Heavy Civil & Infrastructure

Dewatering Well Yield Calculator (Dupuit-Forchheimer)

Estimate the steady-state pumping rate a dewatering well can sustain in an unconfined aquifer, using the Dupuit-Forchheimer equation.

  • Answers as you type
  • Every formula cited
  • Calculated in your browser
SettingsSettings for this calculationUS
Market
Imperial · sales tax
The aquifer's hydraulic conductivity.

From a pump test or published typical soil values.

The undisturbed saturated aquifer thickness far from the well.

Measured at the radius of influence, where drawdown is negligible.

The remaining saturated thickness right at the pumping well, after drawdown.

Must be less than h1 — the difference reflects the target drawdown at the well.

The radius at which h1 is measured (often the radius of influence).

See the Wellpoint Dewatering Radius of Influence Calculator.

The radius of the pumping well itself.

The well, not the borehole — though the effective radius is closer to the outside of the filter pack than to the screen, because the pack is permeable and behaves as part of the well. Yield depends on this only logarithmically, which is the practical point: doubling a well's radius buys very little extra flow, so where more water is needed the answer is more wells rather than bigger ones.

Estimated well yield

44.7 gal/min

Medium confidence

This is a steady-state estimate assuming a fully penetrating well in a homogeneous, isotropic unconfined aquifer — real dewatering systems are affected by partial penetration, aquifer boundaries, and non-steady flow, and should be verified with an actual pump test.

Equivalent in m³/day
243.51 m³/day
Equivalent in US gallons per minute
44.67 gpm
Then change the inputs to see how far the answer moves.

Show calculation logic

How this was calculated

Formula source(s)

  • Dupuit-Forchheimer equation for steady radial flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer: Q = pi x K x (h1² − h2²) / ln(r1/r2)

Inputs used

Hydraulic Conductivity (K, m/s)
0
Saturated Thickness at Outer Radius (h1)
33 ft
Saturated Thickness at the Well (h2)
23 ft
Outer Radius (r1)
165 ft
Well Radius (r2)
6 in

Intermediate steps

Equivalent in m³/day
243.51 m³/day
Equivalent in US gallons per minute
44.67 gpm
Final result44.67 gal/min

Confidence note: This is a steady-state estimate assuming a fully penetrating well in a homogeneous, isotropic unconfined aquifer — real dewatering systems are affected by partial penetration, aquifer boundaries, and non-steady flow, and should be verified with an actual pump test.

What this calculation does not cover

  • The equation covers one fully penetrating well pumping on its own. It does not add the drawdown cones of neighbouring wells or wellpoints, so it cannot tell you how many wells an excavation needs or how far apart to set them — in a ring or a line each well delivers less than this figure.
  • Steady state only, in a homogeneous, isotropic, unconfined aquifer. There is no time in the arithmetic, so the higher rate while the cone is still developing and the total volume pumped over the job both sit outside it, as do partial penetration, layered or anisotropic ground, confined and leaky aquifers, and any recharge or no-flow boundary such as a river, a cut-off wall or bedrock.
  • This is a planning-level flow estimate, not a dewatering design and not a pump specification. Screen entrance velocity, filter pack capacity, drawdown available to the pump, suction lift limits, friction losses in the header and discharge run, and standby capacity are all separate calculations, and the yield itself should be confirmed by a pump test before plant is ordered.
  • Nothing here covers the consequences of lowering the water table: settlement of shallow-founded structures and services inside the drawdown cone, migration of fines and piping into the well, or the discharge consent and abstraction licensing the pumped water needs. Where drawdown reaches a neighbour's property, an abstraction, or compressible ground, that is a geotechnical engineer's assessment, not a page of arithmetic.
  • Yield is directly proportional to the hydraulic conductivity you type, and K in natural ground varies by orders of magnitude over short distances and directions. The result carries no uncertainty band around that, and the K box is read as metres per second whichever measurement system the page is set to.

Add the equipment this sizes

This result is a specification — 44.7 gal/min — not a quantity. Put the thing it sizes into your project: how many, what you call it, and your supplier’s price.

330 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

Computed in your browser — nothing you enter is uploaded. Presented in US customary units and US trade terminology. Where a formula follows a published standard, that standard and its edition are cited beside it on this page; where none governs, the page says so. Local amendments override model codes — verify against the code in force where you build.

Sources checked 2026-09-02 · in the site-wide review of 2026-09-06 · v1.0.1

Regulatory standards & verification citations1
  1. Dupuit-Forchheimer equation for steady radial flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer: Q = pi x K x (h1² − h2²) / ln(r1/r2)
Cite this page

Your workspace

Most jobs need more than one number. Add the calculators you need next and they open right here, underneath this one — your figures stay on screen and nothing is lost to a page change.

Now that you have the number

These guides cover the work this quantity is for — the first ones run this calculator inside the section that raises the question.

  • Dewatering an Excavationuses this calculator

    Below the water table you either pump the ground down and pay for it outside your boundary, or hold the hole with head and pay for it in wall.

  • How drawdown volume and pump cycle rate govern every sizing, setting and commissioning decision on a private well water supply.

  • Trench Safety and Supportuses this calculator

    Soil classification is the design input for every trench — it sets the batter, the bench and the shield, and it changes mid-dig more often than crews expect.

Still deciding? Dewatering vs Cut-Off Wall — the factors that actually differ, with no invented prices.

How to calculate dewatering well yield (Dupuit-Forchheimer) in 6 steps

  1. Hydraulic Conductivity (K, m/s)The aquifer's hydraulic conductivity.
  2. Saturated Thickness at Outer Radius (h1)The undisturbed saturated aquifer thickness far from the well.
  3. Saturated Thickness at the Well (h2)The remaining saturated thickness right at the pumping well, after drawdown.
  4. Outer Radius (r1)The radius at which h1 is measured (often the radius of influence).
  5. Well Radius (r2)The radius of the pumping well itself.
  6. Estimated well yieldThe tool computes the estimated well yield from those figures and shows the formula, its sources, and a confidence rating alongside it.

Estimated well yield by saturated thickness at outer radius (h1)

Page defaults, not your figures above.

Saturated Thickness at Outer Radius (h1)Estimated well yield (gal/min)
20 ft0
30 ft29.7
40 ft85.4
50 ft157
60 ft245

Frequently asked questions

What is the Dupuit-Forchheimer equation used for?
It's a classic well hydraulics formula for estimating steady-state groundwater flow to a pumping well in an unconfined aquifer, widely used for early dewatering and water supply well planning.
Why does the answer depend on ln(r1/r2) rather than a simple ratio?
Radial groundwater flow toward a well isn't uniform — flow lines converge, and the logarithmic term correctly captures how the hydraulic gradient increases as flow approaches the well, a signature feature of radial flow problems.
How accurate is this compared to real dewatering performance?
It's a reasonable planning-level estimate for a single well in ideal conditions — real systems (especially well fields with multiple wells) benefit from an actual pump test and, for complex sites, numerical groundwater modeling.
Preliminary estimate, not certified engineering. This tool produces an indicative quantity calculation for planning purposes only — it is not a certified structural analysis, a guaranteed material takeoff, or a substitute for building department approval. Always verify measurements on-site and have a licensed contractor or structural engineer review any load-bearing, code-sensitive, or safety-critical work before purchasing materials or starting construction. Spotted an arithmetic or standards error? Report it to contact@craftquantities.com with your inputs — a confirmed fix gets a permanent check of its own, so the same mistake cannot come back.