How much of that headline is actually fixed. Whether the builder's overhead and profit are inside the placeholder or waiting outside it. What the total does on the day the kitchen is chosen and the real invoice lands, in which direction, and by how much more than the obvious difference. If instead you are still holding three quotes and trying to decide between them, that is a different job with a different method, and it is covered on the quote-comparison page rather than here.

Four species of soft money, and only one of them is an allowance

The words get used as though they were synonyms and they are not. An allowance is American practice: a stated sum written into the contract sum for a scope item not yet selected, dealt with in AIA Document A201 at Section 3.8. What that section says about its contents is the part that catches people. The allowance covers the materials and equipment delivered to site with the taxes on them, less trade discounts. Unloading and handling, the labour to install, the contractor's overhead and profit on that labour, and everything else the item drags with it sit in the contract sum around the allowance and not inside it. An allowance of a given size therefore never buys a given size of finished work, and was never meant to.

British practice splits the same idea in two. A prime cost sum is money for something a third party supplies rather than the builder, and the scope of the words has narrowed: under the old Standard Method of Measurement it covered work executed by a nominated specialist as well as goods, while RICS New Rules of Measurement 2 confines it to materials or goods from a supplier and states plainly that the sum excludes the fixing, the main contractor's profit and any attendance. Either way the figure never travels alone: the profit on it and the attendance owed to whoever brings the thing to site are separate priced items beside it in the bill. The word attendance hides two things that behave oppositely, and the split is worth asking about at the quote stage. General attendance is standing provision the specialist merely uses — space to work, the scaffold already up, water, power, welfare, storage — and it is a lump that mostly does not scale. Special attendance is what that specialist alone needs: unloading, hoisting, a hardstanding, a temporary opening left in the wall. Choose a heavier stone and the special attendance can move a long way while the general attendance does not move at all.

A provisional sum is the third species and it is for work rather than goods: an operation everybody knows will be needed and nobody can yet measure — underpinning of an extent nobody has dug to find, a rewire of a floor whose circuits are behind plaster. The fourth thing is not a sum at all. An approximate quantity is a real measured item at a real tendered rate whose quantity is a guess, remeasured at the end, and it behaves better than any of the others because only one of its two components is soft.

Between two provisional sums that look identical on the page sits a single word that decides whether a second bill exists. NRM2 carries the distinction forward from the Standard Method of Measurement of Building Works and the JCT forms use it: a DEFINED provisional sum came with enough description that the contractor is taken to have programmed the work and priced its effect on his preliminaries, and an UNDEFINED one did not. The consequence lands at the end of the job — an undefined sum can carry time and preliminaries as well as value, and what that does to a final account is worked through on the final-account guide. The reason it belongs on this page is that the word is chosen now, by whoever wrote the tender documents, and it is almost never printed on a domestic quote. Ask which it is, and have the answer written on the line, while the ink is still wet.

The soft lines in a quote, what each is money for, and what moves when the real figure arrives
What the line is calledWhat the number is money forWhat else moves when it is spent
Allowance, in the AIA senseMaterials and equipment delivered to site with their taxes, for an item not yet selectedHandling, installation labour and the overhead and profit on it, all of which sit in the contract sum outside the allowance
Prime cost sumGoods from a named supplier — and, under the older measurement rules, work by a named specialist — priced by that third party rather than by the builderProfit, usually as a percentage that follows the sum; general attendance, which mostly does not; special attendance, which can
Defined provisional sumWork described well enough that the contractor could programme it and price its effect on preliminariesThe value of the work only — the programme effect is already inside the tendered preliminaries
Undefined provisional sumWork the tender documents did not describe well enough for any of thatThe value of the work, plus a possible extension of time, plus the preliminaries that run for the extra weeks
Approximate quantityA real measured item at a tendered rate, with only the quantity uncertainNothing but the quantity, remeasured on completion against the rate already agreed — the least exposed line on this table
The soft lines in a quote, what each is money for, and what moves when the real figure arrives

Inside the number, or waiting outside it

One question settles more money than everything else on this page, and it can be asked in a single sentence at the kitchen table: does that figure already contain your overhead and profit, or do you add them when it is spent? The two readings of the same line sit a long way apart, and on a domestic quote nothing on the paper decides between them.

The standard forms all decide it, in their own ways, which is the argument for using one. A201's answer is that the allowance holds the goods and the taxes and nothing else, so the builder's margin on the installation lives in the contract sum and adjusts only as his costs do. British practice puts profit against a prime cost sum as its own item in the bill, visible and stated. FIDIC's Conditions of Contract for Construction handles provisional sums inside its variations and adjustments clause, and the percentage for overhead and profit is not left to argument at all — it goes into the tender appendix or the contract data, depending on edition, before anyone tenders. Australian practice under AS 4000 does the same through a margin stated in the annexure. All of them share one instinct: fix the percentage while nobody yet knows which way it will cut.

The test on a quote that names no form takes ten minutes and is worth doing before the conversation rather than after it. Rebuild the line from underneath: the goods figure the sum is supposed to cover, plus the installation labour the same quote prices elsewhere for that trade, plus the overhead and profit percentage the builder says he works on. If the answer lands on the printed sum, the margin is already inside it. If the printed sum matches the goods and labour without the margin, it is net, and a further percentage is waiting that nobody has mentioned. The conversion between markup and margin, and why twenty per cent means two different numbers, is worked through on the quote-comparison page; what matters here is only which base the percentage is applied to.

There is a second half to the same question that people reach only after the first surprise. When the real cost exceeds the sum, does the percentage land on the whole substituted cost, or only on the excess? Both are defensible and both are used. On a sum that overruns by half, the difference between them is the margin on the original sum all over again, which is not a rounding error. Get the answer in writing next to the line, in the builder's own words, before either of you has any idea which way the kitchen will go.

Reconstruct one soft line from underneath: the goods the sum is meant to cover as the material, the installation the quote prices elsewhere as the labour, and the percentage the builder says he works on. If the total lands on the printed sum, the margin is already inside it; if it lands above, the margin is still to come.

Your direct cost for materials on this job.

Your direct labor cost for this job (wages, not billed rate).

The percentage added on top of costs to cover overhead and profit.

Total price to charge

$9,600

High confidence
Cost subtotal
$8,000
Markup amount
$1,600
Gross margin on the price
16.67 %

What this calculation does not cover

  • Only two cost lines feed the subtotal — materials and labor. Permits, equipment and tool rental, dumpster and disposal fees, subcontractor invoices, insurance, fuel and supervision are not inputs, so anything you have not already buried inside those two figures is neither marked up nor billed.
  • Materials and labor are marked up at one identical rate, because the percentage is applied once to their combined subtotal. If you price material at one percentage and labor at another — a common split — price the two separately and add the results, since a single blended figure here will not reproduce that.
  • The markup amount in the breakdown is gross, not profit: it is the one figure that has to carry overhead and profit together, and there is no overhead input to separate them. Office costs, vehicles, estimating time and idle days come out of that same amount before anything is left over.
  • The gross margin row is the same money expressed against the price instead of against the cost, and it is always the smaller percentage of the two — a 20 per cent markup is a 16.7 per cent margin. It is shown because the two are routinely used interchangeably and are not equal; it is still gross, so overhead has not been taken out of it, and it is not a net profit figure.
  • Nothing is added after the markup — the total is exactly the subtotal multiplied by one plus your percentage. Sales tax, VAT or GST, permit fees passed through to the client, and card or financing charges all sit outside it, so the number is a price to quote rather than a finished invoice.
  • The costs you enter are treated as final and already known. There is no waste allowance and no contingency term, so if supplier prices move between quote and purchase or the hours run long, the overrun comes out of the markup instead of being added to the price.
  • Each cost line accepts up to 500,000 and the markup up to 200 per cent, which caps how large a single job this will price without splitting it. The currency is a label only: the answer comes back in whatever currency you typed the costs in, with no conversion and no rounding to a tidy quotable figure.

Nobody can spend it until somebody says so

A provisional sum is not a budget the builder is holding on your behalf. It is a hole in the contract with a number in it, and until somebody with authority fills the hole, the money is not his to spend and the work is not his to do. The JCT forms make this explicit: the contract administrator instructs, and the sum gives way to the value of what was actually carried out. A201 runs the same logic through Article 7 and adds one obligation on the owner at Section 3.8 that is easy to skim past and expensive to miss — the item under an allowance has to be selected in time to avoid delaying the work. The selection is your job, and it has a deadline whether or not anyone has written one down.

Where the two of you cannot agree what the substituted work is worth and it cannot wait, A201 has a mechanism for proceeding anyway: the construction change directive at Section 7.3, a written order signed by the owner and the architect that directs the change before the adjustment has been agreed, with the amount settled afterwards on actual expenditures and savings and a reasonable allowance for overhead and profit. That is a better position than the domestic default, where the work either stops or proceeds on nothing and gets argued about in October. Which valuation basis applies, and how an omission credit differs from an addition, belongs to the variation guides.

Two contracts are worth knowing about for opposite reasons. The NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract provides no provisional sum at all, deliberately: work is described in the Scope as well as it can be, and anything that turns out differently is a compensation event with its own machinery for time and money. A line reading provisional sum on an NEC contract has been bolted on and will not interact cleanly with the rest of the form. At the other end, a domestic job with no form at all falls back on general consumer law, where the Consumer Rights Act 2015 supplies a reasonable price at section 51 where none was agreed and a reasonable time at section 52 — a backstop rather than a mechanism, telling you what a court would eventually decide and not what happens on Wednesday. In California a change order on a home improvement contract has to be in writing and signed by both parties under the Business and Professions Code provisions at section 7159, which matters precisely because spending an allowance is administered as a change.

  1. Write down who is allowed to instruct the sum to be spent — you, an architect, a surveyor — and make sure the builder has the same name written down.
  2. Fix the date by which the selection has to be made, working back from the supplier's lead time rather than from the week the trade is due on site.
  3. State on the face of the line whether the provisional sum is defined or undefined, because the answer decides whether an extension of time can ride on it.
  4. Name the valuation basis for the substituted work and the overhead and profit percentage that applies to it, and whether that percentage lands on the whole cost or only on the excess.
  5. Say what happens to the money if the actual cost comes in under the sum, in one sentence, with the word credit in it.
  6. Get the substituted figure agreed in writing before the order is placed, not after the goods are on a lorry, because the leverage disappears the moment they are.

What the total does on the day the real figure lands

The first relief available is that the adjustment is a difference rather than a substitution: the sum comes out and the actual cost goes in, so the exposure is the gap between them and not the whole of the new figure. How that reconciliation is performed line by line at the end of the job belongs to the final-account guide. What belongs here is what the gap is actually made of, because it is never just the subtraction.

Walk it once with bare numbers. These are arithmetic and not a price; no currency is attached to them and none should be read into them. Say the sum is 8,000 and the kitchen you actually want, delivered, is 11,500. The obvious answer is 3,500, and it is the only one of the four additions about to land that anybody has mentioned. If the contract adds overhead and profit to the difference, that is on top. If the units you chose are more of them, or heavier, or need scribing to an out-of-square wall, the installation labour has moved too, and that is a second addition with its own margin on it. Whatever tax regime the job sits in then applies to the total after all of that, not to the 3,500 you first thought of. The gap you fund is routinely half again what the subtraction suggests.

Run it the other way as well, because the underspend is where domestic contracts are least symmetrical. The standard forms reduce the contract sum when the actual cost comes in below the sum, in words as plain as the ones that increase it. A one-page domestic quote has no such machinery: the sum is simply a figure inside a total, and nothing obliges anyone to hand any of it back, which is how a client who chooses a modest kitchen finishes up paying for an immodest one. The fix is one sentence saying the sum adjusts in both directions, and it costs nothing to ask for while the contract is unsigned.

Tax deserves its own look on domestic work in the UK, because it is where a sensible-sounding decision goes wrong. HMRC's VAT Notice 708 governs which building work is zero-rated or reduced-rated, and materials supplied by the contractor in the course of qualifying work follow the rating of that work. Materials you buy yourself do not: on work to a house you already occupy you pay the standard rate at the till and there is nothing to reclaim, because the reclaim scheme that helps a self-builder reaches new dwellings and qualifying conversions rather than ordinary renovation. So taking a provisional sum out of the contract and buying the kitchen directly, which feels like removing the builder's margin, can cost more than leaving it in with the margin on it. Which side of that line your job sits on is a question for the contract and the notice, not for a rule of thumb. More mundanely, check whether the soft lines are printed net of tax against a headline printed gross.

Last, the aggregation. One sum exceeded by a third is a conversation. Six sums each exceeded by a third is a different project, and they will not average out, because every one of them was set before a showroom was involved and every one moves the same way. That directional bias is the most reliable thing about allowances, and it is why the exposure has to be totalled rather than assessed line by line.

Price the adjustment the way it will actually be invoiced. Enter the DIFFERENCE between the real cost and the sum rather than the whole substituted figure, apply the percentage the contract sets, and add whatever the change carries as an administration charge. Run it a second time on the full cost if your contract puts the markup there instead, and the gap between the two answers is what that one clause is worth.

Your direct material + labor cost for the added scope.

Markup applied to the additional work, same as your normal project markup.

A flat fee covering paperwork, re-scheduling, and coordination overhead.

Total change order cost

$2,400

High confidence
Markup amount
$300

What this calculation does not cover

  • Markup lands on the added work cost alone — the administrative fee is added after it and is never marked up, so a contract that allows markup on the processing charge will settle slightly above this figure.
  • One percentage covers the whole variation, with no split between overhead and profit and no separate rate for subcontracted work; where a sub's price already carries its own uplift, no second tier is stacked on top of it here.
  • Time is absent from the arithmetic. Nothing is priced for extra days on site, extended preliminaries, or the disruption to work already sequenced around the original scope, which on a mid-project change is often the larger number.
  • The flat fee is counted once per run. Several small variations that each trigger their own charge, or one order bundling unrelated items, have to be worked through individually rather than as a single lump.
  • Deductive changes have no route in: the added work cost cannot be taken below zero, so a credit for scope removed has to be handled as its own line away from this page.
  • The added work cost is entered as one figure, so nothing distinguishes short-notice material pricing, restocking on cancelled orders, or remedial work to undo what was already built — those belong inside the number you type, or they are missing from the total.

Hold the sum against what you want, not against another quote

The comparison that tells you most is not between this quote and the next one. It is between the sum and a real thing with a real price on it. Take the figure to a showroom on a Saturday before signing anything, specify the kitchen you would actually choose, and get it quoted properly. If the sum buys it, the line is honest and you can sign with a clear head. If the sum buys two-thirds of it, you have found the real price of the job while you still have the leverage to do something about it, which is a good afternoon's work.

What the line does not cover is the other half of the exercise and it is rarely spelled out. A kitchen allowance is usually cabinetry: not the worktop, not the appliances, not the sink and tap, not the handles if they are a separate order, not the delivery, and not the electrical alterations the new layout requires. Some of those are priced elsewhere in the same quote, some sit behind a second soft line, and some are nowhere at all. Go through it asking of each only where is this, and accept nowhere when that is the true answer. What a kitchen contains trade by trade is set out on the kitchen-costing guide.

Then there is the form of the allowance itself, which changes what you are exposed to. A cash allowance is a total, and the quantity risk sits with whoever measured it. A per-unit allowance — flooring supplied at a stated rate per square metre — is a rate with no quantity attached, and neither the quantity nor the wastage is in the number. An allowance of that shape can be met exactly on rate and still overrun badly on total, because the area was estimated by somebody who has not measured your rooms and the pattern you chose cuts differently from the one they assumed. Convert every per-unit allowance into a total against your own measured area with the overage the pattern justifies, and only then compare it to anything.

Two shapes of allowance and what each leaves you carrying
How the line is writtenWhat is fixed in itWhat it quietly leaves open
A cash allowance — a stated total for the itemThe money set aside for the goods, whatever quantity or specification turns out to be neededThe specification. Nothing in the number says the sum buys anything you would actually choose
A per-unit allowance — a rate per square metre or per metre runThe rate for the goods, which is genuinely useful and comparable between suppliersThe quantity, and the overage on it. Both belong to you and neither appears in the line
A prime cost sum against a named specialistThe specialist's price, which is a real quotation from a real firm rather than an estimator's guessThe profit and attendance beside it, which are separate items and adjust on their own rules
A provisional sum for an operation, not for goodsAlmost nothing — it is an acknowledgement that work will be needed, with a placeholder against itThe extent, the method, and where it is undefined, the programme and the preliminaries that run with it
Two shapes of allowance and what each leaves you carrying

Not the contingency, and never the same money twice

A provisional sum and a contingency are both money set aside for something that has not happened, which is where the resemblance ends. A provisional sum is for known work of unknown amount: everybody agrees the kitchen exists and nobody knows which one. A contingency is for work nobody has named — the drain under the footing, the rot behind the render, the joist that is not where the survey said. They fail differently, they are drawn down by different events, and they belong to different people. The provisional sum is inside the contract sum and the builder will spend it; the contingency is yours, sits outside the contract sum, and ideally the builder never learns its size.

Which produces the commonest budgeting error on a quote of this shape. Apply a contingency percentage to the headline and you have buffered money that is already a buffer, paying twice for the same uncertainty on the soft portion. Worse, you still have not covered it, because a placeholder does not move by a tidy percentage of itself; it moves by the distance between a guess and a decision, which on a kitchen can be most of the line again. The correct base is the firm part of the contract only, and the soft part gets its own named line sized by the showroom test.

The vocabulary for doing this properly already exists and is worth borrowing even on a domestic job. RICS New Rules of Measurement 1 carries no single contingency at all; it carries risk allowances in separate categories — design development risk, construction risk, employer change risk and employer other risk — each sized against what it is for. Provisional sums are none of those four and NRM1 keeps them apart. How much contingency the named unknowns on your own job justify is argued from first principles on the renovation-budget guide.

Type in the FIRM part of the quote as the base budget — the headline with every provisional sum, prime cost sum and allowance stripped out — rather than the headline itself. Applying a percentage to the whole thing buffers the placeholders twice and still does not cover them, because a placeholder does not move by a percentage of itself.

Your planned budget before adding a buffer for the unexpected.

The extra buffer to add for unexpected issues.

Total budget with contingency

$23,000

Medium confidence

Contingency is a planning buffer, not a guarantee — projects that uncover major surprises (structural damage, code-required upgrades) can still exceed even a generous contingency.

Contingency amount
$3,000

What this calculation does not cover

  • The percentage is applied to the base budget as one flat multiplier, so every dollar of the job is treated as carrying identical risk. A $20,000 kitchen made up of $14,000 of fixed-price cabinetry already on order and $6,000 of demolition into an unknown wall gets the same $3,000 buffer at 15% as one that is speculative end to end. Where the risk sits in a single part of the scope, size a buffer against that part and add it to the rest rather than smearing one rate across the total.
  • Nothing in the arithmetic is a fixed amount: the buffer is purely proportional, so it shrinks with the budget while many of the surprises it is meant to absorb do not. A failed inspection, half a day of extra excavation or an emergency call-out costs roughly the same on a $3,000 job as on a $300,000 one, yet 15% sets aside $450 on the first and $45,000 on the second. Small jobs are the ones a percentage rule quietly under-buffers.
  • Whatever is missing from the base figure stays missing from the answer. The base budget is read as a single opaque number, so if permits, disposal, delivery charges or temporary accommodation were never counted in it, a 15% buffer on that total does not fund them — it scales an incomplete estimate rather than completing it.
  • The output is a lump sum with no timing in it. No term asks when the money is drawn or how long ago the base was priced, so a buffer taken on a year-old estimate is a percentage of a stale number. Re-running the figure part-way through a job would need the remaining scope and the buffer already consumed, and neither is tracked here.
  • The percent field accepts whole numbers from 5 to 50 and the base accepts $100 to $2,000,000; those are input bounds, not guidance about where your job belongs. The commonly cited 10-20% range is a general renovation figure, and nothing in the calculation weighs building age, how much structural work is involved, or how firm your quotes are to place you within it.

Two totals, and only one of them belongs to the bank

The end of the evening is two figures rather than one. The first is the contract sum, which is what you will sign and what the builder is bound to, and it is a perfectly real number for that purpose. The second is the probable outturn: the same quote rebuilt with every soft line replaced by what the thing you actually intend to have costs today, plus the margin treatment you established, plus your own contingency on the firm part. The second number is always the larger and it is the only one worth planning against, telling a partner, or holding against what a lender has agreed to.

Keep them side by side rather than collapsing them, because they answer to different people. The contract sum is the number the builder is held to and the number the payment schedule divides — how that schedule is cut and what each payment attaches to is covered on the stage-payments guide. The outturn is the number you are held to. When they are far apart, that gap is not pessimism; it is the measured size of the decisions you have not made yet, and it shrinks every time you make one.

Rebuild the quote as an outturn rather than a contract sum: enter materials with the soft lines restated at what you actually intend to buy, labour including the extra installation the upgrade drags with it, permits and fees as quoted, and a contingency percentage sized on the firm part of the job alone.

Total cost of all materials for the project.

Total cost of hired labor, if any.

Building permits, inspection fees, and similar required costs.

Extra buffer for unexpected costs — nearly every renovation finds at least one surprise.

Total project budget

$10,695

High confidence
Materials
$5,000
Labor
$4,000
Permits & fees
$300
Subtotal
$9,300
Contingency buffer
$1,395

What this calculation does not cover

  • Sales tax, delivery charges, tool and equipment rental, dumpster and disposal fees, and temporary storage or lodging have no field of their own — the subtotal is exactly materials plus labor plus permits, so anything else reaches the total only if you fold it into one of those three figures yourself.
  • The buffer multiplies the combined subtotal, so a fixed-price cabinet order, an open-ended demolition line and a published permit fee are all padded at the same percentage; there is no way to carry a heavier margin on just the part of the job that holds the unknowns.
  • If the labor figure is your own hours-times-rate estimate rather than a contractor's quote, a general contractor's overhead and profit on materials and subcontracted trades appears nowhere in the sum, which adds only the three amounts entered.
  • Every set of entries returns the same high confidence, including a 0% buffer at the bottom of the allowed range or the 50% at the top, because nothing in the arithmetic examines whether the percentage chosen suits the work being priced.
  • Each amount is treated as a price known today: no duration, phasing or draw schedule enters the calculation, so a project whose material prices move between quote and purchase, or whose costs straddle two budget years, is totalled as though it all happened at once.

The best provisional sum is the one that is gone before you sign

Every technique on this page manages an exposure that does not have to exist. A provisional sum is there because a decision has not been made, and a decision you could make this month costs nothing to make. Choose the kitchen, get it quoted with model numbers on the quotation, and ask for the line to be replaced by a specification and a firm figure. Most builders will do it gladly: a fixed line is easier to programme, easier to order against, and it removes an argument they were going to have with you in month three.

Where a sum genuinely has to stay — the underpinning nobody can measure until the trench is open, the rewire behind the plaster — three things go on the page beside it and none of them takes a paragraph. A date by which the selection or the survey has to happen, worked back from the lead time. The word defined or undefined, so that everyone knows in advance whether time and preliminaries can travel with it. And one sentence saying how the substituted work is valued, what percentage rides on it, which base that percentage applies to, and that the adjustment runs in both directions. Three lines of writing against a line that could move by five figures.

The uncomfortable version of the same point is worth saying plainly. A quote where a third of the headline is placeholders is not a fixed price with some detail outstanding; it is a partial price with a firm-looking total on the bottom, and it was produced honestly by somebody who could not have done otherwise given what he was told. The way to convert it into a real number is not to negotiate it. It is to go and make the decisions that turn the round numbers into odd ones.

Settle these while the contract is still unsigned

Six things that turn a headline containing placeholders into a number you can plan against, all of them done before a signature and while the builder still wants the job.

  • Every soft line highlighted and totalled — Allowance, prime cost sum, provisional sum, approximate quantity — mark each one, add them up, and subtract the total from the headline. What is left is the part of the quote that is genuinely a price.
  • Defined or undefined, written on the face of each provisional sum — An undefined sum can carry an extension of time and the preliminaries that run for the extra weeks; a defined one cannot, because the contractor was told enough to have programmed it. Same figure, second bill.
  • Whether overhead and profit are inside the sum or added to it — And if added, whether the percentage lands on the whole substituted cost or only on the excess. On a sum that overruns by half, that single clause is worth the margin on the original sum again.
  • One sentence saying the adjustment runs both ways — The standard forms reduce the contract sum when the actual cost comes in under the allowance. A domestic quote with nothing written has no machinery to give anything back, and nobody volunteers it.
  • The selection deadline, worked back from the lead time — The choice has to be made in time to avoid delaying the work, which is the owner's obligation rather than the builder's — so it needs a date on the page, taken from the supplier's lead time and not from the week the trade is due.
  • The showroom test on the largest sum, before signing — Specify what you would actually choose and get it quoted. If the sum buys two-thirds of it, you have found the real price of the job while you still have the leverage to do something about it.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • AIA Document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction — Section 3.8, Allowances; Article 7, Changes in the Work, including Section 7.3, Construction Change Directives
  • AIA Document A101, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor where the basis of payment is a Stipulated Sum
  • AIA Document A105, Standard Short Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor
  • RICS New Rules of Measurement 2, Detailed measurement for building works — prime cost sums, provisional sums, and the distinction between defined and undefined work
  • RICS New Rules of Measurement 1, Order of cost estimating and cost planning for capital building works — risk allowances (design development, construction, employer change and employer other risk)
  • Standard Method of Measurement of Building Works, Seventh Edition (SMM7) — the origin of the defined and undefined provisional sum distinction carried into NRM2, and of the wider prime cost sum that covered work by a nominated specialist
  • JCT Standard Building Contract — instructions on the expenditure of provisional sums, and the valuation rules applied to the substituted work
  • JCT Intermediate Building Contract and JCT Minor Works Building Contract
  • JCT Building Contract for a Home Owner/Occupier
  • NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract — the Scope, and compensation events in place of any provisional sum mechanism
  • FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction (Red Book) — Provisional Sums within the Variations and Adjustments clause, with the percentage for overhead and profit stated in the tender appendix or contract data
  • AS 4000, General Conditions of Contract (Standards Australia) — provisional sums and the margin stated in the annexure
  • Consumer Rights Act 2015 — section 51 (reasonable price where none is agreed) and section 52 (reasonable time)
  • California Business and Professions Code, section 7159 — home improvement contracts, and the requirement that a change order be in writing and signed
  • HM Revenue and Customs, VAT Notice 708, Buildings and construction — zero-rating, the reduced rate, and the treatment of materials supplied by the contractor as against materials bought by the customer

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.