SettingsSettings for this calculationUS
The weight hanging below the hook, as weighed or as certified.
Use a weighed figure wherever one exists. A weight carried forward from a similar item, taken from a drawing that predates a design change, or estimated from a material list is the classic late discovery on a lift, and it is discovered at the worst possible moment — when the load is already off the ground.
How many legs of the sling assembly are attached to the load.
Attaching four legs does not mean four legs carry. On a rigid load with fixed-length legs the assembly is statically indeterminate, and manufacturers and rigging practice both say to credit only two unless the arrangement demonstrably equalises. The breakdown reports that case alongside the equal-share one so the difference is visible rather than assumed away.
The angle between a sling leg and the horizontal plane of the load.
Measured from the horizontal, so ninety degrees is a straight vertical pull and small angles are shallow, wide-spread legs. Tension climbs steeply as the angle falls, and common rigging practice sets a hard floor at thirty degrees. If a sling has to be shallower than that, the answer is a longer sling or a spreader beam, not a bigger sling.
How far the centre of gravity sits from the midpoint, as a share of the span between attachment points.
Zero means the centre of gravity is exactly between the lift points and the load hangs level. Twenty percent means it sits a fifth of the span toward one side, which puts seventy percent of the weight on that side rather than fifty. Motors, transformers and anything with a heavy end are never symmetric, and a load that hangs visibly out of level on the first trial lift is telling you this number is not zero.
Tension in the most heavily loaded leg
1,270 lbf
With more than two legs the equal-share figure is the optimistic case. Compare it against the two-leg line in the breakdown, and use the two-leg figure unless the arrangement genuinely equalises.
- Load angle factor at this sling angle
- 1.15 multiplier
- Vertical share carried by the most heavily loaded leg
- 1,102.5 lbf
- Tension if only two legs are credited
- 2,546.11 lbf
- Minimum rated capacity needed for each leg
- 2,546.11 lb
- Sideways pull into the load at each attachment
- 636.53 lbf
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Sling Leg Tension and Angle Factor Calculator: 1,273 lbf — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Show calculation logicHide calculation logic
How this was calculated
Formula source(s)
- ASME B30.9, Slings — sling capacity is rated for the angle of use, and a multi-leg sling on a rigid load is not credited with sharing equally across more than two legs unless the arrangement is known to equalise
- Leg tension = vertical share ÷ sin(angle to horizontal); the load angle factor is 1 ÷ sin(angle), so a leg at 30 degrees carries twice the vertical load it supports
- Centre-of-gravity share: for lift points in symmetric pairs, the heavier side carries (0.5 + offset) of the load, where the offset is expressed as a fraction of the distance between the pairs
Inputs used
- Weight of the Load
- 4410 lb
- Legs Sharing the Load
- Four legs
- Sling Angle to the Horizontal (degrees)
- 60
- Centre-of-Gravity Offset (% of the distance between lift points)
- 0
Intermediate steps
- Load angle factor at this sling angle
- 1.15 multiplier
- Vertical share carried by the most heavily loaded leg
- 1,102.5 lbf
- Tension if only two legs are credited
- 2,546.11 lbf
- Minimum rated capacity needed for each leg
- 2,546.11 lb
- Sideways pull into the load at each attachment
- 636.53 lbf
Confidence note: With more than two legs the equal-share figure is the optimistic case. Compare it against the two-leg line in the breakdown, and use the two-leg figure unless the arrangement genuinely equalises.
What this calculation does not cover
- Sizes the sling legs only. Shackles, the master link, the lifting points on the load and the structure behind them each have their own rating, and the assembly is governed by the smallest of them.
- Applies no design factor. A sling's working load limit already includes one, so the tension here is compared against the rated capacity at the angle of use, never against a breaking strength.
- Static only. Snatching a load, freeing one that is stuck, hoisting fast or swinging hard all put forces through the rigging that this figure does not contemplate.
- Says nothing about the crane. Rigging weight is a deduction from the chart capacity, and this page does not compute what remains for the load.
Add the equipment this sizes
This result is a specification — 1,270 lbf — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.
Computed in your browser — nothing you enter is uploaded. Presented in US customary units and US trade terminology. Where a formula follows a published standard, that standard and its edition are cited beside it on this page; where none governs, the page says so. Local amendments override model codes — verify against the code in force where you build.
Sources checked 2026-09-06 · in the site-wide review of 2026-09-06 · v1.0.1
Regulatory standards & verification citations3
- ASME B30.9, Slings — sling capacity is rated for the angle of use, and a multi-leg sling on a rigid load is not credited with sharing equally across more than two legs unless the arrangement is known to equalise
- Leg tension = vertical share ÷ sin(angle to horizontal); the load angle factor is 1 ÷ sin(angle), so a leg at 30 degrees carries twice the vertical load it supports
- Centre-of-gravity share: for lift points in symmetric pairs, the heavier side carries (0.5 + offset) of the load, where the offset is expressed as a fraction of the distance between the pairs
Cite this page
Your workspace
Most jobs need more than one number. Add the calculators you need next and they open right here, underneath this one — your figures stay on screen and nothing is lost to a page change.