SettingsSettings for this calculationUS
The volume of gypsum waste in cubic yards.
About 0.25 short tons per cubic yard (500 lb/yd³) for broken plasterboard thrown loose into a container; published C&D factors run 394-500 lb/yd³. The board itself is roughly twice as dense.
Approximate weight
2.5 short tons
About 0.25 short tons per cubic yard (500 lb/yd³) for broken plasterboard thrown loose into a container; published C&D factors run 394-500 lb/yd³. The board itself is roughly twice as dense. A planning figure, not a specification. Confirm the figure with your supplier or waste contractor before relying on it.
- Conversion factor applied
- 0.25 short tons per yd³
They open the calculator with your figures already in it
Gypsum Waste Cubic Yards to Tons Calculator: 2.5 short tons — shown in imperial, US market. The link sets both, so the result they see is the one on your screen.
Show calculation logicHide calculation logic
How this was calculated
Formula source(s)
- Typical bulk density used here: approximately 0.25 short tons per cubic yard
- Density varies with moisture, grading and how the material was processed
Inputs used
- Gypsum Waste volume (yd³)
- 10
Intermediate steps
- Conversion factor applied
- 0.25 short tons per yd³
Confidence note: About 0.25 short tons per cubic yard (500 lb/yd³) for broken plasterboard thrown loose into a container; published C&D factors run 394-500 lb/yd³. The board itself is roughly twice as dense. A planning figure, not a specification. Confirm the figure with your supplier or waste contractor before relying on it.
What this calculation does not cover
- Paper-faced board takes water up rather than shedding it, and it is light enough that a soaking adds a far bigger share of its own weight than the same rain adds to rubble. Wet board also softens and slumps, so the volume you measured moves as well as the tonnage.
- A stripped partition is not board. The studs and track come down with it and both are lighter in bulk than broken board, so a whole-partition volume overstates the board tonnage — more so again where the wall was insulated. Where gypsum has to be kept out of mixed waste that material is leaving the board container anyway, so split the pile before you measure it.
- Sheet count is the better route only on a strip-out. Counting sheets off a wall against the manufacturer's published weight per sheet skips the density step entirely, but on new boarding the waste is the offcut fraction rather than the sheets, and the same sum returns several times the tonnage that reaches the container. Published weights are for new, dry, unskimmed board, which is not what comes off a wall either.
Estimated cost — your price
This site holds no price list for this material — local prices vary too much to publish honestly. Enter your supplier's price and the result is costed with it.
Computed in your browser — nothing you enter is uploaded. Presented in US customary units and US trade terminology. Where a formula follows a published standard, that standard and its edition are cited beside it on this page; where none governs, the page says so. Local amendments override model codes — verify against the code in force where you build.
Sources checked 2026-08-26 · in the site-wide review of 2026-09-06 · v1.0.0
Regulatory standards & verification citations2
- Typical bulk density used here: approximately 0.25 short tons per cubic yard
- Density varies with moisture, grading and how the material was processed
Cite this page
Your workspace
Most jobs need more than one number. Add the calculators you need next and they open right here, underneath this one — your figures stay on screen and nothing is lost to a page change.
Plasterboard offcuts are among the bulkiest waste streams on a fit-out, and they are light enough that containers fill by volume long before they approach a weight limit. Gypsum also has to be segregated: most jurisdictions require it to be kept out of general mixed waste, because in landfill conditions it can generate hydrogen sulphide. Planning a separate container for board offcuts is therefore a compliance matter as much as an efficiency one.