Mass timber

Building With CLT and Glulam

Mass timber erection is finish work: every CLT panel and glulam beam you set is the ceiling below it, so damage is permanent.
  • 12 minReading time
  • 11Sections
  • 4Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

The Panel You Set Is the Ceiling They See

A concrete frame gets forgiven twice: once by the screed, once by the plasterboard. A CLT soffit gets forgiven by nothing. The panel a crane sets at nine in the morning is the ceiling a client stands under two years later, raked by light from a rooflight at exactly the angle that finds every scuff. That single fact reorders the job. Your erection gang is doing finish carpentry while wearing gloves rated for steel edges, and nobody following them will cover their mistakes.

Everything downstream inherits it. A slung load that swings into a wall panel leaves a bruise that no filler matches, because crushed fibre takes stain at a different rate than sound fibre and the repair reads as a pale ghost forever. A boot print pressed into wet dust on a floor panel dries into a grey shadow. Chalk lines on the face, crayon marks for cuts, a dropped box of screws on the deck — ordinary framing habits, all of them, and all of them permanent on an exposed surface.

Cost lands somewhere unfamiliar too. Damaged mass timber is rarely structurally condemned; it is aesthetically condemned, and the fix is a replacement panel cut on the factory's lead time rather than the site's programme, with the floor above waiting on it.

Appearance Grade Is Decided Before the Truck Loads

Grade governs what you are allowed to be annoyed about later, and it is fixed before the truck loads. CLT declared to EN 16351 (Timber structures — Cross laminated timber — Requirements) or ANSI/APA PRG 320 (Standard for Performance-Rated Cross-Laminated Timber) carries an appearance classification for the outer lamellae, typically split between a visual-quality face and a non-visual or industrial face. Glulam declared to EN 14080 (Timber structures — Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber — Requirements) or manufactured to the North American structural glued laminated timber standards carries appearance classes running from framing through industrial and architectural to premium, defined in the appearance specification rather than the strength one.

Read what those classes actually permit. A visual grade is not a promise of clear timber; it permits knots within stated limits, face patches, filled voids, and colour variation between lamellae cut from different logs. If the architect's rendering shows uniform blonde spruce and the order says industrial face, the argument arrives on site, aimed at you, months after the specification settled it.

The trap that catches crews is orientation. Appearance grade usually applies to one face only, and panels are stacked for transport in whatever order suits the load, not the erection sequence. Every panel schedule needs the exposed face marked, every panel needs that mark readable while it is still in the stack, and the banksman needs to be reading it. Flipping a panel to make a lift easier exposes the industrial face of a soffit permanently.

Placing Joints Someone Will Stare At

Joint positions are a design decision that the setting-out drawing makes and the ceiling then advertises for the life of the building. Panel width is limited by road transport, so a floor gets divided whether anyone plans it or not; the only choice is whether the divisions land somewhere deliberate. Joints aligned with a glazing mullion, a lighting run or a partition line read as intent. Joints falling a hundred millimetres off those lines read as an error, and they read that way from every seat in the room.

Detail type changes the visual weight as much as position does. A half-lap shows a single line. A surface spline shows a strip of different material and often a double row of screws. A butt joint connected with structural screws from the topside shows almost nothing from below, which is why it earns its cost on exposed soffits even where a spline would do structurally. Settle this early, because it drives panel widths, and panel widths drive the whole grid.

Openings compound the problem. Stair voids, riser shafts and rooflights interrupt the layer direction, and a panel cut hard against an opening can leave a narrow remnant strip that is awkward to lift, awkward to fix and visually obvious. Working the grid so openings fall within panels rather than across joints usually costs less material than fighting it afterwards.

Panel widths, joint lines and layer direction are all still movable at this drawing stage and frozen the moment the deck goes up, so the grid is worth testing here rather than explaining later.

The total floor area to be covered with CLT panels.

The width of a single manufactured CLT panel.

The length of a single manufactured CLT panel.

CLT panels needed

9 panels

High confidence
Single panel area
390 sq ft

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

56.83 ft17.32 m56.83 ft17.32 mequivalent area3,230 sq ft300.08 m²20 ft5 m

What this calculation does not cover

  • CLT spans one way and this count is two-dimensional. The panel's strong direction runs its length, so panels have to land square across the supports with bearing at each end, and the real quantity comes from fitting whole panels to the bay grid rather than dividing a total area — where the span does not divide neatly into the panel length, the difference is scrap and the count goes up.
  • Panel size is limited on site as well as in the factory. A 3 x 12 m (39 ft) panel at a typical 175 mm (7 in) layup weighs on the order of 3 tonnes (3.3 tons), so crane capacity at the working radius, delivery access and the erection sequence often force smaller panels than the press could make — and smaller panels means more of them than this division shows.

Rigging for a Surface, Not Just a Load

Lifting is the stage where damage actually happens, and most of it is decided by gear choices made before the crane arrives. Screw-in lifting anchors are quick but leave holes; on any panel with an exposed soffit those anchors must land in the top face, which constrains rigging geometry and sometimes forces a spreader beam where a two-leg sling would have done. Round slings need softeners at every arris, and vacuum lifters need a clean, dry, planed face to seal against — the dust that ruins the seal is the same dust that grinds into the finish.

Landing and stacking do the quieter damage. Panels set down on concrete pick up grit, and grit under the next panel scratches the face beneath, so bearers go under every stack with the exposed face protected and covered. Site cutting, where it cannot be avoided, happens off the finished deck with the offcut supported, because a panel that breaks free at the end of a cut tears fibre on the underside. Erecting a plate in driving rain and leaving it open for a week is a decision about the finish, not only the programme.

Adding a spreader beam to keep anchors off the soffit also adds its own weight to the hook, so the pick wants rechecking against the chart once the rigging has been chosen for the surface.

Read from YOUR crane's chart, at this radius and configuration.

Mass of the item being lifted.

Slings, shackles, spreader beam, lifting frame.

The block reeved on the machine.

Allowance for wind and dynamic effects.

Chart utilisation

70.8 %

ComparisonA comparison, not a check — no result here is an approval.

Within capacity for the chart figure entered. This is arithmetic, not a lift plan.

Gross lifted load
12,485 lb
Rated capacity
17,635 lb
Margin remaining
5,150 lb
Load alone as a share of capacity
56.25 %
Rigging, block and allowance
2,565 lb
Gross load in tonnes
5.66 t

What this calculation does not cover

  • This is arithmetic on figures you supply, not a lift plan and not an engineering approval. A lift plan covers ground bearing, proximity hazards, exclusion zones, wind limits, the rigging arrangement and the sequence — none of which is here.
  • Rated capacity must come from the chart for the actual machine in the actual configuration. Radius, boom length, counterweight and outrigger extension each change it, sometimes dramatically.
  • Wind is not modelled. It acts on the load's surface area rather than its mass, and a large light panel can be a harder lift than a small heavy one. The manufacturer's wind limit is a stop, not a factor.
  • Ground bearing pressure under outriggers or tracks is a separate and frequently governing check.

Glulam Reads Against Every Straight Line Near It

Glulam in the open competes with every straight line near it. A beam sized for strength, and even for code deflection, can still read as sagging above a level window head, because the eye compares the two edges directly and detects a deviation far smaller than any limit in the standard. Where the beam runs above a long span of glazing, the perceived defect is the difference between two lines, and it grows with span.

Precamber answers this, and it has to be ordered rather than wished for — manufactured into the member, with the direction marked, since a cambered beam installed upside down is a defect on delivery day. Deflection limits themselves vary by jurisdiction: EN 1995-1-1 (Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures — General — Common rules and rules for buildings) works in instantaneous and final deflection with a creep factor tied to service class, while the National Design Specification for Wood Construction and CSA O86 (Engineering Design in Wood) set their own frameworks. The locally adopted code and the project specification govern.

Long-term behaviour matters more here than on a covered frame. Creep under sustained load continues for years, so a beam that looks acceptable at handover can look tired later, particularly in damper service conditions. Check final deflection rather than instantaneous, and treat a marginal result as a reason to go up a section.

Accepting a section or signing off a delivered camber is the last moment anyone can cheaply change the line an occupant will compare against the window head beside it.

The uniformly distributed load along the beam's length.

The beam's clear span between supports.

The glulam's modulus of elasticity, from the manufacturer's grade stamp or design values.

The beam cross-section's moment of inertia about the bending axis.

The applicable code deflection limit, as a fraction of the span.

Calculated deflection

0.582 in

ComparisonA comparison, not a check — no result here is an approval.

The deflection this beam works out to is below the L/360 limit for the span entered shown with it — you entered it from the deflection ratio you chose. Being under one limit is not a design. Nothing else is checked here — not the other limit states, not the connections, not the member the load arrives from.

Allowable limit
0.65 in

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 0.582 in — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

19.5 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The formula is the simply supported, uniformly loaded case only, Δ = 5wL⁴/(384EI). A cantilever of the same length and load deflects about nine and a half times as much, a beam continuous over a central support roughly two-fifths as much, and a central point load deflects a simple span about 1.6 times as much as the same total load spread evenly, so smearing a post or girder reaction into an equivalent uniform load understates the answer by around a third.
  • This is the instantaneous elastic deflection. Timber creeps under sustained load, and the codes deal with it by multiplying the permanent share of the deflection before it is compared with the total-load limit, typically by about 1.5 in (38 mm) dry service and 2.0 when the timber is wet or green, with the exact factor jurisdictional.
  • One deflection is compared against one denominator, but a floor is normally required to satisfy two separate checks: live load alone against the tighter limit and dead plus live against the looser one. Nothing on the page can tell which load has been typed in, so an L/360 pass on a total load is merely conservative while an L/240 pass on live load alone is not the floor check any code recognises. Meeting L/360 also says nothing about how a long-span floor feels underfoot, because perceived bounce is a vibration problem governed by frequency and mass rather than by this ratio.
  • Only bending deflection is calculated. Shear deformation is left out, and in timber it is not trivial because the shear modulus is roughly one-sixteenth of E: on a deep beam with a span-to-depth ratio below about 15 it can add ten per cent or more. Whether your input already allows for it depends on whether the supplier publishes a true modulus or an apparent one that carries a shear allowance.
  • The result is movement from the beam's unloaded shape, not sag below level. Glulam is routinely manufactured with camber, roof beams commonly to something like 1.5 times the dead-load deflection, so the installed beam finishes higher than this figure implies. On a shallow-pitch roof the same deflection is what starts ponding, where water collects in the sag and deepens it, and that feedback loop cannot be represented by a linear elastic formula.
  • The moment of inertia is taken as a single constant for the whole span, so a tapered or pitched glulam, a notched end, or a section drilled for services is stiffer on this page than it is on site.

Connections That Have to Look Deliberate

Connections on an exposed frame face two acceptance criteria, and the second one has no tolerance written down. Concealed connectors — slotted-in plates, proprietary concealed beam hangers, glued-in rods where the design permits them — cost more and demand better setting-out, but they leave the timber reading as timber. Surface-fixed angle brackets and top-flange hangers are faster and, on a visible face, become part of the architecture whether anyone intended that or not.

Fastener discipline decides how the rest looks. Self-tapping structural screws to EN 14592 (Timber structures — Dowel-type fasteners — Requirements), or the equivalent qualification in the local code, go in at specified angle, spacing and edge distance, and on a visible face they also go in straight: a line of forty screws that wanders is a defect the client will point at even after the engineer signs it off. Templates are worth their setup time, head finish is a decision to make at order stage rather than at the box, and overdriven heads crush fibre that holds dirt, darkens first, and cannot be sanded flush without cutting deeper into the face.

How many units a joint needs is decided by the load divided by the rated value for the connector you specified, and on an exposed frame that count is also how much hardware the room will be looking at.

The total design load the joint must transfer.

The rated capacity of a single connector, from the NDS Chapter 12 tables or manufacturer data.

Connector units needed

7 connector units

Medium confidence

This is a simple division of total load by your entered per-connector capacity — make sure that capacity comes from the actual NDS Chapter 12 table value (adjusted for species, thickness, and edge distance) or the manufacturer's rated data, not an assumed number.

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Group action is not applied. The NDS group action factor Cg falls as more connectors are added to a row, so the single-connector capacity you looked up is only valid for the number of connectors you assumed when you looked it up — which may not be the number this page returns. Re-check the tabulated value against the count and iterate until the two agree.
  • Direction of load relative to grain is ignored. Split-ring and shear-plate design values differ parallel and perpendicular to grain, and a load at an angle has to be interpolated between them. This calculation divides one number by another with no knowledge of your joint geometry, so a parallel-to-grain capacity applied to an angled or cross-grain load overstates the joint.
  • Nothing here checks that the connectors physically fit. End distance, edge distance, spacing along and across the row, the member thickness and width needed to seat a ring or plate, and whether the returned count fits on the contact face at all are all outside this calculation.
  • This is a connector count, not a connection design, and it does not replace one. The member itself is unchecked: net section at the connector groove, tension or compression capacity of the wood, row and group tear-out, and shear and bearing on the bolt through the ring or plate are separate calculations. A split ring cuts a groove that removes cross-section, so the member can govern before the connectors do.
  • Service and installation conditions are not applied. Wet service, elevated temperature, preservative or fire-retardant treatment, load reversal or cyclic loading, and whether the connector sits in one face or both all change the value you look up — none of them change the division done here, and none are checked.

Water Signs Its Own Work

Water is the only site hazard that signs its own work. End grain wicks fast, so panel ends, site cuts and unsealed CNC pockets absorb far more than a face will, and timber that has taken water at the end grain dries unevenly and checks. Floor panels are worse, because a fresh deck is a tray: rain collects at every upstand, sits, and drives moisture through the top lamella into a soffit somebody will look at.

Drainage belongs in the temporary works. Drilled drain holes at low points, sealed once the roof is on, are ordinary practice; so are factory edge sealers, taped joints, temporary membranes and, on longer programmes, a full weather-protection roof over the working level. Delivered moisture content is stated in the manufacturer's documentation — the site job is stopping it from rising, then letting it fall back slowly before the building closes.

Steel plus water plus tannin produces the stain everyone recognises. Black marks bloom around ferrous fixings, scaffold contact points and steel offcuts left lying on a wet deck, and they penetrate rather than sit on the surface. Brightening treatments sometimes lift them and sometimes only fade them. Non-ferrous or coated temporary fixings, plus a rule about what may rest on an exposed deck, prevents a class of damage that no repair fully undoes.

Concrete Tolerance Meets CNC Tolerance

Two tolerance regimes meet at the base of the first panel, and they were not written to agree. Concrete works to tolerances of the kind set out in ACI 117 (Specification for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials) or an equivalent national specification; CLT is a CNC product held to the dimensional tolerances of EN 16351 or ANSI/APA PRG 320, tighter by a large factor. Setting a precision panel on an imprecise slab without measuring first transfers every hollow and hump into the frame.

Survey the substrate and pack it. Level the bearing line with shims or a proprietary levelling system, check with a laser before the first wall panel goes down, and grout or dry-pack afterwards where the design calls for it. A base left a few millimetres out shows up four storeys later as a wall that will not close on its neighbour.

Movement continues after erection. Cross-lamination restrains in-plane shrinkage, but timber still moves substantially perpendicular to grain, and platform framing stacks that movement at every floor-to-wall junction, pulling at facade fixings, risers and door heads. Where the design allowed for it, the allowance has to survive contact with site — a hard-packed joint meant to compress becomes a split later.

Every Hole Belongs in the Machine File

Every hole in an exposed panel should exist in the CNC file before the panel is machined. Cutting a service penetration through a finished soffit produces a torn edge, unsealed end grain, and a permanent record of the coordination failure behind it. Sprinkler drops, socket positions, riser openings, downlights and duct crossings all have to be resolved by the model freeze, which lands far earlier in a mass timber programme than trades expect.

Route services where they can be reached instead: raised floors, a dropped bulkhead zone, chases in a non-exposed wall face, or a designed screed zone above the panel. Where a late penetration genuinely cannot be avoided, it goes through engineering review before a drill touches the panel, because a hole interrupts layers that were carrying load and the layer positions are invisible from the face. Follow-on trades need that explained at induction, in writing — a fixer who has spent a career shooting into plasterboard soffits will treat a CLT ceiling as a nailing surface otherwise.

Char Depth Is Finish Depth

Fire design on exposed timber consumes material from the surface you are trying to protect. Where the design relies on charring — the notional charring approach of EN 1995-1-2 (Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures — Structural fire design), or the equivalent provisions of the National Design Specification — a defined sacrificial thickness is doing structural work in a fire and is not spare material. Sanding a stain out of a soffit removes some of it.

How much timber may be exposed at all varies by jurisdiction. In the US the International Building Code's mass timber construction types set exposure and encapsulation requirements, and the locally adopted edition governs; elsewhere the national fire code and the approved design strategy decide. Encapsulated areas can look identical to exposed ones on a drawing while carrying a lining requirement that no follow-on trade may defeat.

Remedial sanding beyond a light finishing pass therefore belongs on the engineer's desk: the question is whether the residual section still satisfies the fire case that got the building consented.

Protection, Records and What Counts as Repair

Protection is a programme item with a cost, and building it into the erection sequence beats bolting it on after the first complaint. Floor panels take a sacrificial covering as soon as they are landed and screwed — breathable protection over traffic routes at minimum, full coverage under wet trades. Scaffold standards and hop-ups get softened where they bear on exposed timber, and wall arrises take corner protection until handover. None of it survives without someone whose job includes replacing it after each trade moves through.

Record what arrives and what happens to it. A photograph of each panel on landing, a damage register keyed to panel numbers, and an agreed threshold for acceptable variation turn a subjective argument at handover into a documented one. Manufacturers publish repair allowances for their products — plugged holes, sanded patches, colour-matched fills — and the permitted extent is a contractual matter to settle before the first repair.

Final finishing usually belongs to a specialist pass once the wet trades are done, and its timing is the last thing left to protect: sand too early and the deck picks up dirt again, sand too late and the drying stains have set.

Before the first pick

A short list that assumes the soffit is a finished surface from the moment it leaves the stack.

  • Panel schedule with the exposed face marked — Appearance grade applies to one face; stack order will not tell the banksman which.
  • Softened slings, spreader beam, top-face lifting anchors — Anchor holes in a soffit never go away, so rigging geometry has to keep them topside.
  • Bearers and covers for every stack and landed deck — Grit between panels scratches the face underneath before anyone has walked on it.
  • Temporary drainage on open floor plates — Drilled low-point holes, sealed once the roof is on, stop a fresh deck acting as a tray.
  • Non-ferrous or coated temporary fixings — Steel, water and tannin leave a black stain that penetrates rather than sitting on the surface.
  • Damage register keyed to panel numbers — A photo on landing turns the handover conversation from an argument into a record.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • EN 16351 — Timber structures — Cross laminated timber — Requirements
  • EN 14080 — Timber structures — Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber — Requirements
  • ANSI/APA PRG 320 — Standard for Performance-Rated Cross-Laminated Timber
  • EN 1995-1-1 (Eurocode 5) — Design of timber structures — General — Common rules and rules for buildings
  • EN 1995-1-2 (Eurocode 5) — Design of timber structures — Structural fire design
  • EN 14592 — Timber structures — Dowel-type fasteners — Requirements
  • National Design Specification (NDS) for Wood Construction
  • CSA O86 — Engineering Design in Wood
  • ACI 117 — Specification for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials
  • International Building Code — mass timber construction types (locally adopted edition governs)

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.