Measurements & Conversions

pcf to kg/m³ Calculator

Convert pounds per cubic foot to kilograms per cubic metre — for compaction reports, fill densities and imperial mix data going metric.

  • Answers as you type
  • Every formula cited
  • Calculated in your browser
SettingsSettings for this calculationUS
Market
Imperial · sales tax
The unit weight in pounds per cubic foot.

Take the figure from the line your specification names. Compaction is written against a maximum dry density, so a field sheet's wet density is the wrong number to convert even though it is the larger and more prominent one on the page. For concrete, 145 pcf is the usual plain-concrete value and 150 pcf the one used once reinforcement is included.

Density

1,922 kg/m³

High confidence

Converted using an exact defined factor of 16.018463374 kg/m³ per lb/ft³. Fixed by definition, so any error will lie in which density the field sheet gave you rather than in the conversion.

Conversion factor applied
16.02 kg/m³ per lb/ft³
Then change the inputs to see how far the answer moves.

Show calculation logic

How this was calculated

Formula source(s)

  • A pound in a cubic foot, expressed in metric: 0.45359237 kg divided by 0.028316846592 m³ gives 16.018463373960139579… kg/m³. Both constants are definitions, so the ratio is exact even though its decimal never closes.

Inputs used

Unit weight (lb/ft³)
120

Intermediate steps

Conversion factor applied
16.02 kg/m³ per lb/ft³
Final result1,922.22 kg/m³

Confidence note: Converted using an exact defined factor of 16.018463374 kg/m³ per lb/ft³. Fixed by definition, so any error will lie in which density the field sheet gave you rather than in the conversion.

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 1,922 kg/m³ — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

Computed in your browser — nothing you enter is uploaded. Presented in US customary units and US trade terminology. Where a formula follows a published standard, that standard and its edition are cited beside it on this page; where none governs, the page says so. Local amendments override model codes — verify against the code in force where you build.

Sources checked 2026-08-26 · in the site-wide review of 2026-09-06 · v1.0.0

Regulatory standards & verification citations1
  1. A pound in a cubic foot, expressed in metric: 0.45359237 kg divided by 0.028316846592 m³ gives 16.018463373960139579… kg/m³. Both constants are definitions, so the ratio is exact even though its decimal never closes.
Cite this page

Your workspace

Most jobs need more than one number. Add the calculators you need next and they open right here, underneath this one — your figures stay on screen and nothing is lost to a page change.

Earthworks paperwork is where this direction lives. A nuclear gauge printout or a Proctor curve reports pounds per cubic foot, while the settlement model, the compaction clause or the client sits in metric. Field sheets carry three densities together — wet, dry and maximum dry — and choosing the wrong line costs far more than any rounding afterwards, so convert the one your specification is actually written against. Mind the destination unit as well: geotechnical work outside North America is usually quoted in Mg/m³ or g/cm³, which is this result divided by a thousand, making 120 pcf read as 1.9222 Mg/m³. And 100 pcf is 1601.85 kg/m³, never the tidy 1600 that ends up in the report.

How to calculate pcf to kg/m³ in 2 steps

  1. Unit weight (lb/ft³)The unit weight in pounds per cubic foot.
  2. DensityThe tool computes the density from those figures and shows the formula, its sources, and a confidence rating alongside it.

pcf to kg/m³ at common values

Page defaults, not your figures above.

Unit weight (lb/ft³)Density (kg/m³)
20320
50801
1001,602
2003,204
5008,009
1,00016,018

Frequently asked questions

Wet density or dry density — which one do I convert?
The one your specification is written against, which for compaction is almost always dry. Wet density is the dry value multiplied by (1 + moisture content as a decimal), so at 12% moisture a 120 pcf dry density reports as 134.4 pcf wet. Converting the wet line and checking it against a dry-density requirement passes fill that has not been compacted.
My metric spec asks for Mg/m³ or g/cm³, not kg/m³.
Same number, shifted three places. Divide the kg/m³ result by 1000 and 120 pcf is 1922.2 kg/m³, 1.9222 Mg/m³ and 1.9222 g/cm³ all at once. Geotechnical reports outside North America tend to prefer Mg/m³ because it keeps field values around 2 instead of four digits long.
Why is 100 pcf not exactly 1600 kg/m³?
Because the factor is 16.0184633…, not 16. 100 pcf is 1601.85 kg/m³. The ×16 shorthand is 0.115% light — invisible on a single density, and worth about nine tonnes of paper mass across a 5000 m³ fill at that density.
The report gives a specific gravity instead of a density.
Specific gravity of solids is not a bulk density and must not be typed in here. Gs is measured against water, so Gs × 1000 gives the density of the particles themselves in kg/m³ — around 2650 for common quartz sands. Reaching a bulk unit weight from there needs the void ratio, which is a separate calculation rather than a unit conversion.
Preliminary estimate, not certified engineering. This tool produces an indicative quantity calculation for planning purposes only — it is not a certified structural analysis, a guaranteed material takeoff, or a substitute for building department approval. Always verify measurements on-site and have a licensed contractor or structural engineer review any load-bearing, code-sensitive, or safety-critical work before purchasing materials or starting construction. Spotted an arithmetic or standards error? Report it to contact@craftquantities.com with your inputs — a confirmed fix gets a permanent check of its own, so the same mistake cannot come back.