Site setup

Getting Plant and Deliveries Onto Soft Ground

Ramp geometry off the deck, fabric and stone across the wet, and the stabiliser leg that goes through while a delivery is being taken.
  • 19 minReading time
  • 11Sections
  • 5Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

Twenty tonnes on the verge at half past seven

The low-loader is parked half on the carriageway with its beacons going, the driver wants forty minutes of your life and not one minute more, and the field gate is nine metres away across a verge that has had rain on it since Thursday. The machine on the deck is the easy part. It will walk anywhere it is asked to walk once, provided it gets down the ramps without grounding. What it cannot do is walk somewhere four hundred times, and neither can the eight-wheeler bringing the stone that is supposed to make the walking possible.

Nearly every soft-ground move that goes wrong went wrong at the survey, and the survey was somebody standing at a gate looking at a field. Grass looks identical over a metre of firm glacial till and over four hundred millimetres of soft alluvium lying on top of it. Both take a boot print. Only one takes a wheel.

Three separate pieces of ground carry the day and they fail in three different ways: the piece the trailer stands on with its ramps down, the strip the machine crosses to reach the work, and the point where every delivery for the next six months stops, turns and is unloaded. Do the arithmetic in that order, because it is the order they get used in, and each is capable of wrecking the next.

The number on the spec sheet is a machine standing still

A tracked machine's ground pressure is its operating weight divided by the contact area of both tracks — track-on-ground length times shoe width, doubled. That is the figure in the brochure, and it is honest arithmetic about a machine sitting level on a flat pad with the boom tucked in, which is a condition that lasts roughly as long as it takes the operator to swing. Nothing you are about to ask the machine to do resembles it.

Slew the boom over the side with a full bucket at reach and the load leaves the middle of the track and piles up at one end of one of them. Trafficability work handles that by factoring the nominal figure rather than pretending the distribution stays uniform; the site version is simpler, which is that machines go down at the corner of a track, and they go down while turning. A tracked machine steers by skidding one track against the ground, and skidding is exactly what tears the crust that was holding it up.

Wheeled plant is a different animal and usually the worse one. Contact pressure under a pneumatic tyre is, to a first approximation, close to its inflation pressure, so a site dumper at road pressures presses harder on a wet field than a large excavator does — and unlike the excavator it cannot shed much of that without coming off the rim. It is why the first thing to get stuck is so often the smallest thing on site, and why a machine that walked in on Monday is no evidence about the wagon booked for Tuesday.

Four positions in a soft-ground move, and what each is actually being asked to survive
PositionWhat is on itHow it lets go
Trailer with ramps downA loaded deck, plus weight transferring forward down the ramps as the machine walks offThe nearside wheels settle into a soft verge, the deck twists, and the ramps move while the machine is on them
The single crossingOne tracked machine, once, then nothing else until demobilisationThe crust survives a straight pass and breaks under the skid turn at the end of it
The haul trackEvery wagon on the job, every day, on the same two wheel linesRuts, then water standing in the ruts, then fines pumped up into the stone until the stone stops working
The unloading bayA rigid sitting on four stabiliser feet with a load swinging out to full reachOne leg punches through and takes the vehicle's stability with it before anyone hears anything
Four positions in a soft-ground move, and what each is actually being asked to survive

Coming off the deck is geometry before it is driving

Ramp length falls out of two measurements and one decision. The rise is the deck height where the ramps actually land, taken on the loaded trailer standing where it will stand — not the empty figure from the haulier's brochure, and not before the driver dumps the suspension if that is part of his routine. The decision is the steepest grade you will run this machine on this surface, which is not a number to be carried over from the last job.

Fifteen per cent is a workable ceiling for wheeled equipment climbing under its own power; anything with low clearance, a long fixed overhang or a load on it wants ten or less, and hydraulic beavertail ramps run steeper than either because a tracked machine will climb what would defeat a wheel. A deck 1.05 m above the landing point held to fifteen per cent needs about seven metres of ramp, and ten and a half at ten per cent. The accessibility figures do not belong here at all: the 1:12 ceiling in the ADA and the equivalent limit in Approved Document M describe a person in a wheelchair, not a twenty-tonne excavator.

Grade is rarely what stops the machine anyway. What stops it is one of three angles — the approach where the track first meets the ramp, the breakover at the crest where the ramp meets the deck, and the departure where a counterweight or rear overhang swings down onto the ground. A ramp long enough to give a comfortable average grade still forms a sharp break at each end, and it is at those breaks that a counterweight touches, a belly plate grounds, or the machine pivots and drops the last half metre onto the deck.

The ramp foot is what everyone forgets. Set it on soft ground and it sinks as weight comes onto it, steepening the ramp while the machine is halfway up — the one moment you least want the geometry moving. A steel plate, a short mat or a bed of stone under each foot fixes that for ten minutes' work. So does turning the machine round: reversing a tracked excavator up with the boom out over the low end keeps the centre of gravity where you want it.

The road journey either side is governed, and worth checking rather than assuming: in Britain the vehicle and its load sit under the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, an abnormal indivisible load moves under the Road Vehicles (Authorisation of Special Types) (General) Order 2003, restraint is covered by the DVSA's load securing guidance, and the securing forces are calculated to EN 12195-1. The site-side duties for the machine itself sit in OSHA 29 CFR 1926.602, Material handling equipment.

  1. Agree where the trailer will stand before it arrives, and check the road position leaves the ramps landing on something rather than in a ditch.
  2. Measure deck height at the landing point with the machine on and the suspension where it will be, not from a specification sheet.
  3. Make up the ground under both ramp feet with plate, mat or stone so the geometry cannot change under load.
  4. Set the exclusion zone at the foot of the ramps and put the banksman where the operator can see him without turning his head.
  5. Release the chains and transport locks in the handbook's order, then walk the machine off squarely with somebody watching the counterweight rather than the tracks.

Enter the deck height you measured rather than the one you were quoted, and run it twice — once at the grade you would like and once at the grade the machine's clearance actually allows — because the difference between those two answers is the length of ramp that has to be on the wagon.

The vertical height the ramp needs to climb — e.g. trailer bed height off the ground.

The steepest slope you want the ramp to have.

Minimum ramp length

10.1 ft (minimum length)

Medium confidence

This is a straight-line ramp length based on grade alone — also check your specific equipment's ground clearance and approach/departure angle limits, which can require an even longer or hinged ramp regardless of grade.

Horizontal run needed on the ground
10 ft
Rise being climbed
1.5 ft
1.5 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The headline is the sloping face measured end to end — the plank you buy — while the horizontal run beside it is the ground the ramp reaches back across. They are different questions and the run is always the smaller of the two, so read the length when you are cutting material and the run when you are checking whether the space behind the trailer is deep enough.
  • Only rise and grade are asked for, so nothing here tests the ramp itself: load weight, plank material, span between supports and rated capacity play no part, and a ramp long enough to hit your grade target can still be badly under-rated for whatever is about to drive up it.
  • The length spans the rise and nothing else, so the overlap that hooks over the tailgate or bed lip and the flat footprint the bottom end needs to bear on is extra, added after this number rather than inside it.
  • A single constant slope is applied across the whole run, so an arched ramp, steeper at its ends than its average, can satisfy the maximum you entered on paper while exceeding it exactly where the wheels start to climb.
  • Rise Height is treated as one fixed measurement taken before loading, and it does not follow the bed settling as weight transfers onto it, a hitched or unhitched tow vehicle changing that height, or a ramp foot standing on ground that falls away from the trailer.
  • The grade field accepts 5% to 30% only and the rise stops at 3 m (about 10 ft), so gentler ramps for very low-clearance machines and dock-height rises above that cap fall outside what the tool will take.

What a temporary track is made of

A haul track across soft ground is four purchases: fabric, stone, the top-up stone nobody budgets for, and the plant time to lay it — and the fabric decides whether the other three were worth spending. Under repeated wheel loads a soft subgrade behaves as a pump. Each pass squeezes pore water out under the wheel line and drags subgrade fines up into the voids between the stones, and none of it shows from the surface until the day the track is suddenly a rut, by which point the stone has become a dirty gravel with no interlock left in it.

Fabric holds that boundary, and on a track it does a second job as well: once a rut has begun to form, the sheet is in tension across it and returns a little of the wheel load sideways instead of letting it all go downwards. Which fabric is not a preference. AASHTO M 288, Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications, classes separation geotextiles by survivability and states the properties each class must meet against named test methods — grab tensile to ASTM D4632, trapezoid tear to ASTM D4533, static puncture to ASTM D6241 — alongside an apparent opening size to ASTM D4751 and a permittivity to ASTM D4491 so the sheet filters the subgrade without damming the water it is trying to release. On a track built by tipping angular stone straight onto the sheet from a wagon, it is survivability that gets tested first and hardest, long before anybody finds out whether the filtration was right.

That specification also sets how much fabric you buy, because it fixes the overlap: M 288 widens the required lap as the subgrade weakens, and below a stated strength stops accepting an overlap at all and calls for sewn seams. The lap is no rounding error on the order — it comes off the usable width of every roll, so a wide lap on soft ground can add a whole extra pass down the track. Shingle the sheets so a wheel crossing a joint runs onto the top sheet rather than under its leading edge, roll fabric out ahead of the stone rather than across the site, and keep every wheel off the bare sheet: one turning tyre will take it apart.

How a temporary haul track is built up

A temporary haul track shown in section across its width, five courses from the ground upward: the proof-rolled subgrade, a separation geotextile lapped along the run, a stabilisation grid, the compacted stone that carries the wheel loads, and a thin sacrificial running course that is bladed and topped up as it wears.
  1. Sacrificial running course — the thin top that wears, gets bladed back flat and is replaced two or three times over a wet programme — a maintenance allowance, not a design layer Gravel Cubic Yards to Tons Calculator
  2. Compacted stone track — ordered by the tonne against a compacted thickness somebody designed, and laid wider than the wheel lines so the outer tyre never runs on the shoulder Roadway Base Course Aggregate Tonnage Calculator
  3. Stabilisation grid — where the design calls for one, its apertures confine the bottom of the stone so the layer spreads load instead of spreading sideways
  4. Separation geotextile — bought in whole rolls with the lap already taken off the usable width, and shingled so a wheel runs onto the upper sheet rather than under it Driveway Separation Geotextile Roll Calculator
  5. Proof-rolled subgrade — tested for strength before it is covered, and tested in the wettest state the track will ever see rather than on the dry morning of the survey Standard/Modified Proctor Compaction Percentage Calculator

It is written around a drive, and a haul track is the same shape of problem — a long run of a fixed width plus the turning head and the passing places as separate areas. Enter the lap your specification gives rather than the one the last job used, because that figure is what decides whether the track takes two passes of fabric or three.

From the road edge to the far end of the surfaced drive.

The full width the fabric has to reach across, shoulders included.

Any surfaced area off the main run, measured rather than estimated.

The manufactured width of the roll you can actually get delivered.

How much fabric is on one roll as supplied.

How far each sheet has to overlap the next one, side and end.

Geotextile rolls required

3 rolls

High confidence
Fabric area, laps included
10,651.14 ft²
Effective coverage width per pass
11 ft
Parallel passes across the drive
2 passes
Fabric run to be laid
852.09 ft

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

395 ft14 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Anchor trenches at the apron and at the far end are extra, and so is fabric turned up a shoulder or wrapped around an edge drain.
  • Sewn seams, where the specification calls for them on very soft ground, consume a seam allowance rather than an overlap and are not costed here.

The stone, and the wagon that has to bring it

There is a circularity at the start of every one of these jobs: the first load of stone has to arrive on the ground the stone exists to protect. The answer is always the same and always resisted, because it is slower. Build out from the hard end — tip on the last built metre, push the material forward with a machine that is itself standing on stone, and never let a loaded wagon put a wheel on raw subgrade. One bogged eight-wheeler costs more of the day than the whole morning's sequencing, and it leaves a hole exactly where the track was going.

Thickness is designed, not chosen. In Britain the document a piling or crane contractor asks for by name is BRE report BR 470, Working platforms for tracked plant, together with the working platform certificate that goes with it — somebody's signature accepting the platform as temporary works, which a verbal assurance at the gate is not. Where the design uses a geogrid, the Giroud–Han method for reinforced unpaved roads is the usual reference. Both start from a strength that has been measured: a CBR from a dynamic cone penetrometer to ASTM D6951, or a shear strength from a hand vane, taken at the wettest condition the track will see. A description of the soil is not an input to either, and neither is a thickness that worked on a different field.

Once a thickness exists the ordering is straightforward and the traps are in the units. Nine hundred square metres at 350 mm compacted, with the quarry's density for the material, comes out around 660 tonnes — thirty-three twenty-tonne wagon loads, a delivery programme rather than an order line, and at 3.5 m wide it is only about 257 m of track. Add the difference between loose delivered volume and compacted in-place volume, then add the stone that disappears into a very soft subgrade on the first pass, which on bad ground is a real tonnage rather than an allowance. Verify what you built against a Proctor density to ASTM D698 or ASTM D1557, by nuclear gauge to ASTM D6938 or by proof rolling with a loaded wagon — on a temporary track the proof roll is often the more honest of the two, because it applies the load the track was built for.

Buy stone for the width the wagons need, not the width they occupy. A track built to the exact width of a tipper leaves the driver no margin, so the outer wheels ride the shoulder — the part with no confinement on one side and the least compaction. It ravels, the edge drops away, and the usable width narrows every week until two vehicles cannot pass where the plan said they could.

Run it on the compacted thickness from the platform design and the area measured on the ground after setting out, with the density the quarry gives for the material actually being supplied — then treat the answer as the compacted requirement and add the loose-to-compacted difference and the sacrificial first pass separately.

The total roadway surface area to be covered with base course.

The compacted thickness of the base course layer.

The compacted in-place density of the base course aggregate.

Base course aggregate needed

335.9 tons

High confidence
Volume
199.26 yd³

Estimated cost — your price

This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.

base course 6 inbase course 152.4 mmsubgrade

What this calculation does not cover

  • Covers the neat prism only, area times depth. A base course is normally laid wider than the surfacing it carries, running past the edge of asphalt and then falling away on a batter, and that widening is real tonnage — take the area off the paved width alone and the order is short by the shoulder on every load.
  • The density asked for is the compacted in-place figure; the ticket at the weighbridge is wet weight. Aggregate leaves the pit carrying free moisture, a few percent by mass in normal weather and appreciably more after rain, so the mass bought and the mass placed are two different numbers and the difference is water you paid for.
  • Nothing here allows for stone lost into the subgrade. A soft or pumping formation swallows part of the first lift as the roller works it, and the material that disappears below the design line still came off a truck — on weak ground the order needs an over-excavation allowance, or a separation geotextile to stop the loss.

When mats beat stone

Stone is not always the answer, and the alternative is not a compromise. Hardwood bog mats, composite panels and interlocking aluminium trackway put a stiff spreading surface straight onto the ground with no excavation, no arisings and no stone layer to reinstate. They earn their place in three situations: over shallow buried services where you cannot dig, over ground you have to hand back as you found it — a tenanted field, a school playing field, an adopted verge — and on access used for a fortnight and then gone. The ground beneath still has to take the pressure; what changes is how widely the load is spread and how much you disturb to spread it.

The comparison people get wrong is between a purchase and a hire. Stone reads as cheaper because the tonnage has a price and the mats have a weekly rate, but at the end the stone has to be dug out, carted away and paid for at a gate, the ground under it reinstated, and stone that has spent a wet winter mixed into clay is not stone any more — it is a waste stream with a duty of care attached. Set the whole-life figure against eight or twelve weeks of trackway hire, and remember mats are laid and lifted by a machine that itself has to be standing on something.

The leg that goes through

Most deliveries to a soft site are unloaded by the vehicle's own crane, and the lorry loader is where the ground problem turns from slow into sudden. Wheels spread weight along a track; stabiliser legs concentrate the vehicle and its load onto four small feet, and the reaction on the offside leg with a load out at full reach bears no relation to kerb weight divided by four. That reaction comes from the loader manufacturer's own outrigger load data for the configuration in use — it is not a figure to estimate at the gate — and in Britain the operation sits under BS 7121, Code of practice for safe use of cranes, in the part covering lorry loaders.

The arithmetic afterwards is only a division, and it is brutal. A leg carrying twelve tonnes on a 500 mm square pad is 0.25 m² of contact and about 470 kPa on the ground. Put the same leg on a 1.2 m square mat and the contact area is 1.44 m², which is about 82 kPa — the same load, a shade under a sixth of the pressure, because area goes as the square of the side. Doubling the dimensions of a pad quarters what the ground feels, which is why arguing about pad size is one of the few conversations on a soft site where a small decision produces a large change.

Two cautions on the spreading. A mat only spreads if it is stiff enough to spread: a thin sheet under a concentrated point load dishes and delivers most of the pressure straight down under the foot, so the mat's own capacity matters as much as its footprint. And the figure you compare against is the allowable bearing pressure of whatever is under the leg at that spot, which is not automatically the ground the wheels are on — a track designed against repeated wheel loads was not designed against a static point load pushed into it in one place. That is the argument for building the unloading bay wider and thicker than the track, and for marking where the legs go rather than letting each driver find out.

Enter the leg reaction from the loader's own outrigger data — as a mass, because the box wants tonnes or kilogrammes, so a chart quoting the leg in kilonewtons needs dividing by 9.81 first — and give it the footprint of the mat rather than the foot. Compare the result against an allowable bearing pressure somebody measured on this site: the page checks the ground, and it deliberately does not check the crane.

The maximum reaction load this outrigger or crawler track transmits to the ground, from your crane's certified load chart.

The width of the cribbing mat or outrigger pad footprint in contact with the ground.

The length of the cribbing mat or outrigger pad footprint in contact with the ground.

The site soil's allowable bearing capacity, from geotechnical data or a competent person's assessment.

Applied ground bearing pressure

2,070 psf

ComparisonA comparison, not a check — no result here is an approval.

The pressure under this mat is at or below the allowable bearing capacity shown with it, which you entered. This checks GROUND bearing pressure only, from a reaction load you supply off your crane's own manufacturer-certified load chart and rigging plan — it calculates no crane capacity, stability, ballast or outrigger reaction, all of which come from the manufacturer's certified data and a qualified rigger or operator per OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart CC, and the allowable figure comes from your own geotechnical data or a competent person's site assessment. Sitting under the figure you entered is not clearance to lift. The chart, the ground, the rigging and the plan are all outside this arithmetic.

Outrigger reaction force
33,081.3 lbf
Mat contact area
16 ft²
Allowable bearing capacity (user-supplied)
3,132.82 psf

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 2,070 psf — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

4 ft4 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The load is spread evenly over the whole mat footprint you enter. Nothing checks whether the mat is stiff enough to do that — a small outrigger float on a flexible timber crib concentrates pressure under the float over a fraction of the mat — and the mat's own bending and shear capacity is never checked, so the mat can fail before the ground does.
  • The comparison is against one surface bearing number. It does not look at what is under the mat: a stiff crust over soft ground, punching through into a weaker layer, settlement, or capacity lost to rain, saturation, thaw or a nearby trench, excavation, slope or basement wall.
  • Buried services, culverts, vaults, backfilled trenches, and setting up on a suspended slab, podium deck or basement roof are not modelled. Where any of those sit under the mat the governing limit is the structure's capacity, not the soil's, and this calculation will not see it.
  • Only a static, centred, vertical reaction is modelled. Slewing, boom swing, out-of-level setup, wind and side loading shift the reaction onto one corner and load the mat eccentrically, driving peak edge pressure well above the average this reports.
  • This is a screening comparison with no factor of safety applied, not a crane setup design. It does not calculate crane capacity, stability, ballast or the outrigger reaction itself, and it does not replace a competent person's assessment of the actual pad.

Where a wagon turns round

Reversing a loaded eight-wheeler four hundred metres down a single-track haul road in the wet is how people get hurt, and it is the default arrangement wherever nobody drew a turning head. HSE guidance HSG144, The safe use of vehicles on construction sites, and the site traffic duties in Part 4 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 push the same way: separate vehicles from people, and design the reversing out rather than manage it with a banksman. In stone that means a one-way loop or a properly sized turning head — the item most often missing from a haul track take-off, because it is the only part that is not a length times a width.

A turning vehicle occupies two different outlines and they fail against two different things. The rear wheels track inside the front ones, so on a made track the inside of every bend is precisely where a tyre leaves the stone and finds the subgrade; the front corner of the body swings outside everything, which is what takes mirrors off gateposts and finds the low branch nobody looked at. Widen the bends on the inside, and check the body envelope against the physical obstructions rather than against the kerb line.

Take the dimensions from the vehicle you are actually receiving. A rigid eight-wheel tipper, an artic with a walking floor and a low-loader with a machine on it are three different templates, and the difference between them is the difference between a turning head that works and one that gets driven over. Where the delivery comes through a farm gate, measure the gate before the wagon is booked.

Drive it with the wheelbase, lock angle and overhangs of the wagon that is actually booked — the two outlines it returns are the band of ground that has to be built, and the inner one is where the stone has to reach.

Front axle centre to rear axle centre on the design vehicle.

How far the front wheels can be turned at full lock.

From the front axle centre forward to the foremost point of the body.

Overall width across the body, mirrors excluded.

Added outside the body envelope for driver variation and kerb faces.

Swept path width

17.2 ft

Medium confidence

A single-unit bicycle-model turn at steady full lock. It does not model a combination vehicle's trailer off-tracking, a transition into or out of the curve, or superelevation, and it is a check on a published template rather than a replacement for one.

Inside rear tyre path radius
28.26 ft
Outer body envelope radius
45.48 ft
Turn radius at the rear axle centre
32.26 ft
8 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Swept path has height as well as width. A container being tipped, a raised tailgate or an aerial device needs vertical clearance this page says nothing about.
  • Trailer off-tracking on a combination vehicle is additional and can be well beyond the tractor's own inside path.

What is over the track, and what is under it

Two hazards sit outside the ground problem and both get missed because the survey was looking down. Overhead lines are the first: a machine tracking across a field with a boom up, or — far more often — a tipper raising its body to discharge, is the classic contact, and the wagon tips wherever the driver decides to stop rather than where the plan intended. HSE guidance note GS6, Avoiding danger from overhead power lines, sets out the barriers, goalposts and exclusion arrangements, and the point of them is that they work on a driver who has never been to this site and will be here for eleven minutes. The second is what runs underneath. A stone track concentrates wheel loads onto anything shallow beneath it, and in agricultural land the thing beneath it is very often a field drain that no plan records: cut it or crush it and the field floods, the flooding is yours, and the ground you were trying to keep dry is the ground you have just watered.

The morning itself

Write the abort criteria down before the day rather than deciding them in front of a haulier who is already late. Standing water in the wheel lines, a proof roll that pumped, a wind figure that puts the loader outside its chart, a ramp landing that cannot be made up — any of those turns the wagon round, and turning a low-loader round costs a day. Recovering a bogged thirty-tonne machine costs several days, a second machine, an insurance conversation and the ground you were standing on.

The other habit worth keeping is the walk. Somebody walks the whole route before the first delivery each morning through a wet spell, on foot, looking at the wheel lines and at the shoulders rather than down the middle. A rut that has started to hold water is a top-up and a blade; the same rut a fortnight later is a dig-out and a rebuild with the job standing on it. The track tells you what it is about to do for about a week before it does it, and the only cost of listening is a pair of wet boots.

  1. Make the weather call the afternoon before, and tell the haulier then rather than at seven the next morning.
  2. Walk the route at first light and look at the wheel lines and shoulders, not the centre.
  3. Proof roll anything new with a loaded vehicle and a spotter before it carries a delivery.
  4. Confirm the ramp landing and the unloading bay are made up, and that the leg positions are marked.
  5. Brief the drivers on the route, the turning head and the one-way arrangement before they are through the gate.
  6. Book the top-up stone while the machine that will spread it is still on site.

Mud on the road, and the day it all comes up again

Everything that goes onto a soft site comes back off it stuck to a tyre. In England and Wales depositing mud on the public highway is an offence under the Highways Act 1980 and the highway authority will enforce it, usually after a neighbour's phone call rather than an inspection. The practical answers are unglamorous: a decent length of clean angular stone inside the gate so wheels are running on it before they reach the road, a wheel wash where the traffic justifies one, a sweeper on call rather than on a schedule, and somebody whose job it is to look at the road each afternoon.

Demobilisation is where the fabric pays for itself a second time. Stone lifted off a geotextile comes up as stone and can be screened, reused or sold; stone lifted off bare clay comes up with its bottom hundred millimetres as clay, which makes the whole heap a waste stream to be classified, carried and paid for at a gate. The sheet also tells the machine driver where to stop digging, which matters when the alternative is a bucket taking subsoil out of a field somebody farms.

What you owe the ground afterwards is written in the access agreement rather than in a standard, and on agricultural land it is usually more than levelling. Stripped topsoil goes back in the order it came off, and the compaction under a haul track reaches well below the stone — relieving it means subsoiling, not raking. Agree that scope with the occupier at the same time as the access, while you still have the machine that will do it, and photograph the ground before the first wagon arrives. The photographs cost nothing on the day and settle the argument six months later, which is the only time that argument is ever had.

Six numbers to have before the low-loader is booked

Each of these is cheap to establish the week before and expensive to establish on the verge with a driver waiting, and every one of them changes something you have to buy.

  • Deck height at the point the ramps land — Measured on the loaded trailer in the position it will stand, with the suspension where it will be. It sets the ramp length, and the brochure figure is not it.
  • The machine's weight and its contact area — Operating weight with the attachment fitted, track-on-ground length and shoe width — or tyre size and pressure for wheeled plant, which usually presses harder.
  • A measured subgrade strength, taken wet — A CBR from a dynamic cone penetrometer or a shear vane reading, at the worst condition the track will see. It is the input every platform thickness method needs and the one most often replaced by an opinion.
  • Track length, running width and the turning head — Walked on the ground rather than scaled, with passing places and the turning head measured as separate areas, because they are what the length-times-width figure leaves out.
  • The lap the geotextile specification requires — It widens as the subgrade weakens and it comes off the usable width of every roll, so it decides the number of passes before it decides anything else.
  • Stabiliser leg reaction from the loader's own data — For the configuration and reach actually being used, not a share of the vehicle weight — then chosen against a mat footprint rather than the leg's foot.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • BRE report BR 470, Working platforms for tracked plant
  • AASHTO M 288, Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications
  • ASTM D4632, Standard Test Method for Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles
  • ASTM D4533, Standard Test Method for Trapezoid Tearing Strength of Geotextiles
  • ASTM D6241, Standard Test Method for Static Puncture Strength of Geotextiles and Geotextile-Related Products Using a 50 mm Probe
  • ASTM D4751, Standard Test Methods for Determining Apparent Opening Size of a Geotextile
  • ASTM D4491, Standard Test Methods for Water Permeability of Geotextiles by Permittivity
  • ASTM D6951, Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications
  • ASTM D698 and ASTM D1557, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil
  • ASTM D6938, Standard Test Methods for In-Place Density and Water Content of Soil and Soil-Aggregate by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)
  • J. P. Giroud and Jie Han, design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads, ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (2004)
  • HSE HSG144, The safe use of vehicles on construction sites
  • HSE GS6, Avoiding danger from overhead power lines
  • The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, Part 4 — general requirements for all construction sites, including traffic routes and vehicles
  • BS 7121, Code of practice for safe use of cranes — the part covering lorry loaders
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1926.602, Material handling equipment
  • The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986
  • The Road Vehicles (Authorisation of Special Types) (General) Order 2003
  • DVSA, Load securing: vehicle operator guidance
  • EN 12195-1, Load restraint assemblies on road vehicles — Safety — Calculation of securing forces
  • Highways Act 1980

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.