What it is called, by market
One concept, four markets. Where a name means something else locally, the card says so rather than leaving you to find out on site.
United Kingdom
No local equivalentengineering brick
also Class A, Class B, blue brick, Staffordshire blue
Defined by BOTH strength and water absorption together — Class A at the higher strength and lower absorption, Class B below it. No American grade combines the two properties this way.
Australia
Close, not identicalengineering brick
also exposure grade, solid brick, class A
EXPOSURE GRADE is the durability classification in Australian practice and is about salt attack and weathering rather than the strength-plus-absorption pair.
United Statesyours
No local equivalent(no direct equivalent)
also SW grade, severe weathering, hard-fired brick, sewer brick
ASTM grades SW, MW and NW classify WEATHERING resistance only. Compressive strength is specified separately, so an American specification has to state both where a British one names a class.
Canada
No local equivalent(no direct equivalent)
also SW grade, severe weathering, clay paver
As the United States under CSA, with severe weathering effectively the default given the freeze-thaw exposure.
The governing standard, by market
United Kingdom
BS EN 771-1 / BS 3921 legacy
Clay masonry units including compressive strength and water absorption, with the Class A and B engineering designations.
United States
ASTM C62 / ASTM C216
Building brick and facing brick, graded SW, MW and NW by weathering exposure with strength specified separately.
Calculators for this
Each works in either measurement system, and the terminology on the page follows whichever market you have selected.
Frequently asked questions
- What actually makes a brick an engineering brick?
- Two numbers together, which is what makes the class untranslatable. British classification sets a minimum compressive strength AND a maximum water absorption, and a brick has to meet both to carry the designation — Class A is the more demanding pair, Class B the less. The combination is the point: strength alone gives you a hard brick that still soaks up water and fails in frost, and low absorption alone gives you a dense brick that may not carry load. American grading splits those properties across two clauses of two different standards, so a specification there names a weathering grade and a compressive strength separately and a reader has to check both. Asking a US supplier for a Class B engineering brick will not produce anything; asking for a minimum strength and an SW grade with a stated absorption limit will.
- Where is an engineering brick actually required?
- Where the masonry is either heavily loaded or permanently wet, and often both. The classic British uses are below the damp-proof course, where the wall is in contact with wet ground and cannot be allowed to wick; in manholes and inspection chambers, where it is wet and occasionally under traffic; in retaining structures; and under a heavy concentrated load such as a beam bearing or a pier. The low absorption is doing the work in the wet cases and the strength in the loaded ones. It is worth knowing the reverse too: engineering brick is a poor choice for a general facing wall built in lime mortar, because a brick far denser than its mortar reverses the sacrificial relationship the wall depends on, which is the same mechanism that makes a cement repair destroy soft brickwork.
- Why does a brick's suction matter as much as its strength?
- Because it decides whether the mortar sets or is robbed. A brick's initial rate of absorption — how fast it draws water out of the mortar it is bedded on — governs the bond between the two. A very absorbent brick laid dry pulls water out of the mortar before it can hydrate, leaving a weak, dusty joint and a bond that fails under the first frost; that is why highly absorbent bricks are wetted before laying. At the other end, a very dense low-absorption brick such as an engineering brick takes almost nothing, so the mortar stays wet, the bricks float on the bed, and a wall built too fast in them slumps. Both failures come from the same property read from opposite ends, and it is why suction is measured and specified rather than judged by eye.
