Heavy Civil & Infrastructure

Pile Group Efficiency Calculator (Converse-Labarre)

Estimate the reduction in per-pile capacity when piles are installed close together in a group, using the Converse-Labarre formula.

  • Answers as you type
  • Every formula cited
  • Calculated in your browser
SettingsSettings for this calculationUS
Market
Imperial · sales tax
The diameter of each pile in the group.

The shaft diameter, used here only as the yardstick for spacing — group efficiency is governed by the spacing-to-diameter ratio, so this figure and the spacing have to be in the same terms. Groups are commonly spaced at three diameters; below about 2.5 the interaction is severe enough that the Converse-Labarre arrangement is being asked a question outside where it is usually applied.

The center-to-center spacing between adjacent piles.

Closer spacing (smaller ratio to diameter) reduces group efficiency, since neighboring piles' stress zones overlap more.

The number of pile rows in the group.

Rows in one direction of the grid, with columns counted in the other. It does not matter which direction you call rows as long as the two numbers describe the grid — three by four and four by three give the same efficiency. What does matter is that this describes a RECTANGULAR grid: a group with a pile missing, or one arranged in a circle or a triangle, is not what this formula counts.

The number of pile columns in the group.

The other dimension of the grid. A single row of piles — any number by one — has less interaction than a square group of the same count, because each pile has fewer neighbours: nine piles in a line are more efficient than nine in a three-by-three. If the count is not a rectangle, round to the grid the piles are actually set out on rather than forcing the total into two factors.

Group efficiency factor

0.727 (Eg)

Medium confidence

The Converse-Labarre formula is a widely-used but empirical approximation — some geotechnical engineers consider group efficiency for friction piles in clay more reliably assessed with a block failure check instead, especially for closely-spaced groups.

θ = arctan(d/s)
18.43 °
Then change the inputs to see how far the answer moves.

Show calculation logic

How this was calculated

Formula source(s)

  • Converse-Labarre pile group efficiency formula: Eg = 1 − θ x [(n−1)m + (m−1)n] / (90mn), where θ = arctan(d/s) in degrees, d is pile diameter, s is center-to-center spacing, m is the number of rows, and n is the number of columns

Inputs used

Pile Diameter (d)
16 in
Center-to-Center Spacing (s)
4 ft
Number of pile rows m
3
Number of Columns (n)
3

Intermediate steps

θ = arctan(d/s)
18.43 °
Final result0.73 (Eg)

Confidence note: The Converse-Labarre formula is a widely-used but empirical approximation — some geotechnical engineers consider group efficiency for friction piles in clay more reliably assessed with a block failure check instead, especially for closely-spaced groups.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The result is the Converse-Labarre per-pile efficiency and nothing else. It does not check block failure, where the piles and the soil between them fail as one mass — for friction piles in clay at close spacing that check often governs and gives the lower capacity, so it has to be run separately and the lower of the two used.
  • The formula reads only diameter, spacing and grid size. It knows nothing about soil type, pile length or installation method, so it returns the same reduction for a driven pile in dense sand as for a bored pile in soft clay. Driven piles in loose to medium sand can reach an efficiency of 1.0 or higher because driving densifies the ground between them, and piles end-bearing on rock see essentially no group reduction — this calculator never returns either.
  • This is a capacity reduction factor, not a foundation design. It applies no factor of safety or resistance factor, and it covers no settlement check — a pile group settles more than a single pile carrying the same load per pile, and settlement rather than capacity often governs the design.
  • It assumes one rectangular grid of identical vertical piles at a single uniform spacing in both directions. Staggered or triangular layouts, raked piles, mixed pile diameters within the group, irregular group outlines and different row and column spacings are all outside the model.
  • It applies no minimum spacing check. Buildable centre-to-centre spacing is set by the governing code and by piling rig tolerance, and this calculator will return a number for spacings closer than those permit — including spacings below one pile diameter, which is not a pile group at all.
5 ft1 m4 ft1.22 m16 in406.4 mm9 piles

Computed in your browser — nothing you enter is uploaded. Presented in US customary units and US trade terminology. Where a formula follows a published standard, that standard and its edition are cited beside it on this page; where none governs, the page says so. Local amendments override model codes — verify against the code in force where you build.

Sources checked 2026-09-02 · in the site-wide review of 2026-09-06 · v1.0.1

Regulatory standards & verification citations1
  1. Converse-Labarre pile group efficiency formula: Eg = 1 − θ x [(n−1)m + (m−1)n] / (90mn), where θ = arctan(d/s) in degrees, d is pile diameter, s is center-to-center spacing, m is the number of rows, and n is the number of columns
Cite this page

Your workspace

Most jobs need more than one number. Add the calculators you need next and they open right here, underneath this one — your figures stay on screen and nothing is lost to a page change.

Now that you have the number

These guides cover the work this quantity is for — the first ones run this calculator inside the section that raises the question.

Still deciding? Piles vs Ground Improvement — the factors that actually differ, with no invented prices.

How to calculate pile group efficiency (Converse-Labarre) in 5 steps

  1. Pile Diameter (d)The diameter of each pile in the group.
  2. Center-to-Center Spacing (s)The center-to-center spacing between adjacent piles.
  3. Number of pile rows mThe number of pile rows in the group.
  4. Number of Columns (n)The number of pile columns in the group.
  5. Group efficiency factorThe tool computes the group efficiency factor from those figures and shows the formula, its sources, and a confidence rating alongside it.

Group efficiency factor by pile diameter (d)

Page defaults, not your figures above.

Pile Diameter (d)Group efficiency factor ((Eg))
10 in0.823
15 in0.739
20 in0.66
25 in0.587
30 in0.52

Frequently asked questions

Why do piles in a group have less capacity per pile than an isolated pile?
Each pile's zone of soil stress overlaps with its neighbors' zones — closely-spaced piles effectively compete for the same soil resistance, reducing the group's total capacity below the simple sum of each pile's individual capacity.
How is group capacity actually used?
Multiply the group efficiency factor by (number of piles x individual pile capacity) to get the group's usable capacity — or compare that against the equivalent "block" capacity of the whole group treated as one large pier, and use whichever governs (is lower).
Does wider spacing always mean better efficiency?
Yes — efficiency approaches 100% as spacing increases relative to pile diameter, since the piles' stress zones stop overlapping — but wider spacing also means a bigger, more expensive pile cap and foundation footprint.
Preliminary estimate, not certified engineering. This tool produces an indicative quantity calculation for planning purposes only — it is not a certified structural analysis, a guaranteed material takeoff, or a substitute for building department approval. Always verify measurements on-site and have a licensed contractor or structural engineer review any load-bearing, code-sensitive, or safety-critical work before purchasing materials or starting construction. Spotted an arithmetic or standards error? Report it to contact@craftquantities.com with your inputs — a confirmed fix gets a permanent check of its own, so the same mistake cannot come back.