Glazing

Lifting and Setting Heavy Glass

A panel schedule arrives in millimetres and has to leave in kilograms, unit by unit, before anyone decides what two pairs of hands can take.
  • 16 minReading time
  • 8Sections
  • 4Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

A Panel Schedule Is a Weights List Nobody Wrote Down

The fabricator sends back a table of widths, heights and make-up codes — 2440 by 1050, 6/16/6.8, twelve off — and there is not a kilogram anywhere on it. That is not an oversight. Glass is sold by area, and the make-up code describes an optical and thermal specification rather than a handling one. Everything you have to decide, though, is decided in kilograms: how many people meet the lorry, whether a unit goes up a stair or waits for a machine, which cups come out of the van, and whether the word crane belongs anywhere in the programme. That conversion has to happen while the delivery date is still negotiable.

The code is worth reading properly, because it tells you exactly where the mass sits. A 6/16/6.8 unit is a 6 mm outboard lite, a 16 mm sealed cavity, and a 6.8 mm laminated inboard made from two 3 mm plies bonded by a 0.76 mm interlayer. Two of those numbers are most of the weight, one is a thin polymer film that adds less than a kilogram to the square metre, and the cavity contributes essentially nothing — argon in a 16 mm gap comes to under thirty grams per square metre, against the thirty-odd kilograms the two glass sides come to between them. Thickness in the code is not the same thing as mass in the code, and the units that surprise crews are the ones where a fat cavity made a light panel look heavy or a thin laminate made a heavy one look light.

Two separate figures come out of the arithmetic and different people use them. Per-unit mass settles the handling method one unit at a time, and it is the number that ought to be printed on the crate label before the glass leaves the works. Aggregate mass settles the logistics: what the loaded stillage weighs, what the tail lift is rated to take, and what a suspended slab is being asked to hold while forty units stand on their edges waiting to be glazed.

What the make-up code is describing

A double-glazed unit taken apart through its thickness: the outboard lite first, then the sealed cavity held open by its spacer, then the two plies of the laminated inboard with the interlayer bonding them together.
  1. Outboard lite — usually the toughened or heat-strengthened face, and the one a vacuum cup will sit on, so its surface condition matters as much as its thickness Architectural Glass Weight Calculator
  2. Sealed cavity and spacer — more than half the overall thickness of a 6/16/6.8 unit and almost none of its weight, which is why a fat unit and a heavy unit are not the same unit
  3. Laminate, outer ply — the first of the two bonded lites on the inboard side, counted separately because the weight arithmetic multiplies a ply by a ply count Structural Glass Panel Weight Calculator
  4. Interlayer — the layer the weight sum leaves out; at roughly a kilogram per square metre it is small, but it is the difference between a tidy estimate and a right one
  5. Laminate, inner ply — the room-side ply, and on a broken unit the one still holding the fragments together long after the outboard face has gone Structural Glass Panel Weight Calculator

Everything further down this page is settled in kilograms, so the make-up code has to become a number first — enter one ply and let the ply count do its own multiplication, because a laminate entered as a single combined thickness doubles itself.

The width of the glass panel.

The height of the glass panel.

The thickness of a single glass ply/lite, before lamination.

The number of glass layers laminated together in the panel.

Glass panel weight

230.8 lb

High confidence

This calculates WEIGHT ONLY, for handling and rigging planning — it is NOT a structural adequacy calculator. Never select glass thickness or lamination for a load-bearing application (walkways, guards, floors) from this or any generic calculator — structural glass design requires ASTM E1300/E2751/E2752 and a licensed engineer using the specific manufacturer's certified glass strength data.

3.5 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The panel weight is not the lifting weight, and a vacuum lifter's headline rating is not its rating for this pick. Add the lifter head, spreader beam, slings and any carrier frame into the gross load, then check the manufacturer's derating for the number of pads actually in contact and for the panel's ORIENTATION — a cup set rated at one figure with the glass horizontal is commonly rated far lower once it is tilted to vertical, which is the position it goes into the opening in.
  • Weight tells you nothing about where it lands. All of that mass sits on two setting blocks, so the sill, lintel or slab edge underneath takes it as a pair of concentrated loads over a short bearing, and the head above has to hold a glazing deflection limit — typically on the order of span over 175 with an absolute cap — because a frame that sags onto the glass edge is what cracks the pane. Check the support, not just the glass.

Nominal Thickness, Actual Thickness, and the Film in Between

The density is the one part of this that is not in dispute. EN 572-1, Glass in building — Basic soda lime silicate glass products, gives soda-lime glass a density of 2,500 kg/m³, and every architectural weight figure on this site is built on it. Thickness is looser than the code implies: ASTM C1036, Standard Specification for Flat Glass, tabulates a permitted range for each nominal designation rather than a single dimension, and EN 572-2 does the same for float. A batch of nominal 6 mm can measure either side of six, which is a percent or two on the mass of every unit in it. That is not a reason to distrust the arithmetic; it is a reason not to plan a lift that only works if the glass comes in at the bottom of its tolerance.

The interlayer is the term most estimates quietly drop. Polyvinyl butyral runs near 1.07 g/cm³ on the interlayer makers' own data sheets, so a 0.76 mm film adds about 0.8 kg to every square metre and a 1.52 mm film about 1.6 kg. On one lite that is nothing. On a three-metre laminated fin it is several kilograms, and on a hoist load of forty units it is the difference between a stillage that is inside its rating and one that is not. Ionoplast interlayers sit at a different density again, and that figure belongs to the product data sheet rather than to a rule of thumb. The runner higher up this page counts glass and only glass, which is exact for a monolithic lite and light by about eight-tenths of a kilogram per square metre on anything laminated with a 0.76 film — add that back by hand, or know that the number you are holding is the low one. Note what the table below does to two very different make-ups: a 12.8 mm laminate and a 6/16/6.8 double-glazed unit weigh the same to a tenth of a kilogram, which is worth knowing before somebody assumes the double-glazed one is the heavier job.

Mass at the 2,500 kg/m³ EN 572-1 gives for soda-lime glass, with the interlayer counted
Make-upMass per m²A 1.20 × 2.40 m lite
4 mm monolithic10.0 kg28.8 kg
6 mm monolithic15.0 kg43.2 kg
10 mm monolithic25.0 kg72.0 kg
6.8 mm laminate (2 × 3 mm + 0.76 PVB)15.8 kg45.5 kg
12.8 mm laminate (2 × 6 mm + 0.76 PVB)30.8 kg88.7 kg
6/16/6.8 double-glazed unit30.8 kg88.7 kg
Mass at the 2,500 kg/m³ EN 572-1 gives for soda-lime glass, with the interlayer counted

Where Twenty-Three Kilograms Comes From, and Why Glass Never Earns It

The number sitting in most manual-handling conversations traces back to the load constant in the revised NIOSH lifting equation, published in the Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation, NIOSH Publication 94-110. Twenty-three kilograms is not a limit; it is the mass an ideal lift could take, and ideal means the load starts at knuckle height, sits against the body, is lifted without twisting, has proper handles, and is not repeated all shift. From there a series of multipliers cut the figure down to a recommended weight limit for the lift you are actually doing. The constant is the ceiling before any of the site is taken into account.

Glass loses on nearly every multiplier at once. There are no handles, so the coupling term is poor even with hand cups — and a hand cup is a handling aid, not rated lifting equipment, a distinction that matters the moment anyone suggests hanging one on a hook. The panel's own width forces the load away from the trunk, because you cannot bring a 1,200 mm lite close to your chest and still see past it, and its length has you carrying at arm's reach to keep it off your shins. The unit starts on a stillage at floor level and finishes at cill height or above. And the lift almost always ends with a twist through a reveal or a doorway. A 23 kg constant can come down to a fraction of itself before the maths is finished.

Other regimes reach for the same problem differently and are worth knowing by name. ISO 11228-1, Ergonomics — Manual handling — Lifting and carrying, works from a reference mass for the population doing the work, taking 25 kg for the general working population and lower figures where the group needs more protection. In the United Kingdom, the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 and the HSE guidance published with them, Manual Handling: Guidance on Regulations (L23), set guideline filter figures that fall away sharply as the load moves out from the body or above shoulder height, and treat a two-person team as capable of about two-thirds of the sum of what the two could each handle alone — three people, about half the sum. Two glaziers are not two glaziers' worth of capacity, and that derating is the single most misunderstood point on any glass job. OSHA publishes no numeric lifting limit at all; handling injuries in the United States are pursued under Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the general duty clause, which obliges the employer to deal with a recognised hazard without telling anyone what the number is.

None of which lets you off the decision. The threshold you work to is yours, and it has to be defensible from the crew you have, the route they walk, the grip they will get and how many times they will do it before the shift ends. Write it down, apply it to every line of the schedule, and let the failures sort themselves into the units that need a machine. A threshold chosen after a unit has been dropped is not a threshold.

Set the threshold your method genuinely supports — two glaziers, a cup each side, fifteen units before the delivery leaves — then run the schedule past it, because the lines that fail are the ones that put plant on the booking sheet.

The area of the glass panel to be lifted.

The nominal thickness of the glass panel.

The density of the glass, typically about 2500 kg/m³ (156 pcf) for standard soda-lime glass.

The maximum weight considered safe for manual lifting given the crew and technique planned.

Glass panel weight

52.5 lb

ComparisonA comparison, not a check — no result here is an approval.

This panel weighs is above the safe manual lift threshold shown with it — you entered it from your own manual handling assessment. This needs checking by a qualified person before you proceed. This is arithmetic against the figure you entered, not a lift plan. The appointed person and the manufacturer's chart decide whether and how the lift proceeds.

Safe lift threshold
50 lb

What this calculation does not cover

  • Weight is not the only thing that makes a lift unsafe. A panel's size decides whether it can be gripped at all and whether it must be carried at arm's length: The same weight in a 600 mm (2 ft) square is a different lift from that weight in a 3 m (10 ft) length, and this compares only the mass.
  • The default density is soda-lime float glass at 2,500 kg/m³ (156 pcf). A laminated build-up includes an interlayer that weighs less per unit of thickness than glass, so entering the full laminated thickness at glass density over-states the weight.
  • Nothing about the lifting method. No suction-cup rating, no allowance for wind on a panel being carried outdoors, no account of surface condition — a panel inside the threshold can still be dropped.
  • The threshold is your own number. This site does not know the safe manual handling limit for a given person, posture, grip or jurisdiction, and does not supply one.

Grip Is a Separate Sum From Weight

A vacuum lifter's rating belongs to an orientation and a surface, not to the device. The same head that holds a panel flat, with the pads pulling in pure tension, is rated differently once the panel is turned upright and the seal is being asked to resist shear down the face. Manufacturers publish both figures and the derating between them; the plate on the device is the one that governs, and a rating remembered from a different head on a different job is worth nothing. EN 13155, Cranes — Safety — Non-fixed load lifting attachments, is the standard behind the reserve a compliant vacuum lifter has to demonstrate in Europe, while in North America ASME B30.20, Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices, covers vacuum lifting devices as a class and ASME BTH-1, Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices, sets the design categories and service classes the rating is calculated against.

Then there is the surface, which no rating can promise you. A pad seals against clean, smooth, dry glass at a sensible temperature. It does markedly less well on ceramic frit, on sandblasted or patterned faces, on some self-cleaning and pyrolytic coatings, on a unit that has been standing in frost, and on anything carrying the dust of a site that has been cutting blockwork upwind. Cold glass and a cold pad are a different pairing from the warm sample in the yard where the head was demonstrated. Check the seal on the actual panel, in the actual orientation, and listen to the gauge rather than the sales figure.

The rest is procedure and it is unglamorous. Reserve capacity and an audible alarm so a falling vacuum announces itself; a battery or tank that has been checked this morning rather than this month; the device inspected on its stated interval with the record available; nobody underneath a suspended panel at any point; and no unit left hanging on cups while the crew goes to find a shim. The failure mode of a vacuum lifter is not a gradual sag. It is a panel arriving at the floor, and the difference between toughened and laminated decides whether you are sweeping up dice or carrying away a sheet that is still in one piece — which is why the make-up matters to the safety case and not only to the weight.

A Large Lite Is a Sail Long Before It Is a Load

Glass is heavy for its thickness and light for its face area, and wind cares only about face area. Three metres by one and a half is four and a half square metres of flat plate presented to a gust, and a flat plate is a poor shape to be holding — the drag factor for a panel is not the general value used for a compact load, and the coefficient that governs comes from the standard the lift plan is written under or from the crane manufacturer's own guidance. The gust that counts is the one at the height the unit will hang, not the average beside the site cabin, and every machine has a maximum permissible wind speed printed for its configuration.

Rotation is the part that catches people. A panel presented edge-on to the wind is barely loaded until it is allowed to turn, and then it finds its face on its own. Control comes from tag lines attached to the lifting frame or the head, never to the glass, and from keeping the fall short so the pendulum has less to work with. On a hand-carried panel the same physics applies with nobody to help: a gust across an open podium takes the panel and the glazier with it, which is why an outdoor manual carry has a wind limit as surely as a crane pick does.

Mechanical handling inside the building brings its own arithmetic. Glazing robots and mini spider cranes work off a slab that was designed for occupancy rather than for a tracked machine and its counterweight, and the loads a structure sees during construction are the subject of ASCE/SEI 37, Design Loads on Structures During Construction. Outriggers on a finished floor need spreading and the floor needs a check by someone entitled to make it. The capacity chart falls away with reach exactly as any crane's does, so the unit at the far corner of the atrium is not the unit the machine was chosen for.

Take the face area the unit will actually present, the gust reading at working height, and a drag factor honest about a flat panel: what comes back is the horizontal push the tag lines have to hold and how far off vertical the unit will hang while they do it.

The area the load presents to the wind, seen along the wind direction.

The gust speed at the height the load will actually hang, not the average at ground level.

The drag coefficient for the load's shape, from the standard governing the lift plan.

The density of the air the lift takes place in.

The weight of the item hanging below the hook.

The length of hoist rope between the boom head and the load.

The horizontal distance from the crane's centre of rotation to the load.

Horizontal wind force on the load

798 lbf

Medium confidence

A static description of one gust on one orientation. It does not model the load swinging, rotating into its worst face, or the wind acting on the boom and the crane itself, all of which the manufacturer's permissible wind speed already accounts for — that limit governs, not this arithmetic.

Wind pressure on the sail area
6.14 lbf/ft²
Angle the load hangs off vertical
6.88 °
Sideways offset of the load
3.95 ft
Added moment from the offset
26.15 kip·ft
Moment about the slew centre if the wind blows across the boom
52.68 kip·ft
Load moment at the radius with no wind
436.59 kip·ft

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 798 lbf — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

132 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Covers the load only. Wind on the boom, the jib and the machine is part of the manufacturer's stability case and is not computed here.
  • Assumes a steady gust on a fixed orientation. A load free to rotate will find its largest face, and a dynamic swing overshoots the static angle.
  • The manufacturer's maximum permissible wind speed for the configuration is a limit, not a target, and no calculated force overrides it.
  • Tag lines change the picture: they resist swing but transfer that force to whoever is holding them, which is its own hazard in a rising wind.

Between the Lorry and the Opening

Glass travels on edge because that is the direction it is stiff in, and every stillage, A-frame and dolly on the job exists to keep it that way. Laid flat and unsupported in the middle, a large lite is a beam with no depth; picked up flat by two people at the ends, it flexes visibly and the flex is not the danger — the danger is what the flex does to a nicked edge. Edge damage is the failure that arrives late. A chip taken off a corner on the pavement becomes a crack across the unit two weeks after glazing, by which time everybody has agreed the glass must have been faulty.

The route is a survey, not an assumption. Door widths matter less than door diagonals, thresholds trip dollies, lift cars have a stated diagonal that decides whether a unit goes in the car or up the stairwell, and a stair with a half-landing has a turning circle that no drawing shows. Where the units wait matters too: a loaded stillage is a concentrated line of load on whatever it stands on, and forty units standing on a suspended slab is a temporary works question rather than a housekeeping one.

Do the walk before the delivery, with a tape and the largest unit's dimensions written on your hand. The list below is what that walk is for.

  1. Measure the diagonal of the largest unit, not its width — that is the number every doorway, lift car and stair turn is judged against.
  2. Walk the route from the tail lift to the opening, both ways, noting thresholds, floor boxes, wet screed and anything that will still be there on delivery day.
  3. Confirm where the stillages stand and who has checked that the floor takes them, with the answer in writing if the slab is suspended.
  4. Check the lift car's rated load against the unit plus the dolly plus the crew, and its internal diagonal against the unit on the diagonal.
  5. Identify the point on the route where the unit has to change orientation, because that is where the manual-handling assessment is either satisfied or broken.
  6. Agree the abort position: where a unit goes down safely, upright and blocked, if the carry has to stop halfway.

Setting the Unit: the Moment the Weight Changes Hands

The set is the transfer, and it is the part of the operation where the mass you calculated stops being carried by cups and starts being carried by two small blocks of rubber. Setting blocks take the entire dead weight of the unit for the rest of its life. ASTM C864, Standard Specification for Dense Elastomeric Compression Seal Gaskets, Setting Blocks, and Spacers, covers the material; the GANA Glazing Manual, published by the National Glass Association, covers where they go and how big they are: a pair standing on the sill, each set in from its own end by about a quarter of the width, with length, width and durometer chosen for the load that will stand on them for the next thirty years. Where the fabricator's detail differs, the detail wins.

On an insulating unit both lites have to be sitting on the block. A block that supports the inboard lite and misses the outboard one hangs the outer pane on nothing but the perimeter seal, which then carries in shear a load nobody designed it for — keeping the cavity dry is the whole of that seal's job. The unit that fogs in year three is very often the unit that was set on a block half a millimetre too narrow. Hardness follows the same logic in the other direction: too soft and the block creeps under a heavy unit until the glass finds the frame, too hard and it becomes a point that concentrates load into the edge.

Sequence the transfer so that nothing is held by hand at the moment it could pinch. The unit lands on the blocks, the crew confirms contact and edge clearance all round, and only then do the cups come off. Releasing while a hand is in the reveal is how the standard glazing injury happens, and it happens to experienced people because the panel behaves predictably right up until it does not. Toughened glass in particular gives no warning: it either holds or it becomes a heap, with nothing in between.

Blocks are also a counting problem, and a trivially solvable one. Two per opening over a whole floor — and on an insulating unit that one pair carries both panes, so it stays two and not four — is a number somebody should have ordered with the glass, in the right durometer, with spares. They are small, they get lost in packaging, and a set stops dead without them.

  1. Confirm the block size, hardness and material against the fabricator's detail before the first unit is offered up, not after.
  2. Check that each block bears across the full make-up thickness, outboard lite included, before any weight comes onto it.
  3. Bring the unit down slowly and square, never sliding it sideways once it is bearing and never prising against the frame to nudge it over.
  4. Check edge clearance and face clearance all round while the lifter still has the unit, because correcting position afterwards means picking it up again.
  5. Release the cups deliberately, with hands out of the reveal, and confirm the unit is stable and captured before anyone steps away.
  6. Log the unit as set, with anything noticed about its edges, so a later breakage has a history rather than a guess attached to it.

Blocks are the last item anyone remembers and the first that stops a set — count them against the lite schedule so the box arrives with the glass instead of the week after.

The total number of glass lites or windows to be set.

The number of setting blocks placed beneath each lite.

Total setting blocks needed

80 setting blocks

High confidence

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The result is a count, not a size and not a load check. Setting block length, width and hardness are chosen from the weight and area of the lite and the bearing stress the block can carry, and a block narrower than the full glass edge will load only one pane of an insulating unit instead of the spacer and both panes; none of that is tested by multiplying lites by blocks, and the dimensions and durometer come from the glass manufacturer's glazing instructions.
  • A single blocks-per-lite figure is applied to every lite in the batch, and the input accepts only two to four. A mixed order in which the oversized lites take four blocks and the rest take two must be run as two separate calculations and the totals added, and a lite whose manufacturer calls for more than four blocks cannot be entered at all. The total is an exact product, with no spare blocks added for units dropped, cut wrong or lost on site.
  • Nothing here positions the blocks. The quarter-point placement the calculation assumes, the edge clearance the block sets between glass and frame, and the rule that a block must never sit across a weep hole or dam the glazing pocket are all outside the count, and a correct quantity fitted in the wrong place still traps water against the edge seal.
  • Only the blocks that carry the lite on its bottom edge are counted. Side blocks and anti-walk blocks on operable sashes, top blocking, and the shims and spacers used to centre the glass in the pocket are separate items and are not included in this total.
  • Block material is not considered anywhere in the calculation. An elastomer incompatible with the glazing sealant can stain the edge seal of an insulating unit or inhibit the cure of structural silicone, so the compatible compound has to be specified from the sealant manufacturer's compatibility data independently of the quantity.

What the Next Crew Inherits

Ask the fabricator to mark unit mass on the label. It costs them a field in a database and it removes the entire arithmetic from the site, permanently, for every unit they ever send you. Where the label does not carry it, put it there yourself when the schedule is priced up and before the units are wrapped — a weight written on the crate is read by the person lifting, and a weight in a spreadsheet in the office is not.

The handling method for a glass job is short enough to fit on a page and is worth having on one: the threshold above which a unit is not carried, the crew size against each class of unit, which cups and lifters are on site with their ratings and inspection dates, the wind limit for outdoor handling, the route with its known pinch points, and the name of everyone entitled to stop the operation. Most of that is decided once for the project and applies to every unit; the value is that a new pair of hands on a Tuesday morning inherits the decisions instead of re-making them at the tail lift.

Keep the record thin but real. Which units went mechanically and why, the cup inspection dates, a damage log filled in at delivery rather than at practical completion, and the reason any unit was refused. Glass failures argue themselves out months later between the fabricator, the installer and the main contractor, and the only party who wins that argument is the one who wrote down what the panel weighed, what held it, and what it was standing on when the crack was first seen.

Settled before the glass is booked in

The schedule turns into a handling plan in this order — mass per unit first, then the threshold, then the units that fail it.

  • Mass for every line of the schedule — Per unit and per make-up, with the interlayer counted, worked from nominal thickness and not from the overall unit dimension.
  • A written manual-handling threshold — Justified by crew size, route, grip and repetition — and derated for team handling rather than doubled for a second person.
  • The list of units that fail it — Every line above the threshold, with the mechanical method named against it: cup and hoist, glazing robot, spider crane or full crane pick.
  • Lifter ratings in the orientation of use — Vertical and horizontal figures from the device plate, with inspection dates, plus the surface conditions each panel type presents to the pad.
  • Route survey and stillage positions — Diagonals rather than widths, lift car load and internal diagonal, and a checked answer on any suspended floor the stillages stand on.
  • Setting blocks with the glass order — Two per opening as a minimum, one pair carrying both panes of an insulating unit, sized to the fabricator's detail, in the right hardness, with spares.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • EN 572-1, Glass in building — Basic soda lime silicate glass products — Definitions and general physical and mechanical properties
  • EN 572-2, Glass in building — Basic soda lime silicate glass products — Float glass
  • ASTM C1036, Standard Specification for Flat Glass
  • ASTM C1048, Standard Specification for Heat-Strengthened and Fully Tempered Flat Glass
  • ASTM C1172, Standard Specification for Laminated Architectural Flat Glass
  • EN 14449, Glass in building — Laminated glass and laminated safety glass — Evaluation of conformity
  • ASTM E2190, Standard Specification for Insulating Glass Unit Performance and Evaluation
  • ASTM C864, Standard Specification for Dense Elastomeric Compression Seal Gaskets, Setting Blocks, and Spacers
  • ASTM E1300, Standard Practice for Determining Load Resistance of Glass in Buildings
  • ANSI Z97.1, Safety Glazing Materials Used in Buildings — Safety Performance Specifications and Methods of Test
  • GANA Glazing Manual, National Glass Association
  • NIOSH Publication 94-110, Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation
  • ISO 11228-1, Ergonomics — Manual handling — Part 1: Lifting and carrying
  • Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 (as amended), United Kingdom, with HSE guidance L23, Manual Handling: Guidance on Regulations
  • Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Section 5(a)(1), the general duty clause
  • EN 13155, Cranes — Safety — Non-fixed load lifting attachments
  • ASME B30.20, Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices
  • ASME BTH-1, Design of Below-the-Hook Lifting Devices
  • ASME B30.9, Slings
  • ASCE/SEI 37, Design Loads on Structures During Construction

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.