Heating

Adding Radiators to an Existing Heating System

An extension off the existing boiler is four separate capacity questions, and the appliance is only the first and usually the least interesting of them.
  • 20 minReading time
  • 13Sections
  • 7Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

The boiler was sized for a smaller house

A single-storey rear extension, four by five metres, two new radiators, and a client who wants to know whether the boiler in the utility room will cope. It is the most common heating question on any domestic building job, and it gets answered wrong in both directions: by a merchant who says a 24 kW appliance will run anything, and by an engineer who quotes for a new boiler because that is the safe reply to a question nobody has worked out.

The reply worth having comes from four independent checks, and only the first is about the appliance. The heat source has to have output left after the existing house has taken what it needs. The leg feeding the new rooms has to carry the flow that output implies without howling. The circulator has to have head left for a circuit longer than the one it was set up for. And the sealed system's water content has just gone up, which the expansion vessel and the inhibitor dose both care about.

Any one of the four can be the constraint, and on a real house it is very rarely the boiler. Work out which one bites before you price anything: the fix for a bore problem and the fix for an output problem are different jobs at different prices, and guessing between them is how a quote becomes a variation.

What the new rooms actually ask for

An extension is not an average of the house it hangs off. It is a small volume with a very high ratio of exposed envelope to floor area — three new external walls, a new roof, a new ground floor and, on almost every job of this kind, far more glass per square metre than anywhere else in the building. That geometry is why a rule of thumb calibrated on whole houses reads low on extensions, and reads low exactly where the client will notice: the room with the bifold doors in it.

So compute the fabric loss surface by surface. Heat transmission through each element is its area multiplied by its U-value multiplied by the design temperature difference, and the reason for splitting it is that the U-values differ by an order of magnitude across a single extension: a current-standard wall, a rooflight and a large glazed unit are three completely different rates of loss occupying the same envelope. Run each and add them. That build-up is what ACCA Manual J formalises for residential work in North America and what the CIBSE Domestic Heating Design Guide sets out in the UK.

Two inputs decide whether the answer is worth anything. The first is the design outdoor temperature, a statistical condition published for the location — ASHRAE Handbook, Fundamentals carries the climatic design data used across North America, and the CIBSE design data serves the same purpose in the UK. It is neither the coldest night on record nor last winter's average. The second is glazing: use the U-value from the unit's own certification, because the spread across products sold as double glazed is wide enough to change the radiator size.

Then check what the new opening does to the room it was cut into. Knocking through usually means the old external wall has become an internal one and the room behind is open to a much larger volume with a much larger loss, while its existing radiator was sized for the room that used to be there. Take the loss for the combined space, or the extension will be warm and the kitchen behind it will not.

Run it once per surface — wall, roof, floor, each glazing type — because the rates of loss across a single extension differ by an order of magnitude and averaging them hides the loss the client will feel. It asks for each assembly's R-value rather than its U-value, and in imperial units: a certified glazing U-value of 1.4 W/m²K is 0.71 m²K/W of resistance, which is the 4.1 the field wants.

The area of the specific wall, window, roof, or floor surface being analyzed.

The insulating R-value of this specific surface assembly.

Your target indoor temperature.

Your region's extreme winter (or summer) design temperature, not the average.

Heat transmission load

944 BTU/hr

Medium confidence

This computes conductive transmission loss through one surface using standard physics — a complete Manual J (or Manual N/CIBSE-equivalent) whole-building load calculation also accounts for air infiltration, internal gains, solar gain, and every surface combined.

U-value
0.08 BTU/hr·ft²·°F
Equivalent in watts
276.75 W

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 944 BTU/hr — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

14.83 ft4.52 m14.83 ft4.52 mequivalent area220 sq ft20.44 m²5 ft2 m

What this calculation does not cover

  • Conduction through one surface, nothing else. Air leakage and ventilation, solar gain through glass, internal gains from people, lighting and appliances, latent (humidity) load, and duct or distribution losses are all outside the formula. Run it on every surface and add the results and you still have a transmission subtotal, not a heating or cooling load.
  • This is not a Manual J, Manual N or CIBSE-equivalent load calculation and it is not a basis for selecting or sizing equipment. Where a jurisdiction, utility programme or inspector requires a load calculation, it will require a recognised whole-building method, not a per-surface transmission figure.
  • The R-value is taken at face value. Thermal bridging through framing and fasteners, gaps and compressed insulation, wind washing at the edges, and the R-value loss some foams show at cold temperatures all put the real assembly below its nominal rating, and none of them are modelled here. Interior and exterior air films are not added either.
  • Steady state, and a rate rather than a quantity. It answers what the surface loses at the instant both design temperatures hold; thermal mass, night setback and the daily temperature swing are absent, so the figure cannot be multiplied by hours to get fuel use, runtime or a bill.
  • Surfaces that do not face outdoor air are out of scope. A slab, a basement wall or a floor over a crawl space exchanges heat against ground and buffer-space temperatures on a different basis, and the outdoor field clamps to −40 °C to 45 °C (−40 °F to 113 °F), a range that reaches neither a summer attic nor the coldest published design conditions in the far north.

Air in and air out

Fabric loss is the part everybody calculates and it is not the whole load. Heating outside air up to room temperature costs energy too, and on a new extension that air arrives from two directions: a designed supply, because building regulations require ventilation provision for new habitable space, and an undesigned one through the junction between new work and old.

The designed part is a known airflow and behaves like arithmetic. The undesigned part does not, and no calculation improves it — the remedy is at the junction where the new roof meets the old wall, where the new floor meets the old footing, and around every service drilled through in the last fortnight. Sealing that line is cheaper than the radiator you would otherwise fit to cover for it, and it gets harder to reach every week the programme runs on.

Headroom is not the number on the badge

Now take the total to the appliance, and read its data plate rather than its marketing. The kilowatt figure in a combination boiler's model name is usually its domestic hot water output, which has nothing to do with what it can put into radiators; the central heating output is stated separately in the installation manual and is often a good deal lower. On a system or heat-only boiler the heating output is the only figure, but net and gross input still get quoted alongside it and neither is output.

Maximum output is rarely the limit that bites on a domestic extension. Minimum output usually is, and it works the other way round from most people's intuition: below its minimum firing rate a modulating boiler cannot run steadily, so it cycles. Adding two radiators to a system already oversized for its house therefore tends to improve the appliance's behaviour. The failure mode to watch for is the opposite one — an extension on its own zone valve, calling alone, presenting the boiler with a load far below its minimum and setting it cycling every few minutes all spring.

Hot water changes the picture on any appliance that also makes it. A combi stops heating entirely for the duration of a draw-off; a system boiler with an unvented cylinder normally runs hot water priority. Neither is a fault, and both mean the boiler is not putting its full output into radiators for as long as anyone is running a tap. Where the appliance is close to its ceiling, use the manufacturer's own output table at the flow and return pair you intend to run — and any work on the appliance itself is for someone registered to do it, under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations in the UK or the equivalent regime elsewhere.

A whole-house rule of thumb still has one use here, which is as a sanity check on the surface-by-surface total. Area multiplied by a climate-dependent rate per square metre is not how anything gets specified and it knows nothing about your glazing, but if it and your calculated total for the enlarged house disagree by a factor of two, one of them contains a mistake and it is worth finding out which before ordering emitters.

An area-and-climate rule of thumb specifies nothing, but run it across the enlarged floor area as a cross-check: if it and your surface-by-surface total differ by a factor, go back and find out which one is wrong.

The total heated floor area of the home.

Colder climates need more BTU/hr per square foot.

Recommended furnace size

64,000 BTU/hr

Low confidence

This is a rough rule-of-thumb estimate. A professional Manual J load calculation, which accounts for insulation, windows, orientation, ceiling height, and local design temperatures, gives a far more accurate furnace size — oversizing wastes energy and causes short-cycling, while undersizing can't keep up on the coldest days.

House area
1,610 sq ft

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 64,000 BTU/hr — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

40.12 ft12.23 m40.12 ft12.23 mequivalent area1,610 sq ft149.57 m²20 ft5 m

What this calculation does not cover

  • This is not a load calculation. Nothing about the building envelope enters the arithmetic - insulation levels, window area and orientation, air leakage, wall and roof construction, or how exposed the house is. Two houses of the same floor area can have real heating loads that differ by a factor, which is why equipment selection and duct design are based on a room-by-room load calculation rather than on a number like this one.
  • The three climate bands are the entire climate model. There is no outdoor design temperature, no indoor setpoint and no local weather data, so a single "cold" setting is applied to a house in the mild edge of a cold zone and to one in the coldest part of it at the same rate per square foot.
  • Only floor area is counted. Ceiling height and room volume, a vaulted or double-height space, a floor over an unheated basement or crawl space, and a top storey under a poorly insulated roof all carry load that a per-square-foot rule never sees.
  • The result is a heat requirement, not an equipment selection. It applies no sizing margin, names no model, and takes no account of elevation - gas furnace output is derated above a stated altitude by the manufacturer, and that derate belongs to the equipment rather than to this figure. Matching it to a furnace also means working from the output rating rather than the fuel input rating the unit is sold by.
  • Nothing here covers the rest of the installation: duct capacity and static pressure, gas pipe and meter sizing, venting, combustion air, and the electrical supply are all separate calculations. Gas appliance work is regulated, and a size from this page does not stand in for the design or the sign-off.

What the existing radiators give at the temperature the system really runs

Radiator catalogue outputs are laboratory results taken at a standard temperature difference between the water and the room, declared under BS EN 442, and almost no system in service runs at that condition. Output falls steeply as the mean water temperature falls, and the relationship is not linear — a manufacturer's correction factor for the flow, return and room temperatures you actually have is the only defensible way to turn a catalogue figure into an output.

This matters twice on an extension. It matters when you size the new emitters, because sizing them at a flow temperature the plant does not deliver produces two cold rooms that everyone blames on the boiler. And it matters if the job is also the opportunity to drop the flow temperature — for a future heat pump, or simply to get a condensing boiler condensing. Drop it and every radiator already in the house loses output at the same moment, so the extension is no longer the only room that is short.

Put the trade to the client explicitly. Oversizing the two new radiators costs little on the day and buys the option of running the whole system cooler later; undersizing them locks the house into whatever flow temperature makes them work, and correcting that later means lifting a floor with a finish on it.

Whether fifteen millimetre feeds the run

The flow a leg has to carry follows directly from the heat it has to deliver and the temperature drop across the circuit: in metric terms, litres per second is kilowatts divided by the product of water's specific heat capacity, about 4.18 kilojoules per kilogram per kelvin, and the design temperature drop in kelvin. Nothing about that is negotiable, and it explains why the same radiator on the same pipe becomes a different pipe-sizing problem when somebody changes the design drop from twenty degrees to ten.

Convert that flow to a velocity and the pipe size argument settles itself. Half-hard copper to BS EN 1057 in 15 mm with the commonly stocked 0.7 mm wall has a 13.6 mm bore; 22 mm with a 0.9 mm wall has 20.2 mm. Divide the volumetric flow by the bore area and velocity is what decides whether a leg is quiet. Published pipe sizing data — CIBSE Guide C in the UK, the ASHRAE Handbook's pipe sizing chapter elsewhere — sets the ceilings, and they exist for two reasons: noise, which the client hears immediately, and erosion-corrosion of the tube wall, which nobody hears for years. In small domestic copper carrying hot water continuously, practice settles around a metre per second.

Two details catch people out on retrofit legs. The first is that a 15 mm leg teed off to feed two radiators carries the sum of both, and the tee is usually made where it is convenient to reach rather than where the load divides. The second is that 15 mm plastic barrier pipe is not 15 mm copper: its wall is thicker, so its bore is smaller before you start, and the insert that goes into the end of it restricts the bore further at every joint. Take that figure from the pipe manufacturer's data for the exact product; it varies between makers by enough to matter over a long run.

Then look at what the new leg tees off. An existing 22 mm main comfortable serving the original house is now carrying the extension's flow as well through the same bore, so the check belongs on the loaded section between the boiler and the tee, not on the new pipe alone. Where the existing distribution is 8 or 10 mm microbore from a manifold, a single new emitter on its own tail may be fine and a leg serving a whole extension will not be — microbore was sized for one radiator at a time and does not scale.

Flow implied by the heat a leg carries, and the velocity that flow makes in 15 mm copper with a 13.6 mm bore
Heat on the leg (kW)Flow at 20 K drop (l/s)Velocity in 15 mm (m/s)Flow at 10 K drop (l/s)Velocity in 15 mm (m/s)
10.0120.080.0240.16
20.0240.160.0480.33
30.0360.250.0720.49
40.0480.330.0960.66
60.0720.490.1440.99
80.0960.660.1911.32
120.1440.990.2871.98
Flow implied by the heat a leg carries, and the velocity that flow makes in 15 mm copper with a 13.6 mm bore

What the circulator has left

An extension adds resistance in series with everything the pump was already pushing against, usually at the far end. The circuit with the greatest total resistance sets the head the circulator has to produce, and once the extension is built that circuit is frequently the new one — a longer run in smaller pipe with a pair of emitters and their valves on the end. Whatever the pump was set to, it was set for a different circuit.

Estimate the new requirement rather than hoping. Total head is the friction loss rate for the pipe and flow you have chosen, from a pipe sizing chart or a Hazen-Williams calculation, scaled by the circuit's total equivalent length. On a domestic leg the fittings are not a rounding error: elbows to get round a steel, the branch tee, the isolating valve either side of each emitter and the emitter connections routinely add up to more equivalent length than the straight pipe they sit on. Count them off the route as built, not off the drawing.

Then find out what the pump actually is. A glandless circulator sold in Europe now meets the efficiency index set under Commission Regulation (EC) No 641/2009, which is why almost every replacement is a variable-speed unit with a display — and that display reports the duty it is producing, a free reading nobody takes. If the pump is a three-speed unit already strapped on speed three, there is no headroom left and the extension will take its flow out of the rooms at the end of the old circuit. Fitting a bigger pump to cover for a leg that is too small is the wrong repair: excess head goes preferentially into the circuits with least resistance, so the near rooms get louder and the far rooms stay cold.

Scale the friction loss rate for your chosen pipe and flow by the equivalent length of the circuit as built, fittings counted, and compare the answer with the curve of the circulator that is genuinely on the wall.

The friction head loss per 100 ft (or 100 m) of pipe run, from a pipe sizing chart or a Hazen-Williams friction loss calculation at the design flow rate.

The straight pipe length plus the equivalent length of all fittings, valves, and equipment in the circuit's index (longest/most-resistant) run.

Total pump head required

10 head units

Medium confidence

Friction loss rate must come from your system's actual pipe sizing chart or Hazen-Williams calculation for the design flow rate — this calculator only scales that rate by total equivalent length; it does not calculate the friction loss rate itself.

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Head on its own selects no circulator. A pump is chosen where the required head and the design flow meet on its curve, so this figure has to be carried forward with the same flow rate the friction loss rate was read at — two systems needing identical head at very different flows take entirely different pumps.
  • Plain water is assumed. A 30 to 50 percent propylene glycol charge is thicker and heavier, raising circuit friction at the same flow and cutting the flow any given pump delivers, so a snowmelt slab or a freeze-protected loop sized from a water friction rate ends up short of flow at the far end of the circuit.
  • In a closed loop the pump lifts nothing — the down-leg balances the up-leg — so building height belongs nowhere in this figure and adding it oversizes the pump. The reverse applies to an open circuit such as a drainback array or an open tank: there the vertical rise from the water surface to the discharge is real head, and it is not included here.

The litres the extension adds

A sealed system holds a specific quantity of water, and three decisions depend on knowing it: the expansion vessel, the inhibitor dose, and whether the vessel already fitted is now too small. Almost nobody writes the figure down, which is why it gets re-estimated by eye every time somebody needs it.

Build it up rather than guessing at it. Pipe content per metre is fixed by the bore, and the reason the figures in the table below look trivial is that the pipe is rarely where the water is. The water is in the emitters and the heat source. Radiator content comes from the manufacturer's data sheet for the exact panel type and height, and the spread is enormous: a pressed steel panel holds a fraction of what a cast iron column radiator of the same output holds. Add the boiler's own water content from its manual, and any cylinder coil or buffer in the loop.

Do it before the extension is connected and again after, because the difference is what the rest of the job turns on. If the system held 110 litres and the extension adds 25, that is a 23 percent increase, and both the vessel and the inhibitor dose were specified against the smaller figure. BS 7593 sets out the cleaning and dosing regime for a domestic system in the UK, and the dose is proportional to volume — a concentration that was correct last month is diluted by everything you just added.

Water held per metre of straight tube, by bore, for the sizes a domestic extension is likely to use
TubeBoreWater content per metre
8 mm microbore, BS EN 1057, 0.6 mm wall6.8 mm0.036 litres
10 mm microbore, BS EN 1057, 0.6 mm wall8.8 mm0.061 litres
15 mm copper, BS EN 1057, 0.7 mm wall13.6 mm0.145 litres
22 mm copper, BS EN 1057, 0.9 mm wall20.2 mm0.320 litres
28 mm copper, BS EN 1057, 0.9 mm wall26.2 mm0.539 litres
1/2 in copper, ASTM B88 Type L0.545 in0.151 litres (0.0121 US gal per foot)
3/4 in copper, ASTM B88 Type L0.785 in0.312 litres (0.0251 US gal per foot)
Water held per metre of straight tube, by bore, for the sizes a domestic extension is likely to use

Take the bore from the tube's own specification rather than its nominal name, and watch the unit on the diameter field: it is centimetres in metric, so the 13.6 mm bore above goes in as 1.36, not 13.6. Run each size on the job separately and keep the total — the vessel check and the inhibitor dose both read from it.

The pipe's inside diameter, not the nominal or outside size.

The total length of pipe run.

Estimated pipe volume needed

0.7573 gallons

High confidence
Volume (liters)
2.87 liters
Volume (in³)
174.95 in³

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

10 ft2 m33 ft10.06 m0.75 in1.91 cm

What this calculation does not cover

  • The figure is the contents of a straight bore and nothing else. Fittings, valve bodies, meters, strainers and any water standing in a cylinder or tank at the end of the run are not counted, and the pipe wall is excluded — so this is not the volume of pipe material, and not the space the pipe occupies in a chase or trench.
  • Volume scales with the square of the bore, so an inside diameter that is 9 per cent out produces a volume 19 per cent out. Published inside diameters differ by material, schedule and class for the same nominal size, and the calculator takes whatever figure you type at face value — it has no way of knowing that a half-inch pipe was entered at half an inch.
  • It assumes the run is completely full of liquid over its whole length. Gravity drains, waste stacks and sewers are designed to flow part full, and a system that has not been purged holds air at its high points, so both contain less than this number says.
  • It answers how much the run holds, not how long the wait is. Turning that volume into a hot-water delay needs the fixture's flow rate as well, and the real delay runs longer because the first hot water gives up heat to the pipe wall and to whatever surrounds it. No time calculation happens on this page.
  • Nothing here is a sizing or a support check. Velocity, friction loss and pressure drop are separate calculations, and a long run that holds a comfortable volume can still be too small to deliver flow. The contents also weigh whatever that volume of water weighs, which bears on hanger spacing and is not assessed.

The vessel on the heating side

Water expands as it heats and a sealed system has nowhere to put the extra except a vessel with a gas cushion behind a diaphragm. That vessel has to absorb the expansion without system pressure reaching the relief valve setting the appliance was supplied with — 3 bar on most domestic sealed systems. Add water to a system whose vessel was already marginal and the first cold snap lifts the relief valve, the system loses water through the discharge pipe, somebody tops it up, and the cycle repeats with a fresh charge of dissolved oxygen each time.

Sizing it needs three things: the system volume you have just totalled, the fraction by which that volume expands across the operating temperature range, and the fact that a diaphragm vessel cannot accept its full nominal volume as expansion water — only the part set by the gap between cold fill pressure and relief valve setting. BS EN 12828 covers the design of water-based heating systems and BS EN 13831 the vessels themselves; the acceptance figure for the specific vessel is in its manufacturer's data.

Cold fill pressure is not a free choice either. It has to keep the highest point positively pressurised when everything is cold — roughly a tenth of a bar per metre of height to the highest emitter, plus a working allowance. A single-storey extension is undemanding; a job that also converts a loft resets that number, and a system filled to its old pressure will draw air in at the new high point every time it cools.

Pre-charge should match the cold fill pressure, and it is checked with the system pressure taken off the vessel, not with a gauge reading a pressurised system. A vessel that has lost its charge reads perfectly normal on the boiler gauge when cold and is full of water — it is doing nothing at all. Where the existing one turns out to be too small for the enlarged volume, a second vessel piped in parallel on the return is a legitimate and much cheaper answer than replacing it, provided both carry the same pre-charge.

Feed it the system volume you totalled after the extension, not before, and treat the result as a preliminary check against the vessel already fitted rather than as a selection.

The total water volume held in the closed hydronic loop, including boiler/chiller, piping, and terminal units.

The fraction by which the system water expands in volume across its full operating temperature swing.

The fraction of the tank's total volume that is actually usable to accept expanded water, based on the tank's fill and relief pressures.

Minimum expansion tank total (nominal) volume

8.67 gal

Medium confidence

This is a simplified sizing approximation — final expansion tank sizing should follow the ASHRAE/hydronic system design method (or the tank manufacturer's sizing software) accounting for actual fill pressure, relief valve setting, and system operating temperature range.

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The expansion fractions offered here are water. A loop charged with 30 to 50 percent propylene or ethylene glycol expands appreciably more over the same temperature swing, and the fluid supplier publishes the figure for the concentration you are running. Size a glycol system on a water fraction and the relief valve opens at design temperature and dumps the glycol you paid for — the system then makes up with plain water and quietly loses its freeze protection.
  • A tank of the right volume does nothing if it is precharged wrong. The air side must be set to the system's fill pressure at the tank's own elevation, with the water side empty, before the loop is filled. A tank shipped at 12 psi (83 kPa) and hung on a system filled to 25 psi (172 kPa) has already spent most of its acceptance volume before the water is even warm, and the acceptance factor above has stopped describing it.
  • Where the tank ties into the loop is not a sizing question, but it decides whether the tank works. The connection point is the one place in the system whose pressure the pump cannot change — pipe the tank into the pump's suction side and the pump adds its head to the rest of the loop, put it on the discharge side and the pump subtracts it, which can drop the pressure at the top of the system or at the pump inlet far enough to draw air or cavitate on a tank that was sized correctly.

The other vessel, the one on the cylinder

If the boiler also serves a stored hot water cylinder, there is a second expansion vessel in the building doing an entirely different job, and confusing the two is a common and consequential error. The heating vessel absorbs the expansion of the sealed heating loop. The potable one absorbs the expansion of the stored domestic hot water, which has nowhere to go whenever a check valve, a pressure reducing valve or a backflow preventer has closed the system off from the main.

Everything about the sum is different. The volume is the cylinder's stored capacity, not the distribution; the expansion fraction is smaller because the temperature range is narrower; and the pre-charge matches the incoming mains pressure rather than the heating fill pressure. An engineer who checks both vessels against the boiler's fill pressure has just set the potable one wrong. Where the extension adds an en-suite and the cylinder is upsized to serve it, this vessel is resized too — under Approved Document G in England and Wales, and under the thermal expansion control provisions of the International Plumbing Code or the Uniform Plumbing Code in North America.

This is the cylinder's vessel, not the heating system's: the volume is the stored hot water, the expansion fraction is smaller, and the pre-charge follows the incoming main.

The rated storage capacity of your water heater, in the unit shown.

The percentage volume increase as water heats up.

Minimum expansion tank acceptance volume

1 gal

Medium confidence

This estimates the minimum acceptance volume only — actual expansion tank selection also depends on your system's static water pressure and the tank's precharge setting, which should match your incoming water pressure. Consult the tank manufacturer's sizing chart or a licensed plumber.

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The only water in the model is what the heater stores. Pipework, a recirculation loop and any downstream storage hold water that expands as well, so on a long distribution run or a recirculating system the true expansion volume is larger than the figure shown.
  • This is the volume of water the tank must accept, not the size of tank to buy. How much of a bladder tank's nominal capacity is usable acceptance depends on the gap between its precharge and the highest pressure the system is allowed to reach, so the tank you order is normally larger than this number — match it against the manufacturer's acceptance rating rather than its nameplate capacity.
  • No pressure is entered anywhere in this calculation. It cannot confirm that the tank precharge matches your static supply pressure, and it does not check that system pressure stays below the water heater's temperature and pressure relief setting — a correctly sized tank charged to the wrong pressure still lets pressure spike, and nothing here would show it.
  • The expansion percentage is a figure you type, not one derived from your incoming water temperature and heater setpoint. A colder cold-water supply, a higher setpoint, or a solar or heat pump cylinder swinging over a wider temperature range all expand more than the domestic default assumes.
  • It does not establish whether you need a tank or whether the installation complies. Nothing tests for the check valve, backflow preventer or pressure-reducing valve that makes a system closed, and the heater size field stops at about 380 L (100 US gallons), so commercial storage and boiler or hydronic loops fall outside it. Treat the result as an estimate to check against local code and a licensed plumber, not as a sign-off.

The leg that runs through cold space

The pipe from the existing system to the new radiators almost never takes a warm route. It goes under a suspended floor, through a roof void above an insulated ceiling, along the back of a garage, or round the outside of the old external wall. Every metre of that is heat leaving before it reaches the room it was meant for, and the boiler pays for it whether or not anybody counted it.

Insulate it, and take the thickness from the table that governs rather than off the box. Minimum thicknesses are published against pipe size, service temperature and insulation conductivity — for a house in North America that is the residential provisions of the International Energy Conservation Code, ASHRAE Standard 90.1 carrying the equivalent tables for the commercial buildings it covers; BS 5422 is the specifying method in the UK, and the Domestic Building Services Compliance Guide sets the domestic floor there. Those are minima, and on a run through genuinely unheated space more than the minimum pays back quickly.

Two details decide whether the lagging survives. Sleeve is consumed by bends, because each mitre comes out of a section, so a count taken off the straight run with no allowance for them will be short before the second radiator. And a leg crossing under a new slab or screed needs continuous pre-insulated pipe or a duct, with no joint under the finish — a compression fitting buried in a screed is a leak that gets found by breaking up a floor with a kitchen standing on it.

Give it the measured run through unheated space and nothing more: it already carries the allowance for what mitring at the bends consumes, so a length inflated by hand before it goes in has that allowance applied to it twice.

SettingsSettings for this calculation
Who is doing the work?

The standard allowance most suppliers and estimating guides assume for ordinary work.

The total length of pipe you want to insulate.

Sleeve lost to mitring at elbows and trimming to fit between clips.

Pipe insulation sections needed

9 x 6 ft sections

High confidence
Pipe length (with waste)
53.9 linear ft

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

49 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The count is driven by run length alone, so it does not tell you which sleeve to buy. Tubular insulation is sized both by the pipe's outside diameter and, separately, by wall thickness, and a sleeve one bore size out will either refuse to close around the pipe or sit loose with an air gap running the length of it.
  • Nothing here checks whether the insulation is thick enough for the duty. The minimum wall thickness for hot water pipes is set by energy code against pipe size and fluid temperature, and the thickness needed to hold a cold or chilled line above its dew point depends on ambient temperature and relative humidity; both are jurisdictional, and neither is a function of how long the run is.
  • The waste allowance covers mitring at bends and trimming to fit, not a fitting-by-fitting take-off. Elbows, tees, valves and flanges are normally covered with pre-formed fitting covers bought separately, and a compact run with many changes of direction can eat well past the 10% default in offcuts.
  • The answer counts whole stock sleeves, so the imperial and metric figures are not restatements of one another. A 15 m run comes out as 10 six-foot sleeves, which is 18.3 m of insulation, or as 17 one-metre sleeves, which is 17 m; the piece counts differ because the products differ, and metric merchants also stock 2 m lengths that this count does not assume.
  • Only the sleeves are counted. Self-seal tape or ties for the split seam and end caps are extra, and the figure assumes the run can be wrapped end to end: pipe clips, hangers and the points where a pipe passes through a wall interrupt the insulation, and those breaks are where heat loss and freezing concentrate.

Bringing the enlarged system back into commission

New pipework arrives with flux, swarf and jointing debris in it, and connecting it straight into an old system distributes all of that into the heat exchanger and the pump. Flush the new work before it joins the old, then treat the whole system as one: clean, flush, dose and record, following BS 7593 in the UK or the water treatment practice the appliance manufacturer names, because the warranty is usually conditional on it.

Then rebalance, because the hydraulic shape of the system has changed and every existing flow has moved with it. A new low-resistance branch takes flow from the circuits at the far end of the old distribution, and the room that goes cold once an extension is finished is very often a bedroom at the other end of the house that nobody connected to the building work. This is the step that stops the new radiators from being paid for by the old ones.

Finish with the record, or the next person starts from nothing: system volume, vessel size and pre-charge, cold fill pressure, pump mode and setting, the flow temperature the balance was set at, and the radiator schedule with each emitter's design output. Ten minutes, and it is the difference between a future fault being diagnosed and being guessed at.

  1. Isolate and drain only the section you need, noting the volume that comes out.
  2. Make the new pipework up complete and flush it clear before it joins the existing distribution.
  3. Connect, refill to the cold fill pressure the highest point requires, and vent upward from the lowest.
  4. Check the vessel pre-charge with system pressure removed from it, and correct it before going further.
  5. Bring the system to design flow temperature with every emitter calling, and watch the appliance modulate.
  6. Rebalance the whole system, not just the new branch, and record the valve settings.
  7. Clean, flush and dose to the standard the appliance manufacturer names, at the new system volume.
  8. Have work on the appliance, including the gas rate and combustion check, done and certificated by a registered person.

When the answer is not another radiator

Sometimes the four checks come back saying the system cannot be extended sensibly, and the professional answer is to say so early rather than fit the radiators and hope. The signs are consistent: a microbore distribution that cannot deliver the flow the new rooms need, a leg whose only viable route is too long to serve at an acceptable velocity in any pipe that fits through the joists, or an appliance already at its ceiling on a design day with the existing house alone.

The alternatives are usually cheaper than a new boiler and are rarely offered: a dedicated flow and return in a larger bore taken back to the plant with the extension run as its own zone, or a separate heat source where getting pipe back to the plant would mean lifting a finished floor across the whole house. What is not an alternative is raising the flow temperature until the undersized emitters work. That fixes the symptom, stops a condensing boiler condensing for the rest of its life, and charges the client every hour of every heating season for a decision made in an afternoon.

The figures to have in front of you before quoting the extension

None of this is a materials list — it is the set of numbers that decide whether the job is two radiators and a tee or a new main back to the plant, gathered before anyone commits to a price.

  • Surface-by-surface fabric loss for the new rooms — Wall, roof, floor and each glazing type run separately at the published design outdoor temperature for the location.
  • The revised loss for any room the extension opens into — An old external wall that has become internal changes the room behind it, and its existing radiator was sized for the old one.
  • The appliance's heating output and turndown, from its manual — Not the number in the model name, which on a combi is the hot water output; and note what hot water priority does to it.
  • The heat each leg has to carry, converted to a flow and a velocity — Kilowatts over specific heat times the design temperature drop, then divided by the bore area of the tube actually installed.
  • Equivalent length of the new circuit with every fitting counted — Elbows, the branch tee, isolating valves either side of each emitter and the emitter connections, off the route as built.
  • System water volume before and after — Pipe by bore, emitters from their data sheets, plus the boiler and any cylinder coil — the vessel check and the inhibitor dose both read from this.
  • Existing vessel size, pre-charge and cold fill pressure — Pre-charge measured with the system pressure taken off the vessel; a vessel full of water reads normal on the boiler gauge.
  • Length of new pipework running through unheated space — Sets the insulation take-off and is heat the boiler pays for that never reaches the extension.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • BS EN 12828, Heating systems in buildings — Design for water-based heating systems
  • BS EN 442, Radiators and convectors — technical specifications and requirements, and test conditions
  • BS EN 13831, Closed expansion vessels with built-in diaphragm for installation in water
  • BS EN 1057, Copper and copper alloys — Seamless, round copper tubes for water and gas in sanitary and heating applications
  • ASTM B88, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube
  • BS 7593, Code of practice for the preparation, commissioning and maintenance of domestic central heating systems
  • BS 5422, Method for specifying thermal insulating materials for pipes, tanks, vessels, ductwork and equipment
  • CIBSE Guide C, Reference Data (pipe sizing and water content tables)
  • CIBSE Domestic Heating Design Guide
  • ASHRAE Handbook, Fundamentals: climatic design data, and the pipe sizing chapter
  • ASHRAE Standard 90.1, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings (minimum pipe insulation thickness tables)
  • ACCA Manual J, Residential Load Calculation
  • Approved Document G, Sanitation, hot water safety and water efficiency (England and Wales)
  • Domestic Building Services Compliance Guide, supporting Approved Document L
  • International Plumbing Code and Uniform Plumbing Code, thermal expansion control provisions
  • International Energy Conservation Code, residential provisions for mechanical system piping insulation
  • Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations (United Kingdom)
  • Commission Regulation (EC) No 641/2009, ecodesign requirements for glandless standalone circulators
  • Manufacturer literature for the boiler, circulator, expansion vessel, emitters and pipe actually installed

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.