Business of contracting

Pricing Your Own Work: Markup, Margin and Overhead

The van, the insurance and every hour nobody pays for have to come out of the jobs you win. The divisions to do before you write the rate.
  • 22 minReading time
  • 11Sections
  • 3Calculators inline
  • Last reviewed

Half past nine on a Sunday and the total line is still empty

The bathroom was measured on Thursday. The merchant's quotation for the suite, the tray, the boarding and the tiles came back on Friday and it is sitting in the other window. Six days on site, near enough, maybe seven if the soil pipe is where you think it is. Everything above the last line is arithmetic you have done a hundred times. The last line is a rate, and the rate came from somewhere you would rather not examine too closely — what the last customer accepted, or what did not make the woman in the kitchen flinch, or a number that has not moved since the year you bought the van.

That rate is the answer to a division most people in the trade have never done. It carries two different things at once. One is the cost of this job: the suite, the adhesive, the tip run, the wages of anybody who turns up. The other is a share of the cost of being a business at all — the van, the insurance renewals, the accountant, the ladder that walked, the Sunday evening you are currently spending. The first appears on a job sheet. The second never appears on any job sheet, in any month, which is exactly why it goes missing from the price.

What follows is not a page about what to charge. The price of a plumber-day in one town is not the price of one forty miles away, which is why this site publishes no rate list. It is a page about the divisions that have to happen before a rate means anything: what the year costs, how many hours of it anybody actually pays for, what your own time is worth against what is left at the end, and where a single percentage on top of everything quietly stops working.

What the year costs before a single job is priced

Overhead is not a percentage. It is a list of real payments with dates on them, most of which arrive whether you worked that month or not, and the only sane way to see it is annually. The van and everything that keeps it moving. Public liability, professional indemnity if you design anything, and employer's liability if anybody works for you — which in Great Britain is not optional, the Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 making it a criminal matter to be without. Tools that break or walk, and test equipment that goes away and comes back with a calibration certificate. The phone, the accountant, the software, the bank charges, the licence your work needs, the storage unit, the waste carrier account.

Then the lines nobody counts, because they arrive as evenings rather than invoices. Under regulation 7 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 the client duties on a domestic project pass to the contractor in most arrangements, so the construction phase plan required by regulation 12 is your unpaid Sunday and nobody else's. The American equivalent is the accident prevention programme and the competent-person duties in OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart C. Tickets expire on their own calendar and certificates get re-sat. None of it is billable and all of it is compulsory.

Lines that no job sheet shows, and the document that decides how each is recorded
The lineWhy the job never sees itWhere it is actually accounted for
The van: finance or depreciation, fuel, servicing, tyres, insuranceIt is consumed by every job and attributable to none, and it costs the same in a week with no work in itIRS Publication 463 for the actual-expense and standard-mileage methods; IRS Publication 946 where the vehicle is depreciated as property
Tools bought, replaced, stolen and recalibratedA tool outlives the job that justified buying it, so charging it to that job overprices one customer and underprices the next twentyIRS Publication 946 for the recovery period and any expensing election; HMRC helpsheet HS222 for capital items in a self-employed set of accounts
Public liability, employer's liability, professional indemnityThe premium is annual and the exposure is the whole book of work, not one bathroomThe Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 in Great Britain; the policy schedule and the classification it was rated on elsewhere
Health and safety documentation, training and ticket renewalsIt is done in the evening, before the job exists or after it has finishedRegulations 7 and 12 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015; OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart C in the US
The office in the spare room, the phone, the software, the accountantIt is the cost of being contactable and solvent, which is a condition of quoting rather than a part of any quoteIRS Publication 334 and Schedule C for a sole proprietor; HMRC helpsheet HS222 for the self-employed profit computation
Quoting, measuring, chasing and invoicingIt is real labour with no invoice at the end of it, and the jobs you lose consume as much of it as the jobs you winNowhere. There is no document that captures it; it exists only if you count the hours yourself
Lines that no job sheet shows, and the document that decides how each is recorded

The divisor is the number that decides everything

Overhead per hour is the annual total divided by the hours you actually invoice. Everybody assembles the numerator carefully, from bank statements and renewal notices, and then guesses the denominator — and the denominator is where the larger error lives, because it is the only one of the two that nobody sends you a letter about.

Start from the calendar and take things off it. Statutory paid holiday in Great Britain is 5.6 weeks under regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998 — four weeks and a further 1.6, which for a five-day week is twenty-eight days. Federal law in the United States sets no equivalent: the Fair Labor Standards Act requires no paid vacation and no paid sick leave at all, which makes the time a decision rather than an entitlement, not free. A sole trader who takes no holiday has paid for it in a currency the accounts do not record. Then sickness, which is unpredictable and not zero, the days lost to weather in trades that have them, and the days spent on training that expires.

Now take the second bite, out of the day rather than the year, because this is the one that surprises people. Travelling between jobs. The merchant run because the fittings were wrong. Loading and unloading. Waiting for the electrician who said Tuesday. The half hour on the phone about a job that finished in March. Writing the invoice, then chasing it. Setting up and clearing away, which on a house somebody is living in is a serious daily overhead nobody bills. Hours awake, hours worked and hours anybody pays for are three different quantities, and they diverge much further than the trade admits.

The consequence is arithmetic and it is unforgiving. Build a rate assuming you will invoice every working hour and then invoice two-thirds of them, and you have not missed overhead recovery by a third: you recovered two-thirds of what you needed, so the shortfall per invoiced hour is half again on top of what you charged. The error is invisible for eleven months, then shows up as a year that was busy from January to December with nothing at the end of it — and the natural diagnosis is that the rate was too low when the fault was the divisor. It also means utilisation is worth as much as price. An hour moved from the unbilled column to the billed one carries no extra overhead at all, which is why an afternoon spent fixing how you buy materials can pay better than an afternoon on the tools.

Keep the vocabulary straight while you do it, because three words get used interchangeably and are not interchangeable. AACE International Recommended Practice 10S-90 defines them separately: overhead is the cost of the business that no single job causes, burden is what sits on top of a wage to make it the cost of employing somebody, and margin is what is left after both. Fold burden into overhead and you will recover it twice on labour-heavy work and not at all on the rest.

  1. Take twelve months of bank and card statements, not a memory, and total every payment that would have happened even if you had booked no work. That is the numerator, once, for the year.
  2. Count the weeks you intend to be available: fifty-two, less the holiday you intend to take, less any public holidays not already sitting inside that figure — the statutory 5.6 weeks can absorb them, and subtracting both is a double count — less an honest allowance for illness and for training that falls due.
  3. Multiply by the days you work in a week and the hours you are genuinely on site in a day, ending at the hours that could in principle be invoiced.
  4. Subtract the unbilled working hours: travel, merchant runs, quoting and measuring, invoicing and chasing, van maintenance, waiting on other trades, setting up and clearing down.
  5. Divide the annual overhead by what is left. That is what every invoiced hour must carry before your own wage and before any profit, and it belongs in the cost stack rather than in the markup.
  6. Write the utilisation you have just assumed as a plain fraction of available hours, date it, and test it against reality in December — it is the assumption most likely to be wrong and the easiest to check.

Your own wage is a cost line, not what is left in the account

The commonest structural fault in a small builder's pricing is treating the owner's living as the residue. Net profit on a Schedule C, or the taxable profit an HMRC self-employed computation arrives at, is what the business earned after everything except you. If your own wage is not in the cost stack, every price you write has a hole in it exactly the size of what you need to live on, and it is a hole you will only find by failing to fill it.

There are two hats and they are paid for different things. On the tools you are labour, and the price of that hour is what you would have to pay a competent person to do the same work, burden included — no more, because a business does not become efficient by valuing its owner sentimentally, and no less, because a day spent tiling is a day not spent selling, buying or running anything. Whatever survives that wage and every other cost is the return on owning the firm, which is a separate thing entirely. Collapsing the two is how a sole trader ends a good year unable to say whether they ran a profitable business or had a well-paid job with a van attached to it.

Legal form changes the vocabulary and not the arithmetic. A sole trader draws; a limited company or an S corporation pays a salary, and in the United States the Internal Revenue Service's long-standing position on reasonable compensation for shareholder-employees means that salary is not a number you may set to zero for convenience. Whichever applies, the figure goes above the line, in the cost the markup is calculated on, not below it where it competes with profit for whatever survives.

Two ways to recover overhead, and the way that recovers it twice

There are exactly two honest routes. Load overhead into the hourly rate, so every hour you sell carries its share and the quote is hours times a rate that already contains the van; or hold overhead out of the rate, price the job at bare direct cost, and add a percentage on top covering overhead and profit together. Both work, and both are used across the industry. What does not work is doing both at once — a loaded rate with a full overhead markup over it charges for the van twice, and the price then loses jobs for a reason nobody will ever explain to you.

The second route has a subtler fault that costs more, and it is a mix problem. A single percentage on total cost recovers overhead in proportion to what you bought rather than what you did. Take two jobs at the same price: one an expensive appliance supplied and fitted in a day, the other six days of labour and a van full of very little. The same percentage collects the same money from each, but the second consumed six times as much of your year — six days of van, six days of insurance exposure, six days you could not be anywhere else. The first overpays for the office and the second underpays for it, and a firm whose work drifts towards labour will watch its margins erode with no single job ever looking wrong.

The fix is to stop pretending one percentage describes two different things. Overhead is mostly driven by time, so put it where the time is: a loaded labour rate carrying the office and the van, and a separate, smaller percentage on materials covering what materials actually cost you to handle — collection, storage, breakage, returns, the guarantee you are giving on somebody else's product, and the money tied up between paying the merchant and being paid yourself. Call it a handling charge, because that is what it is, and it becomes defensible in a conversation instead of looking like a cut of a boiler.

That leaves the base, which is where markup goes wrong most often. Markup is a percentage of cost and margin a percentage of price; they diverge as the number rises, and the conversion is worked through in full from the buyer's side on this site's quote-comparison guide. The question here is different — a percentage of which cost? Twenty on a bare wage, twenty on a wage plus burden, and twenty on a loaded rate that already contains overhead are three prices, and only one of them is the one you meant. Write down what your cost base includes before choosing a percentage, and keep it identical from job to job, or the percentage measures nothing.

Run it twice with the same markup and the same total cost, but split differently — once material-heavy, once labour-heavy — and look at the markup amount it returns. It is identical, which is exactly the problem: those two jobs did not consume the same amount of your year. Then run it again on a cost base that already carries your loaded rate, and watch the price move without anything about the work changing.

Your direct cost for materials on this job.

Your direct labor cost for this job (wages, not billed rate).

The percentage added on top of costs to cover overhead and profit.

Total price to charge

$9,600

High confidence
Cost subtotal
$8,000
Markup amount
$1,600
Gross margin on the price
16.67 %

What this calculation does not cover

  • Only two cost lines feed the subtotal — materials and labor. Permits, equipment and tool rental, dumpster and disposal fees, subcontractor invoices, insurance, fuel and supervision are not inputs, so anything you have not already buried inside those two figures is neither marked up nor billed.
  • Materials and labor are marked up at one identical rate, because the percentage is applied once to their combined subtotal. If you price material at one percentage and labor at another — a common split — price the two separately and add the results, since a single blended figure here will not reproduce that.
  • The markup amount in the breakdown is gross, not profit: it is the one figure that has to carry overhead and profit together, and there is no overhead input to separate them. Office costs, vehicles, estimating time and idle days come out of that same amount before anything is left over.
  • The gross margin row is the same money expressed against the price instead of against the cost, and it is always the smaller percentage of the two — a 20 per cent markup is a 16.7 per cent margin. It is shown because the two are routinely used interchangeably and are not equal; it is still gross, so overhead has not been taken out of it, and it is not a net profit figure.
  • Nothing is added after the markup — the total is exactly the subtotal multiplied by one plus your percentage. Sales tax, VAT or GST, permit fees passed through to the client, and card or financing charges all sit outside it, so the number is a price to quote rather than a finished invoice.
  • The costs you enter are treated as final and already known. There is no waste allowance and no contingency term, so if supplier prices move between quote and purchase or the hours run long, the overrun comes out of the markup instead of being added to the price.
  • Each cost line accepts up to 500,000 and the markup up to 200 per cent, which caps how large a single job this will price without splitting it. The currency is a label only: the answer comes back in whatever currency you typed the costs in, with no conversion and no rounding to a tidy quotable figure.

What an hour of somebody else's time costs you

Hours multiplied by rate multiplied by crew is where a labour price starts, and it is the wage rather than the cost. The gap between the two is the reason firms that price off wages go out of business slowly while believing they are winning work.

What sits on top is specific and mostly compulsory. Employer payroll taxes. Workers' compensation, rated by class code under the NCCI Basic Manual for Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance in the states that use it — which is why a roofer-hour and a painter-hour differ at an identical wage, since the risk and not the skill sets that number. Employer's liability cover in Great Britain. Pension contributions. Statutory holiday: paying fifty-two weeks of wage for the 46.4 weeks left after 5.6 weeks of leave is an uplift of about twelve per cent before anything else is added. Sick pay, PPE, tickets and medicals, and the paid hours in which nothing productive happens because the work was not ready. The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics measures the whole split in its Employer Costs for Employee Compensation series, which is where to read the shape of it rather than guess.

Overtime is where a promise made on site raises a price after the price was agreed. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act the premium is not one and a half times the base wage but one and a half times the regular rate, and 29 CFR Part 778 is explicit that the regular rate sweeps in most non-discretionary payments — a completion bonus offered to get a job finished by Friday retroactively lifts the overtime rate for the weeks it covers. On federally funded work the Davis-Bacon wage determination applicable to the contract sets a floor you do not get to price below, whatever your own men normally earn, and the labour standards that go with it are in 29 CFR Part 5.

Subcontracting relocates all of this rather than escaping it. The day rate a subcontractor quotes already contains their own overhead, insurance and unbilled hours, which is exactly what it should contain. What changes is your exposure to getting the status wrong: the classification tests in IRS Publication 15-A decide whether the person you are calling a subcontractor is one, and if they are not, the burden was always yours and arrives late with interest on it. In the United Kingdom, deducting from the labour element of a subcontractor's payment under HMRC's CIS340 is a timing arrangement with the Revenue, not a saving.

Price the crew forwards first, at the wage: hours per person, rate, crew size. Then run it a second time with the same hours and a rate uplifted by everything in the paragraphs above — taxes, compensation cover, holiday accrual, non-productive time. The difference between the two totals is what you would have handed over if you had quoted from the payroll figure, and on a long job it is not a rounding error.

Labor Cost Calculator

The total hours the job is expected to take, per worker.

The rate charged (or paid) per worker, per hour.

The number of workers billed at this hourly rate.

Total crew-hours

40 hours

Medium confidence

Figures that depend on a rate wait for yours — this page does not assume one.

What this calculation does not cover

  • One rate is multiplied across every hour and every worker, so there is no tier for overtime or holiday premiums, night and weekend differentials, or a crew that pairs a licensed lead with an apprentice — a mixed-rate job has to be totalled in separate runs and added by hand.
  • Crew size acts as a straight multiplier on the hours you entered, which assumes each additional worker stays productive for the full duration: the tasks that will not split across two pairs of hands, the time a crew loses coordinating, and the helper who is only on site for part of the week all leave the total untouched.
  • Nothing distinguishes a wage you pay from a rate you are charged, because the same multiplication runs on either. A figure built from raw wages carries no payroll taxes, workers' compensation, insurance or benefits on top of it, while a contractor's quoted rate may already have overhead and profit buried inside — the answer looks identical in both cases.
  • Only worked hours are priced. Travel and mobilization, setup and clean-up, tool or equipment hire, disposal, permits and materials all sit outside the figure, and no minimum charge is imposed either — an entry of half an hour returns half an hour of money on a job many trades would bill as a minimum visit.
  • The hours you type are taken exactly as they stand, with no contingency for rework, weather, waiting on an inspection or scope that grows once the walls are open, and the rate is held flat for the whole span — a long program approaching the 2,000-hour entry ceiling is still priced at today's number, with no escalation partway through.

The quotes you did not win are inside the price of the one you did

Pricing the bathroom took an evening. Measuring it took most of a morning, including the drive. Do that arithmetic across a year and it is one of the largest single lines in your unbilled hours — and unlike the others it scales with how often you lose. If a quote costs you half a day all in and you win one in three, then every won job carries a day and a half of selling. That time is either inside your overhead, and therefore inside your rate, or it is nowhere, being paid for out of your evenings.

Once the number exists there are two levers. Quote less — qualify harder on the phone, decline the ones you can tell are shopping, and where the trade allows it charge for a measured survey and credit it against the job if it goes ahead. Or win more, which usually means quoting a narrower kind of work rather than dropping the price. The win rate is itself diagnostic: a very high one suggests pricing below the market, a very low one suggests quoting into a market that was never going to buy from you, and both are cheaper to discover in your own diary than in a bank statement.

The extra that pays worse than the job it interrupts

An extra costs more than the work in it, and the excess is nearly all fixed. Stopping and restarting. Re-planning the week. The unplanned merchant run. The wait while somebody decides. The knock-on to the trade booked for Thursday. The paperwork, the separate invoice, the second chase. Almost none of that scales with the value of the change — a small extra and a large one consume roughly the same amount of it — so a percentage markup on its own under-recovers badly at the small end, on precisely the changes that happen most often.

That is what a flat handling charge per change is for. It recovers a real cost rather than punishing anybody, and it is far easier to defend written into the contract before anyone wanted anything than appearing for the first time on an invoice in week five. Agree the rate for varied work and the handling charge when you agree the price, and the only argument left is about quantities. How a change gets instructed, and which basis it should be valued on, is covered on this site's variations guide; the question here is narrower and entirely yours — whether the number you are about to say out loud covers what the change will cost you.

Which brings up the sentence that has cost the trade more than any other: I will do it while I am here. Sometimes that is a sound commercial decision taken deliberately, because the customer is worth keeping. Usually it is a discount handed over without anybody computing it. If the extra takes half a day and the job was priced at six, you have discounted the job by a share of itself you could have written down in ten seconds, at the exact moment your position was strongest. The same arithmetic sets a minimum charge: below some size an extra costs more to sell, schedule and invoice than the work in it earns, and the honest answer is the minimum or a firm no.

Put the real cost of the change in the additional work field — the materials, the labour, and the hours the disruption takes off the rest of the week — then set the administrative fee, which is the handling charge under another name, to what the paperwork, the extra merchant run and the re-sequencing genuinely cost you. Now halve the work value and run it again. The markup halves with it; the fee does not move at all, so its share of the price roughly doubles. That is the whole argument for having one.

Your direct material + labor cost for the added scope.

Markup applied to the additional work, same as your normal project markup.

A flat fee covering paperwork, re-scheduling, and coordination overhead.

Total change order cost

$2,400

High confidence
Markup amount
$300

What this calculation does not cover

  • Markup lands on the added work cost alone — the administrative fee is added after it and is never marked up, so a contract that allows markup on the processing charge will settle slightly above this figure.
  • One percentage covers the whole variation, with no split between overhead and profit and no separate rate for subcontracted work; where a sub's price already carries its own uplift, no second tier is stacked on top of it here.
  • Time is absent from the arithmetic. Nothing is priced for extra days on site, extended preliminaries, or the disruption to work already sequenced around the original scope, which on a mid-project change is often the larger number.
  • The flat fee is counted once per run. Several small variations that each trigger their own charge, or one order bundling unrelated items, have to be worked through individually rather than as a single lump.
  • Deductive changes have no route in: the added work cost cannot be taken below zero, so a credit for scope removed has to be handled as its own line away from this page.
  • The added work cost is entered as one figure, so nothing distinguishes short-notice material pricing, restocking on cancelled orders, or remedial work to undo what was already built — those belong inside the number you type, or they are missing from the total.

Money that passes through you and was never yours

A bank balance is not a profit, and this is where small firms most often mistake one for the other. Sales tax or VAT collected on somebody else's behalf, deductions held for the revenue, retention held back by a main contractor, a deposit taken against material not yet ordered — each sits in the same account as your money and looks exactly like it. Spending it is not fraud and not even unusual; it is borrowing from a creditor who has not asked yet, and the asking has a fixed date.

Two United Kingdom mechanisms are worth understanding before you price rather than after you invoice. The domestic reverse charge in HMRC VAT Notice 735 moves VAT accounting on many business-to-business construction supplies to the customer, so a subcontractor accustomed to holding that cash for a quarter no longer does — a serious working capital change with no effect whatever on profit, which is exactly what catches a firm pricing off its bank balance. And the Construction Industry Scheme in HMRC's CIS340 requires a contractor to deduct from the labour element of a subcontractor's payment at the rate their registration attracts and pay it over. Neither is a cost; both change when money is yours to use.

On the American side the discipline is the opposite: nothing is withheld for you at all. A sole proprietor pays through quarterly estimated payments on Form 1040-ES and carries self-employment tax on Schedule SE — both halves of it, employer and employee, which an employed tradesman never sees on a payslip. That belongs in what an hour of your own time has to earn, not in an unpleasant April. One entitlement runs the other way and is routinely forgotten: on business-to-business work in the United Kingdom the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 gives a statutory right to interest and a fixed recovery sum, which a domestic customer never triggers, so it is worth knowing which of your customers you may charge for slow payment. When a payment falls due in the first place is settled on this site's stage-payments guide.

What five per cent off actually costs

The discount conversation happens at the door, cheerfully, with a round number attached, and the arithmetic behind it is short enough to do standing up. If your net margin is a given share of price and you cut the price by a smaller share of it, what is left is the difference between the two — and to earn the same money as before you need the ratio of the old margin to the new one in extra work. Not extra profit and not extra turnover either — turnover rises by rather less, because every one of those extra jobs is sold at the reduced price. Extra work, at extra risk, out of the same year.

That ratio behaves violently at the margins most small contractors actually run at, and this is the table worth carrying in your head rather than in a spreadsheet.

Read it backwards too, because that is the more useful reading: a firm that raises its prices can lose a meaningful share of its work and still finish ahead, which is the arithmetic case for walking away from the job you can already tell will be difficult. Underneath both readings sits the break-even figure — annual overhead divided by the share of each pound of turnover that survives direct costs — which is the revenue the year has to produce before any of it is yours. That number, not the length of the order book, is what separates profitable from busy. For a comparison against the wider trade rather than against your own last year, the National Association of Home Builders publishes its Cost of Doing Business Study and the Construction Financial Management Association its Construction Industry Annual Financial Survey; both are aggregates from other people's books, for asking why you sit where you do rather than for setting a target.

Work needed to stand still after a discount, as plain arithmetic — assuming the cost of doing each job does not fall with the price
Net margin beforeDiscount givenProfit left, on the original priceWork needed to earn the same money
15% of price2.5% off12.5%1.2 times as much work
15% of price5% off10%1.5 times as much work
10% of price2.5% off7.5%1.33 times as much work
10% of price5% off5%twice as much work
8% of price5% off3%2.67 times as much work
5% of price2.5% off2.5%twice as much work
Work needed to stand still after a discount, as plain arithmetic — assuming the cost of doing each job does not fall with the price

The only proof is the job you finished last month

Every figure on this page is an assumption until a finished job tests it, so test them on the cheapest possible sample: write the quoted hours on the job file, write the actual hours beside them as the week goes, and do the same for the material. Whether a job currently running is ahead or behind is a live measurement and a different exercise, handled on this site's job-tracking guide; what is wanted here is the backward look, on work already finished and paid for. Ten jobs of that beats any amount of reasoning on a Sunday evening, because it catches the two failures that never announce themselves — a trade you under-price by a predictable amount every time, and a customer type whose jobs always run long for reasons that have nothing to do with the work.

Then rebuild the divisor once a year, in a quiet week, from what actually happened rather than from what you planned. The van gets older and dearer to keep. Insurance moves. The phone bill does not. A rate built on last year's overhead and the year before's optimism about billable hours is not a price, it is a hope with a decimal point in it — and the whole point of doing the division is that the number you write at half past nine on a Sunday is one you can defend on a Monday.

Six numbers to fix before the next quote goes out

None of these is a price and none of them is anybody else's to give you. They are the figures your own rate is made of, worked out once a year and then used on every job until the next January.

  • The annual cost of existing, taken off twelve months of statements — Van, insurance, tools, phone, accountant, software, licences, storage, training and the health and safety documentation that no client ever pays for — totalled once, for the whole year, from payments rather than memory.
  • Invoiced hours per year, not available hours — Fifty-two weeks less the holiday you take, less any public holidays that figure does not already absorb, less sickness and training, then less travel, merchant runs, quoting, invoicing and setting up. This is the divisor, and it is where the larger error usually is.
  • Your own wage, sitting above the line — What you would have to pay a competent person to do the work you do on the tools, priced into cost before any markup, so that profit is what remains after you are paid rather than the thing you live on.
  • One recovery route, chosen and written down — Either a loaded hourly rate carrying overhead, or a bare rate with a percentage on top — never both, and if a percentage, define exactly which cost base it applies to and keep that base identical from job to job.
  • The cost of an employed or subcontracted hour, not the wage — Payroll taxes, compensation cover rated by class, holiday accrual, pension, PPE and non-productive time. Statutory holiday alone is 5.6 weeks under the Working Time Regulations 1998, before anything else is added.
  • A rate for varied work and a flat handling charge per change — Agreed at the same moment as the price, because the administration of a change costs nearly the same whether the change is large or small, and a percentage on its own never recovers it at the small end.
Open this as a workspace →

Opens the calculators above on one screen with the dimensions from this article already filled in. Quantities only — this site publishes no price list, because local prices vary too much to publish honestly.

Drawn from

  • AACE International Recommended Practice No. 10S-90, Cost Engineering Terminology — definitions of overhead, burden, markup and margin
  • Working Time Regulations 1998, regulations 13 and 13A — annual leave of four weeks and an additional 1.6 weeks
  • Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 — no requirement for paid vacation or paid sick leave
  • 29 CFR Part 778, Overtime Compensation — the regular rate on which the overtime premium is computed
  • 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (Davis-Bacon and Related Acts)
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation
  • NCCI, Basic Manual for Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance — classification and rating by trade
  • Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969
  • The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 — regulation 7 (domestic clients) and regulation 12 (construction phase plan and health and safety file)
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart C, General Safety and Health Provisions
  • IRS Publication 334, Tax Guide for Small Business
  • IRS Publication 463, Travel, Gift, and Car Expenses
  • IRS Publication 946, How To Depreciate Property
  • IRS Publication 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide — worker classification tests
  • IRS Form 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for Individuals, and Schedule SE (Form 1040), Self-Employment Tax
  • HMRC helpsheet HS222, How to calculate your taxable profits
  • HMRC CIS340, Construction Industry Scheme — guide for contractors and subcontractors
  • HMRC VAT Notice 735, Domestic reverse charge procedure — building and construction services
  • Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998
  • National Association of Home Builders, Cost of Doing Business Study
  • Construction Financial Management Association, Construction Industry Annual Financial Survey

Guidance, not a specification. Local codes, the engineer of record and the product manufacturer’s instructions govern where they differ from anything written here.