Heavy Civil & Infrastructure

Excavation Shoring Lateral Active Soil Pressure Calculator (Rankine)

Estimate the lateral active earth pressure a shoring wall or trench box must resist, using the classical Rankine theory for cohesionless soil.

  • Answers as you type
  • Every formula cited
  • Calculated in your browser
SettingsSettings for this calculationUS
Market
Imperial · sales tax
The total (moist) unit weight of the retained soil — γ, not its dry density.

Common soils typically fall between 17 and 20 kN/m³, which is roughly 108 to 127 pcf. Use a project-specific geotechnical report for the actual value — this is not a value the calculator should assume for a real design.

The soil's internal friction angle, in degrees, used in the Rankine active pressure coefficient.

This formula assumes cohesionless (granular) soil. Sand typically ranges 28-40°. This value must come from a geotechnical report — it cannot be reliably assumed from visual soil classification alone.

The vertical height of the excavation face or shoring wall being checked.

Measured from the base of the cut to the ground surface (or top of the shoring), assuming a horizontal ground surface with no surcharge.

Total active lateral force per unit length of wall

1,900 lbf/ft

Low confidence

This is a preliminary Rankine active-pressure estimate for COHESIONLESS soil under simplified conditions (no water table, no surcharge, vertical smooth wall) — a screening/educational estimate, NOT a stamped design. Cohesive soils, groundwater, surcharge loads (equipment, spoil piles, adjacent structures), sloped ground, braced/strutted multi-level systems (which use Peck's empirical apparent-pressure diagrams instead), and seismic loading all require different methods not captured here. Per OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P, the actual excavation protective system must be selected by a competent person using the Subpart P tables or designed by a registered professional engineer using site-specific geotechnical data — this calculator is not a substitute for that process.

Peak lateral pressure at base of cut
381.95 psf
Active pressure coefficient Ka
0.33 (dimensionless)
Then change the inputs to see how far the answer moves.

Show calculation logic

How this was calculated

Formula source(s)

  • Rankine active earth pressure theory for a cohesionless soil, vertical smooth wall, horizontal ground surface, no surcharge, no water table: Ka = tan²(45° − φ/2); peak pressure at base p_max = γ×H×Ka; total active force per unit length of wall Pa = 0.5×γ×H²×Ka. This is the standard textbook formula (used in the Caltrans Trenching and Shoring Manual and standard geotechnical references). OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P classifies soil by Type A/B/C using field tests (unconfined compressive strength), NOT by friction angle or Ka — the actual protective system must be selected per Subpart P's prescriptive tables or designed by a registered professional engineer (1926.652(b)/(c)); this formula is not itself an OSHA-published method.

Inputs used

Soil Unit Weight γ
114.59 pcf
Soil Internal Friction Angle φ (°, Typical Range 28-40° for Sand — Requires a Geotechnical Report)
30
Excavation/Retained Height
10 ft

Intermediate steps

Peak lateral pressure at base of cut
381.95 psf
Active pressure coefficient Ka
0.33 (dimensionless)
Final result1,909.76 lbf/ft

Confidence note: This is a preliminary Rankine active-pressure estimate for COHESIONLESS soil under simplified conditions (no water table, no surcharge, vertical smooth wall) — a screening/educational estimate, NOT a stamped design. Cohesive soils, groundwater, surcharge loads (equipment, spoil piles, adjacent structures), sloped ground, braced/strutted multi-level systems (which use Peck's empirical apparent-pressure diagrams instead), and seismic loading all require different methods not captured here. Per OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P, the actual excavation protective system must be selected by a competent person using the Subpart P tables or designed by a registered professional engineer using site-specific geotechnical data — this calculator is not a substitute for that process.

What this calculation does not cover

  • There is no water in this model. Below a water table the soil pushes with its buoyant weight, but the water adds its own full hydrostatic pressure on top, and Ka does not reduce that part — the load on a saturated face is much higher than the figure here. Perched water, seepage through a granular lens, and a table that rises after rain are not checked at all.
  • No surcharge is included. Spoil heaped along the crest, an excavator or crane tracking beside the cut, stacked pipe, site traffic, and the footings of any adjacent structure all add lateral load this ignores. On a tight site the surcharge can be the larger part of the total.
  • Active pressure only develops if the wall moves enough to let the soil behind it relax. A stiff or tightly propped wall that cannot yield attracts at-rest pressure, which is substantially higher, and a multi-level braced excavation is designed to an apparent-pressure envelope of a different shape entirely. Size a strut off this triangular distribution and it comes out light.
  • The formula is for cohesionless granular soil against a vertical smooth wall with level ground. It carries no cohesion term, no wall friction, no allowance for sloped or benched ground above the cut, and no layering — clay, silt and mixed fill do not behave this way, and a cohesive face standing unsupported for a shift is not evidence the pressure is low.
  • This is a pressure figure, not a shoring design. It does not size sheets, soldier piles, wales, struts or anchors, does not set embedment depth below formation, applies no factor of safety, and checks nothing for toe stability, base heave or overall slope failure. Under OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P the protective system must come from the Subpart P tables, a trench shield manufacturer's tabulated data, or a registered professional engineer's design.

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 1,900 lbf/ft — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

10 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

Computed in your browser — nothing you enter is uploaded. Presented in US customary units and US trade terminology. Where a formula follows a published standard, that standard and its edition are cited beside it on this page; where none governs, the page says so. Local amendments override model codes — verify against the code in force where you build.

Sources checked 2026-09-02 · in the site-wide review of 2026-09-06 · v1.0.1

Regulatory standards & verification citations1
  1. Rankine active earth pressure theory for a cohesionless soil, vertical smooth wall, horizontal ground surface, no surcharge, no water table: Ka = tan²(45° − φ/2); peak pressure at base p_max = γ×H×Ka; total active force per unit length of wall Pa = 0.5×γ×H²×Ka. This is the standard textbook formula (used in the Caltrans Trenching and Shoring Manual and standard geotechnical references). OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P classifies soil by Type A/B/C using field tests (unconfined compressive strength), NOT by friction angle or Ka — the actual protective system must be selected per Subpart P's prescriptive tables or designed by a registered professional engineer (1926.652(b)/(c)); this formula is not itself an OSHA-published method.
Cite this page

Your workspace

Most jobs need more than one number. Add the calculators you need next and they open right here, underneath this one — your figures stay on screen and nothing is lost to a page change.

Now that you have the number

These guides cover the work this quantity is for — the first ones run this calculator inside the section that raises the question.

Called something else where you work? Trench support — the term in each market, how close the equivalence really is, and the standard that governs it.

Still deciding? Sloping vs Shoring an Excavation — the factors that actually differ, with no invented prices.

How to calculate excavation shoring lateral active soil pressure (Rankine) in 4 steps

  1. Soil Unit Weight γThe total (moist) unit weight of the retained soil — γ, not its dry density.
  2. Soil Internal Friction Angle φ (°, Typical Range 28-40° for Sand — Requires a Geotechnical Report)The soil's internal friction angle, in degrees, used in the Rankine active pressure coefficient.
  3. Excavation/Retained HeightThe vertical height of the excavation face or shoring wall being checked.
  4. Total active lateral force per unit length of wallThe tool computes the total active lateral force per unit length of wall from those figures and shows the formula, its sources, and a confidence rating alongside it.

Total active lateral force per unit length of wall by soil unit weight γ

Page defaults, not your figures above.

Soil Unit Weight γTotal active lateral force per unit length of wall (lbf/ft)
80 pcf1,292
100 pcf1,615
120 pcf1,938
140 pcf2,260

Frequently asked questions

Does this account for OSHA's soil classification (Type A/B/C)?
No. OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P classifies soil by Type A/B/C using field tests such as unconfined compressive strength — not by friction angle or the Rankine active pressure coefficient (Ka). The actual protective system for an excavation must be selected using Subpart P's prescriptive tables or designed by a registered professional engineer per 1926.652(b)/(c); this formula is not itself an OSHA-published method.
What conditions does this Rankine formula assume, and when does it not apply?
It assumes cohesionless soil, a vertical smooth wall, a horizontal ground surface, no surcharge, and no water table. Cohesive soils, groundwater, surcharge loads (equipment, spoil piles, adjacent structures), sloped ground, braced/strutted multi-level systems (which instead use Peck's empirical apparent-pressure diagrams), and seismic loading all require different methods this calculator does not capture.
Is this enough to design a shoring system?
No — this is a preliminary screening/educational estimate only, not a stamped design. Per OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P, the excavation protective system must be selected by a competent person using the Subpart P tables or designed by a registered professional engineer using site-specific geotechnical data.
Preliminary estimate, not certified engineering. This tool produces an indicative quantity calculation for planning purposes only — it is not a certified structural analysis, a guaranteed material takeoff, or a substitute for building department approval. Always verify measurements on-site and have a licensed contractor or structural engineer review any load-bearing, code-sensitive, or safety-critical work before purchasing materials or starting construction. Spotted an arithmetic or standards error? Report it to contact@craftquantities.com with your inputs — a confirmed fix gets a permanent check of its own, so the same mistake cannot come back.