Below grade

Fitting a Radon Sump and Fan to an Existing Slab

A result above the action level is a pressure problem: where the suction point goes, how many the floor needs, and which fan holds the field.
  • 20 minReading time
  • 12Sections
  • 5Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

The result is back and somebody has already bought sealant

A detector sat in the basement for three days over the winter, the laboratory returned a figure north of the action level, and by the time anyone with a core drill is involved the owner has been to a merchant and come home with a case of cartridges. The cracks get filled, the joint between slab and wall gets raked out and gunned, the hatch over the old sump gets screwed down, and the retest comes back within noise of the first. Nobody has done anything foolish. They have simply treated the slab as though it were a barrier.

It is worth being clear with them about what the number they are reacting to actually is. An action level is a policy trigger, not a safety cliff: the U.S. EPA recommends fixing at or above 4 pCi/L and considering it between 2 and 4, the United Kingdom works to an Action Level of 200 Bq/m³ with a Target Level of 100, and the WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon proposes a reference level of 100 Bq/m³ rising to no more than 300 where that is not achievable. The figures differ because the policy differs, not because the physics does, and none of them says anything about where the gas is getting into this particular house.

Back to the slab, then, because it is not a barrier and was never asked to be. Soil gas does not diffuse through a floor in any quantity that matters; it is drawn through it, because the house sits at a lower pressure than the ground beneath it for most of the heating season. Stack effect, a flue in operation, a tumble dryer, wind on the elevation — each subtracts from the pressure in the lowest storey, and the ground makes up the difference through a hairline shrinkage crack, the annulus around a soil stack, the gap where the slab was poured up to the wall, the open cores of a block foundation. Closing nine tenths of that entry area does not reduce the flow by nine tenths, because the same pressure difference drives more air through what is left.

Active sub-slab depressurisation gives up on sealing as a strategy and attacks the pressure instead. A fan draws continuously from a void under the floor and holds the material beneath the slab slightly below the pressure in the room, so every crack that used to be an inlet becomes an outlet: a trickle of indoor air leaving downward instead of soil gas arriving upward. Nothing is filtered and the concentration in the ground is very nearly what it always was — the gas now simply has an easier route to the roof than into the living room. Every decision that follows, from the number of suction points to where the discharge goes, is a decision about whether that reversal actually reaches the far corner of the floor.

What to tell them to do this week, and what not to promise

There is usually a gap of weeks between the result and the install, and a very high reading makes that gap uncomfortable. Increased ventilation of the affected storey is the recognised holding measure, and the U.S. EPA's consumer guidance on radon reduction describes it as exactly that: something that lowers the number while it runs and stops the moment it does not. It is worth sizing rather than gesturing at, because a basement window opened an inch is not a rate and cannot be compared with anything.

Be blunt about the limits when you hand the figure over. Dilution is proportional and unforgiving — halving a concentration means roughly doubling the air change rate, and it costs heat for every hour it runs. It is not a remedy, it satisfies nobody's standard, and it has to be off well before the confirmatory measurement, because short-term tests run under closed-house conditions with the house shut twelve hours beforehand and throughout. An owner who leaves an interim fan running through the retest gets a flattering number describing a house nobody lives in. Sizing a permanent extract run, and balancing supply against extract across a whole dwelling, are the ventilation guides' subject; what is wanted here is a rate for one space and a date it stops.

Put the affected room's real dimensions against an air change rate so the interim measure is a stated flow that can be compared with a fan on a shelf, rather than an open window and an assumption.

Different rooms have different recommended ventilation rates.

The length of the room.

The width of the room.

Floor-to-ceiling height.

Recommended airflow (CFM)

85.3 CFM

Medium confidence

Based on general air-changes-per-hour targets, not a code-mandated minimum for your specific jurisdiction — check local building code for required bathroom/kitchen exhaust minimums.

Room volume
640 cu ft
Target air changes/hour
8 ACH

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 85.3 CFM — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

10 ft8 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • This sizes the airflow the room needs, not the fan you buy. Manufacturer CFM ratings are measured against a static pressure far lower than a real installation imposes, and duct length, elbows, flexible duct, the interior grille and the exterior cap all cut delivered flow. None of that is modelled here.
  • This is not a code compliance check. Codes commonly set a flat minimum exhaust rate for bathrooms and kitchens, plus separate whole-dwelling ventilation rates driven by floor area and occupancy, and a small bathroom or WC will compute below those minimums. Size on whichever figure is larger and confirm it against the code your work is inspected under.
  • Makeup air is not accounted for. Air pulled out has to be replaced, so a fan sized from this figure with no door undercut, transfer grille or trickle vent will move less than the number says, and in a sealed room it can depressurise the space enough to backdraft an open-flued gas or solid-fuel appliance. Combustion safety is a separate check, not something this result covers.
  • The air change rate is one fixed value per room type, and only four room types exist. It does not move for the number of occupants, shower versus bath use, gas versus electric cooking, cooktop or hood width, an openable window already in the room, local humidity, or whether the fan runs continuously or on a timer.
  • Room volume is length x width x height and nothing else. A sloped or vaulted ceiling, an L-shaped room, a dropped bulkhead, or a space open to an adjoining one such as an ensuite off a bedroom or a kitchen open to the dining area has no honest set of three numbers to enter, and the volume has to be worked out separately.

The slab is a lid; the diagnosis is about what is under it

Everything expensive about a mitigation job is decided by material nobody can see. Over 100 mm of clean, single-sized aggregate, one suction point will hold the whole floor: the void between the stones is continuous, and a fan pulls a pressure field across it much as it would pull along a duct. A slab cast straight onto compacted clay, onto reclaimed hardcore fines, or onto sand that has since silted up is a different job entirely — the fan may hold a two-metre radius and nothing beyond it.

The way to find out is a communication test, and it is the single most valuable hour on the job. Core a test hole through the slab, seal a vacuum source into it, and drill small test holes at increasing distance: near, mid-floor, then at the far corners and behind every interior wall. With the vacuum running, read the pressure difference at each with a micromanometer.

ANSI/AARST SGM-SF, Soil Gas Mitigation Standards for Existing Homes, frames the requirement as measurable negative pressure at the extremities of the slab rather than a single number every house must hit. That is deliberate: what counts as measurable depends on an instrument resolving a fraction of a pascal, and practitioners generally report something around a pascal at the furthest point as the sign a field has genuinely arrived. Zero at the far corner with the vacuum flat out is not a marginal result. It is the answer, and it means a second point.

Read the flow as well as the pressure, because the two together name the soil. High flow and low suction is open aggregate. Low flow and high suction is tight material with a small void. High flow and no pressure at any remote hole means the vacuum has found a route to outdoors — an untrapped floor drain, a void in the footing, a slab edge that never met the wall — and is short-circuiting rather than depressurising. That third result is the one most often misread as good news.

What lies under a slab, and what a communication test tends to show through it
Sub-slab materialTypical diagnostic behaviourWhat it usually means for the design
Clean single-sized aggregate, 100 mm or moreHigh flow, low suction, field reaches the perimeterOne point often serves a whole floor; a low-suction, higher-flow fan
Aggregate present but shallow or dirtyModerate flow, field fades before the far cornersOne point plus a larger pit, or a second point in the weak quadrant
SandVariable; can carry a field well until it silts or wetsTest more remote holes than you think you need, including seasonally low ground
Compacted clay or fines, no fill layerLow flow, high suction, field collapses within a couple of metresMultiple points and a high-suction fan, or a larger excavated void at each
Slab cast on undisturbed rock or lean concrete blindingAlmost no flow at any suctionSub-slab depressurisation may not be the right technique at all
Old polythene sheet under the slab, tornErratic — good in one direction, dead in anotherThe sheet is dividing the field; treat each side as a separate floor
What lies under a slab, and what a communication test tends to show through it

How many points, and which quadrant each one owns

Suction points are not allocated by floor area. They are allocated by what the diagnostic showed, and the thing that most often forces a second one is not distance but an obstruction. A strip footing under an interior bearing wall is a dam cast down into the sub-slab material; a thickened slab under a masonry partition does the same. A garage floor poured a year after the house, a basement extended under a later addition, a step in level between an original cellar and a converted store — each is a separate slab with its own field, whatever the floor covering suggests.

Where the house has an existing drainage sump with a lid that can be sealed, it is very often the cheapest point available: the pit is already excavated and already tied into the perimeter drain ringing the footing, so a riser taken off it pulls along the whole drain line — exactly the distribution a mitigator would otherwise spend a day building. The trade-off is that the pump keeps working, so the lid needs a gasketed, mechanically fixed cover with sealed grommets for the discharge and the power lead, and the float must stay serviceable through it.

Set the layout out on the floor before anything is cut. The point wants to be as central to the field it serves as the room allows, clear of furniture and future partitions, and somewhere a vertical riser can leave without crossing a habitable room. That last constraint decides more layouts than the diagnostic does, because a perfect suction point with no route upward is not a suction point.

  1. Scan for reinforcement, conduits and under-slab heating before marking anything.
  2. Trace footings and thickened slab lines from the original drawings where they exist, and from a hammer survey where they do not.
  3. Core a diagnostic hole at the proposed position and read flow and suction there before committing to it.
  4. Drill remote test holes at the far corners, behind every interior bearing wall and in each separately poured area, and record the pressure at each with the vacuum running.
  5. Where a quadrant reads nothing, choose between a second point and a larger excavation at the first, then test again rather than assuming.
  6. Fix the riser route upward before the pit is cut, and patch every diagnostic hole once the design is settled — an open test hole is a short circuit into the room it was drilled in.

Cutting the pit, and why size pays for itself here

The hole through the slab is trivial and the void beneath it is the job. A core through 150 mm of concrete takes minutes; scraping aggregate out through that hole with a bent bar and a shop vacuum takes an hour and decides what the fan will achieve. Every litre removed reduces the entry loss between pipe and field, moving the operating point along the fan curve towards more flow at less suction. EPA/625/R-93/011, Radon Reduction Techniques for Existing Detached Houses, describes forming an excavated void beneath the opening for exactly this reason, and the practice figure quoted most often — a bucketful and upward — is a floor rather than a target. In tight material it is worth taking out several times that.

Core rather than break wherever the slab will allow it. A hammered hole leaves a ragged annulus that is hard to seal cleanly and starts the crack radiating away from the opening that becomes the first air path back into the room. Where reinforcement is hit, cut it back cleanly inside the hole rather than leaving a bar bridging the void with sealant packed around it.

The riser is then set into the hole and sealed to the slab around its full circumference. That collar is a structural detail as much as an airtightness one: it carries the weight of the pipe, it resists whatever gets kicked into it, and it is the only part of the system a vacuum cleaner will eventually be driven against. Use a sealant with movement capability rather than a rigid mortar collar alone, and do not bring a concrete patch up hard against the pipe without a bond breaker — a shrinkage crack around a rigid collar is an inlet reopened three months after handover.

A retrofit suction point through an existing floor

A retrofit suction point in section, from the subgrade upward: the excavated void beneath the slab, the sub-slab aggregate it opens into, the cored slab, the sealant collar closing the annulus, and the riser leaving for the fan.
  1. Riser pipe — carries the extracted soil gas to a fan mounted outside the occupied envelope, and is the only resistance in the system anyone chooses Duct Static Pressure Calculator
  2. Sealant collar — closes the annulus between pipe and core, takes the pipe's weight, and has to keep moving with the slab rather than crack away from it Caulk & Sealant Calculator
  3. Existing floor slab — not a barrier and never was; it leaks at every crack, joint and service penetration whenever the room is at lower pressure than the ground Concrete Calculator
  4. Sub-slab aggregate — the layer the pressure field travels through, if it exists at all; its depth and cleanliness decide how many suction points the floor needs
  5. Excavated suction pit — the void scraped out beneath the core, whose size sets the entry loss and therefore where the fan sits on its own curve
  6. Subgrade — the source; its concentration is unchanged by any of this, and the system works by giving the gas an easier route out than in

The riser is the only resistance you get to choose

A mitigation system has two resistances in series and you control precisely one of them. The sub-slab field's share is a property of the ground and the pit, revealed by the diagnostic and adjustable only by digging more out. The pipe's share is arithmetic, and it is where an otherwise sound design gets quietly spoiled: a riser stepped down to save on fittings, a route through four elbows because it was easier to drill, a long horizontal leg thrown across an attic to reach a discharge point somebody preferred the look of.

Work in the larger diameter unless there is a reason not to. Stepping a 100 mm riser down to 75 mm multiplies the velocity for the same flow and the friction rate with it, and on a system where the fan has a couple of hundred pascals to spend that is not a marginal loss. Long-radius bends cost a fraction of what a moulded square elbow costs, and on a run this short the fittings routinely outweigh every straight metre put together. Keep the horizontal legs short, let the vertical do the work, and slope each of them back towards the suction point: soil gas arrives at ground temperature and close to saturation, so a riser crossing a cold attic makes condensate along its whole length, and that water has to drain back to the pit rather than pond in a level leg and close the bore. The standards require the fall for exactly that reason.

Two details outlast the install. Label the pipe where it is visible, at every storey it passes through, as part of a radon reduction system — the standards call for it, and the alternative is a future occupier cutting into an unmarked pipe in a cupboard. And where the riser crosses a fire-separating element it is a penetration like any other; that detail belongs to the firestopping guide rather than being improvised here.

Price the riser's own share of the pressure budget from its straight length, its fittings and its friction rate, remembering that this answers only for the pipe — the sub-slab field's share comes off the diagnostic, not off a formula.

Supply plus return, along the longest path.

Elbows, takeoffs, boots and transitions, expressed as the equivalent length of straight duct.

Design friction rate for the ductwork.

Everything that is not duct.

Total external static pressure

0.5 in w.g.

Medium confidence

Exceeding the blower's rated external static pressure reduces airflow, which reduces capacity — a correctly-sized unit then behaves like an undersized one.

Total effective length
250 ft
Duct friction loss
0.25 in w.g.
Components
0.25 in w.g.
Pascals
124.54 Pa
Against a 0.5 in w.g. blower rating
100 % of rating

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 0.5 in w.g. — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

100 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Fitting equivalent lengths must come from the Manual D tables for the specific fittings used; the default here is a plausible figure, not yours.
  • Component pressure drops should come from the manufacturer's data at your design airflow, not from a typical value.
  • Measured static pressure on a commissioned system frequently exceeds the calculated figure. Measure it rather than trusting the arithmetic.

A radon fan lives in the opposite corner of the curve

Almost every other fan in a house is chosen for flow and asked to work against very little pressure. A bathroom extractor is a few tens of litres per second at perhaps fifty pascals; a range hood is chosen on the number printed on the carton. A radon fan is the inverse. It moves a small flow — tens of cubic feet per minute, not hundreds — against a suction that in tight ground can run to several hundred pascals, and it does it continuously, wet, and often at outdoor temperature, for years without being switched off.

Ventilation instinct applied to that duty produces two classic mistakes. The first is fitting the biggest fan on the shelf to a tight floor: on low-permeability ground a high-flow fan simply runs near its shut-off point, making noise and heat, drawing its full current, delivering almost nothing and holding no more suction than a properly matched high-vacuum unit would. The second is fitting a high-vacuum fan to an open aggregate bed, where the field needs volume rather than depth and the curve has nothing to bite on. Match the fan to what the diagnostic told you: high suction and low flow for clay and fines, higher flow and modest suction for a clean stone bed.

Read the manufacturer's published curve rather than the headline rating. RadonAway, Fantech and Festa all publish flow against static pressure for each model, and the point that matters is where your system's total resistance crosses that line. A fan quoted at an impressive free-air figure will be doing a fraction of it at the operating point your pit and pipe impose — which is why the curve is published at all.

Specify for the duty as well as the point. The fan is rated for continuous operation and for the moisture it carries, its housing must be sealed at the seams because everything downstream of the impeller is above ambient pressure and full of soil gas, and it must be listed for where it is mounted. The supply is governed by the adopted wiring code — NFPA 70, the National Electrical Code, in the United States and BS 7671 in the United Kingdom — and the detail installers regret skipping is the disconnect: it has to exist for servicing, and it has to be somewhere nobody will flick it off to quieten the house down.

Where the fan sits, and what else is up there

The rule governing fan position is not about noise or access. Downstream of the impeller the pipe is pressurised and carrying the most concentrated soil gas anywhere in the building, so any leaking joint, cracked coupling or knock from a stored bicycle discharges that gas wherever the fan is standing. ANSI/AARST SGM-SF therefore keeps the fan and all pressurised pipe out of the occupied and conditioned envelope — an unconditioned attic, an outside wall, a detached structure — and a fan in a basement, a cupboard or a crawlspace beneath living space is a defect however tidy it looks.

The discharge is governed by the same standard. It goes up, above the roof line rather than out of a gable at head height, and it is set back from windows, doors and air intakes by a stated separation; those figures live in the standard and have shifted between editions, so read the one the work is held to rather than carrying a distance from the last job. Terminating into a soffit or beside a ventilated eave returns the discharge to the roof space and, from there, to whatever the ceiling leaks.

Before leaving the loft, check what else up there is already moving air. A powered attic ventilator in the same roof pulls a substantial flow out of it, and every cubic foot has to come from somewhere — through the eaves if the intake area supports it, through the ceiling plane if it does not. Pulling air through the ceiling depressurises the storey below, which is the exact pressure difference the mitigation system exists to reverse, and a roof terminal sitting in the ventilator's draw can recirculate the discharge as well.

See the airflow a power attic ventilator in the same roof is sized to move, because that air is drawn in through the eaves if the intake allows it and through the ceiling plane if it does not — and the second case works directly against the system you are commissioning.

The total floor area of the attic space.

Minimum fan CFM

756 CFM (minimum)

Medium confidence

Dark roofs, steep pitches, and hot climates all increase attic heat load beyond this baseline rule of thumb — size toward the higher end of available fan models if any of those apply.

Attic area
1,080 sq ft

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 756 CFM (minimum) — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Floor area is the only geometry this uses. Roof pitch, ridge height and attic depth never enter the formula, so a shallow hip and a steep gable over the same footprint return the same CFM even though the steep one holds far more air to turn over.
  • It does not check that the attic has enough intake. A fan sized from this number still needs matching net free intake area at the soffits; starved of intake it pulls make-up air out of the house through ceiling leaks, which can depressurise the top floor and backdraft an atmospherically vented water heater or furnace. Size the intake separately before you buy the fan.
  • Nothing adjusts for roof colour, climate, insulation level, radiant barrier, or existing ridge and gable venting — the same divisor is applied to every attic. Dark roofs, steep pitches and hot climates all put the real heat load above this baseline.
  • This is a rule-of-thumb equipment sizing figure, not a code calculation. Codes govern attic ventilation as net free vent area against attic floor area, and fitting a powered fan does not remove that requirement.
  • Rated CFM is not delivered CFM. Shutters, insect screens, a clogged louver and static pressure at the opening all cut what the fan actually moves, and the figure here makes no allowance for that, for the thermostat or humidistat setpoint, or for splitting the airflow across more than one fan.

Sealing, now that it has a job to do

Sealing was useless as a remedy and is essential as a support. Once a fan is holding the sub-slab material below room pressure, every unsealed opening in the floor steals suction from the far corner and spends fan capacity dragging warm indoor air into the ground. The order changed, not the work: the fan goes in, then the openings that measurably rob it get closed, which is why ASTM E2121, Standard Practice for Installing Radon Mitigation Systems in Existing Low-Rise Residential Buildings, carries sealing provisions alongside the depressurisation ones. The list of what matters is shorter than the list of what gets caulked. The perimeter joint between slab and wall is normally the largest single opening in a basement floor and often the only one worth a full day. An untrapped floor drain is a direct short to the drainage system. The open top course of a hollow block foundation wall connects the whole cavity to the sub-slab material and to the room, and capping it moves readings in a way that hairline cracks in an otherwise sound floor never will.

Where there is no slab at all — an earth-floored cellar, or a crawlspace under part of the footprint — the technique changes name and the sealing becomes the field. A membrane laid over the ground with a suction point beneath it is sub-membrane depressurisation, and it succeeds or fails on the continuity of the sheet at its laps, perimeter and penetrations rather than on the fan. That work, and the encapsulation it sits inside, is covered properly in the crawlspace and ground gas membrane guides.

The system is now a permanent exhaust appliance in the basement

A well-built mitigation system draws almost entirely from the ground and barely moves the pressure in the house. One with a leaking sump lid, an open floor drain or a poorly sealed collar draws a meaningful share of its flow out of the room instead, and that share is continuous exhaust which was not there when the appliances in the basement were last checked. The appliance most exposed is the one standing closest to the work: the atmospherically vented water heater or boiler in the utility corner, drafting adequately on the margin it had and now holding less of it.

The mitigation standards treat this as part of the installation rather than somebody else's problem, requiring the installer to confirm that combustion appliances still vent correctly with the system running. Do it as a test, not an inspection. Put the appliance under its worst realistic condition — every exhaust device in the house running, interior doors in their worst positions, the mitigation fan on — and check for spillage at the draft hood with the flue cold, then again once it has warmed.

Where the space is confined, the free area feeding it either absorbs the change or does not. The indoor air method in NFPA 54, the National Fuel Gas Code, and in the International Fuel Gas Code sizes those openings against the combined input rating of every appliance drawing from the space, with two openings required, one high and one low. It is a screening figure rather than a full combustion air analysis, but it settles the common argument quickly: an appliance cupboard with one small grille at the top does not satisfy the method whatever the mitigation fan is doing, and the day you make that space slightly more negative is a poor moment to discover it.

Size the openings that ought to be feeding the appliance beside your suction point, before deciding whether a marginal draft test is the mitigation fan's doing or a combustion air deficiency that has been there for years.

The fuel-burning appliance's total rated input, from its nameplate.

Minimum free area per opening

100 in²

Medium confidence

This is the NFPA 54/IFGC indoor air method for a confined space, requiring TWO openings of this minimum free area each (one high, one low). Outdoor air methods use different (typically smaller) sizing factors, and unconfined spaces may not require dedicated combustion air openings at all — confirm which method and space classification applies to your installation with the full code section before finalizing opening size, as this is a single-method screening calculation, not a complete combustion air analysis.

Free area before the 100 in² floor is applied
100 in²

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 100 in² — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Free area is not the size of the hole you cut. A grille or louver passes only its open fraction — roughly three-quarters for metal, as little as a quarter for wood — and an insect screen behind it takes more again, so a 100 in² (645 cm²) free-area requirement can need an opening of 130 to 400 in² (840 to 2,580 cm²) depending on what covers it. Size from the louver's published free area, or the appliance is starved through an opening that measures correctly.
  • The openings only work if the space on the other side is large enough. This method assumes the adjoining room, plus everything freely communicating with it, holds at least 50 ft³ (1.4 m³) per 1,000 BTU/hr (0.3 kW) of combined appliance input; cutting two grilles into the partition of a small closet does not create combustion air, it shares one shortage between two rooms.
  • Nothing here accounts for air being pulled out of the space. A kitchen hood, a clothes dryer or a bath fan can drop the room below atmospheric pressure and reverse an atmospheric flue no matter how generous the openings are, which is how a correctly sized opening still ends with a CO alarm — a house with substantial mechanical exhaust needs the appliance's air supply looked at as a pressure balance, not as an area.

Why the same house gives a different number every year

Radon concentration is a ratio: entry rate over dilution rate. The system attacks the numerator, and the denominator moves on its own for reasons unconnected to it. That is why a house can be mitigated successfully, tested at a comfortable figure, have its windows replaced and its loft hatch draught-stripped two winters later, and re-test higher than on the day the fan was commissioned. What describes the denominator is airtightness, and a blower door reading normalised to the building's own volume is what makes one house comparable with another. Tightening a leaky house removes incidental air change it was getting for nothing, and the same entry rate then produces a higher concentration in the same room. It cuts the other way too: a leaky old house with a very high reading is often one where stack effect is unusually strong, and sealing the top of the building reduces the suction pulling on the floor as well as the dilution. Neither effect is predictable from outside, which is the argument for measuring rather than reasoning.

The operational conclusion belongs in the handover pack. Retest after significant work on the envelope, after a change of heating or ventilation system, and after any alteration that adds an exhaust appliance. The mitigation standards and the national radon programmes make the same recommendation, and both add a periodic retest regardless, because a system that is still humming is not evidence of a system that is still working.

Normalise a blower door reading against the building's own volume, so the tightening that happens between one radon test and the next is a recorded figure rather than the unexplained half of a result that moved.

The total conditioned (heated/cooled) floor area of the building.

The average ceiling height across the conditioned space.

The airflow reading from a blower door test at 50 Pascals of pressure difference.

ACH50 (air changes per hour at 50 Pa)

10.42 ACH50

High confidence

Fairly leaky — typical of an older, un-air-sealed home; many energy codes target under 3-5 ACH50 for new construction.

Building volume
8,640 ft³

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 10.42 ACH50 — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

8 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • ACH50 is leakage measured while a fan holds the building at 50 Pa, not the rate at which air actually changes in service. Real infiltration is a fraction of this figure and varies with wind, stack effect, exposure, shielding and building height, so this result is not a ventilation rate and not a number to feed straight into a heat-loss or plant-sizing calculation.
  • The test behind the reading is run with trickle vents, extract terminals and other intentional openings closed or sealed, so a low result is not evidence the building is ventilated. A dwelling driven down towards the tight end without mechanical ventilation added at the same time has been sealed, not improved.
  • The calculation divides whatever CFM50 you type; it does not check the reading. Temperature and wind correction on the day, a single-point reading versus a multi-point fit, pressurisation versus depressurisation, and how thoroughly the crew sealed intentional openings all move the flow figure, and none of them are visible here.
  • Volume is taken as floor area times average ceiling height, and the fields only reach dwelling scale — a floor area above 1,000 m² (about 10,760 sq ft) or a ceiling above 6 m (about 20 ft) is replaced with the limit. Whether a conditioned basement, a room in the roof or the space between storeys belongs inside the tested volume is settled by the test protocol and by the two numbers you enter, so the ACH50 on a certificate for the same house can differ from this one.
  • This is not a compliance check. It applies no code target, no climate zone and no certification scheme's pass mark, and it does not produce air permeability in m3/(h.m2) of envelope area, which is the figure a UK or European air-leakage test is judged against. The flow field is CFM only, so a certificate quoting m3/h at 50 Pa has to be converted before it goes in the box.

Commissioning, and the five years after it

Two things get fitted at handover and both are cheap. A manometer on the riser, mounted where somebody will look at it, with the commissioned operating point marked on the tube in permanent ink — an unmarked gauge tells nobody anything, because what matters is not the reading but its distance from the day the system worked. And a label carrying the installer, the date, the fan model and the instruction not to switch it off.

The confirmatory measurement comes after a deliberate delay rather than the same afternoon. The room does not jump to its new concentration when the fan starts; it decays towards it at a rate set by the air change of the space, so a basement in a reasonably tight house takes the better part of a day to get most of the way there. That is why the standard sets both a minimum delay after activation and an outside limit on how long the test may be left — read the window in the edition being worked to. Test under the same closed-house conditions as the original, and record the fan model, the manometer reading and where each suction point is, or the next person is hunting for a pit under a carpet.

Failures over the following years are predictable and each writes its own signature. A manometer gone level means the fan has stopped or the pipe has separated, and that reading is the only warning anyone will get. A manometer noticeably higher than the mark with the fan still running means the system is pulling harder against something that has closed: ice at the discharge in a hard winter, or a horizontal leg holding water because its fall was lost when somebody boarded the loft.

A reading lower than the mark means the opposite — the field has opened up. A sump lid unscrewed and never refitted, a floor drain trap dried out over a summer, a new penetration cut through the slab for a shower waste. The fan needs replacing in none of those cases, and it usually gets replaced anyway.

What the van carries for a retrofit mitigation install

A day that begins with diagnostics and ends with a commissioned fan, on a slab that is already down and a floor somebody lives on.

  • Micromanometer resolving to a fraction of a pascal — The communication test is the whole design; an instrument that only reads whole pascals cannot tell a weak field from no field.
  • Vacuum source and test-hole kit with temporary plugs — Small drilled holes at the far corners and behind every interior bearing wall, all of them permanently patched before you leave.
  • Cover meter or scanner, then a wet core drill — Reinforcement, conduits and under-slab heating pipes all sit where a hammer drill would find them the expensive way.
  • Shop vacuum, bent bar and a bucket — The excavated void under the core is the part that decides where the fan sits on its curve; take out more than feels necessary.
  • Solvent-weld pipe in the larger diameter, long-radius bends only — Every horizontal leg falls back to the suction point so condensate drains rather than ponds in the bore.
  • Manometer, system labels and the fan's published curve — The operating point gets marked on the tube at commissioning; an unmarked gauge is a decoration.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • ANSI/AARST SGM-SF, Soil Gas Mitigation Standards for Existing Homes
  • ASTM E2121, Standard Practice for Installing Radon Mitigation Systems in Existing Low-Rise Residential Buildings
  • U.S. EPA, EPA/625/R-93/011, Radon Reduction Techniques for Existing Detached Houses: Technical Guidance
  • U.S. EPA, Consumer's Guide to Radon Reduction, and A Citizen's Guide to Radon
  • ANSI/AARST MAH, Protocol for Conducting Measurements of Radon and Radon Decay Products in Homes
  • World Health Organization, WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective
  • BRE, Surveying dwellings with high indoor radon levels: a guide to radon remedial measures in existing dwellings
  • BRE Report BR 211, Radon: Guidance on Protective Measures for New Buildings
  • Approved Document C, Site Preparation and Resistance to Contaminants and Moisture (England)
  • NFPA 54 / ANSI Z223.1, National Fuel Gas Code, and the International Fuel Gas Code, combustion air provisions
  • NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and BS 7671, Requirements for Electrical Installations
  • Published fan performance curves from radon fan manufacturers, including RadonAway, Fantech and Festa

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.