Heavy Civil & Infrastructure

Reinforced SRW Internal Sliding Check

Sliding factors of safety at each geogrid level of a reinforced segmental wall and at its levelling pad, and the level where the margin is thinnest.

  • Answers as you type
  • Every formula cited
  • Calculated in your browser
SettingsSettings for this calculationUS
Market
Imperial · sales tax
Height of the reinforced mass from the top of the levelling pad to the top of the wall.

Measure the design height, which includes any embedded courses below finished grade. Toe embedment provides passive resistance at the base but does nothing for a sliding plane part way up the wall, which is exactly why the upper levels can govern.

Uniform vertical spacing at which grid layers are placed up the wall.

Spacing normally lands on a whole number of block courses or compaction lifts. Where a design uses variable spacing — closer at the base, wider at the top — run this at the tightest spacing to locate the critical level, then confirm that level by hand against the real layout.

Horizontal length of each grid layer, which is also the width of the reinforced block being checked.

The reinforced mass behaves as a coherent block of this width, so the length that resists sliding is the same length that carries the weight. Truncated or stepped layouts break that assumption and need the sliding plane checked against the actual length at each level.

Average density of the compacted reinforced fill together with the facing units it stands behind.

Facing units are denser than the fill behind them, so a wall with a wide block and a narrow reinforced zone sits above the fill's own figure. Where the two differ materially the honest approach is to weight them by their share of the width rather than to use the fill alone.

Uniformly distributed load carried on the retained soil behind the reinforced zone.

A surcharge behaves very differently from the soil's own weight in this check: it adds to the driving thrust at every level without adding to the mass that resists sliding at any of them, so it hurts the upper levels proportionally more than the base.

Angle of internal friction of the retained soil behind the reinforced zone.

This is the retained soil's property, not the reinforced fill's, and the two are frequently different materials on the same job. A geotechnical report is the proper source; a low value quietly raises the thrust at every level at once.

Coefficient of interaction for sliding along a grid layer, from the manufacturer's direct-shear testing.

A grid layer creates a plane of reduced friction through the fill, and how reduced depends on the aperture geometry and on the fill gradation it was tested against. Test data developed with a well-graded sand does not transfer to an open-graded drainage stone.

Coefficient for sliding of the whole wall across its levelling pad.

This is a block-on-aggregate or block-on-concrete interface and is usually a different number from the grid one. Whether the wall slides at the pad or at a grid layer is decided by which of the two coefficients falls furthest short of the height it has to resist.

Governing sliding factor of safety

1.97 (factor of safety)

Medium confidence

The levelling pad governs: the whole wall slides before any single grid layer does. Levels are numbered from the base upward, and the factor rises as you go up because less mass sits above each successive plane.

Factor of safety against sliding at the levelling pad
1.97 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 1
2.4 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 2
2.71 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 3
3.13 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 4
3.69 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 5
4.5 (factor of safety)
Reinforcement levels in the wall
7 levels
Driving thrust at the governing plane
5,363.05 lbf/ft
Active earth pressure coefficient
0.31 (Ka)
Then change the inputs to see how far the answer moves.

Show calculation logic

How this was calculated

Formula source(s)

  • NCMA Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls sets out the internal stability checks for a geogrid-reinforced SRW, of which sliding of the mass above a reinforcement level is one; connection strength and pullout are separate checks it also requires and this page does not perform
  • Rankine active earth pressure, Ka = tan squared (45 degrees minus phi/2), with thrust on the back of the reinforced mass taken as 0.5 x Ka x gamma x h squared plus Ka x q x h for a uniform surcharge
  • Sliding resistance at a reinforcement level is the weight of the mass above it times a coefficient of interaction from the geogrid manufacturer's direct-shear data — that is a tested interface property, not a soil friction angle, and it is entered here rather than derived

Inputs used

Total Wall Height
15 ft
Vertical Spacing Between Reinforcement Levels
24 in
Reinforcement Length Into the Fill
10.5 ft
Unit Weight of the Reinforced Mass
121.73 pcf
Uniform Surcharge Behind the Wall
250.63 psf
Retained Soil Friction Angle (degrees)
32
Interface Friction Coefficient at the Grid
0.6
Friction Coefficient at the Levelling Pad
0.55

Intermediate steps

Factor of safety against sliding at the levelling pad
1.97 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 1
2.4 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 2
2.71 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 3
3.13 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 4
3.69 (factor of safety)
Factor of safety at reinforcement level 5
4.5 (factor of safety)
Reinforcement levels in the wall
7 levels
Driving thrust at the governing plane
5,363.05 lbf/ft
Active earth pressure coefficient
0.31 (Ka)
Final result1.97 (factor of safety)

Confidence note: The levelling pad governs: the whole wall slides before any single grid layer does. Levels are numbered from the base upward, and the factor rises as you go up because less mass sits above each successive plane.

What this calculation does not cover

  • Sliding only. Connection capacity, grid tensile rupture, pullout beyond the failure surface, bearing and global stability are separate checks this page does not perform.
  • Assumes a level backslope, a uniform surcharge and a single reinforcement length at every level. A broken backslope or a truncated layout changes both the thrust and the resisting mass.
2 ft10.5 ft7 at 2 ft
Schematic, drawn to the proportions you entered — not to scale on screen.

Computed in your browser — nothing you enter is uploaded. Presented in US customary units and US trade terminology. Where a formula follows a published standard, that standard and its edition are cited beside it on this page; where none governs, the page says so. Local amendments override model codes — verify against the code in force where you build.

Sources checked 2026-08-30 · in the site-wide review of 2026-09-06 · v1.0.0

Regulatory standards & verification citations3
  1. NCMA Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls sets out the internal stability checks for a geogrid-reinforced SRW, of which sliding of the mass above a reinforcement level is one; connection strength and pullout are separate checks it also requires and this page does not perform
  2. Rankine active earth pressure, Ka = tan squared (45 degrees minus phi/2), with thrust on the back of the reinforced mass taken as 0.5 x Ka x gamma x h squared plus Ka x q x h for a uniform surcharge
  3. Sliding resistance at a reinforcement level is the weight of the mass above it times a coefficient of interaction from the geogrid manufacturer's direct-shear data — that is a tested interface property, not a soil friction angle, and it is entered here rather than derived
Cite this page

Your workspace

Most jobs need more than one number. Add the calculators you need next and they open right here, underneath this one — your figures stay on screen and nothing is lost to a page change.

Now that you have the number

These guides cover the work this quantity is for — the first ones run this calculator inside the section that raises the question.

Still deciding? Soil Nailing vs Reinforced Soil Wall — the factors that actually differ, with no invented prices.

How to calculate reinforced SRW internal sliding check in 9 steps

  1. Total Wall HeightHeight of the reinforced mass from the top of the levelling pad to the top of the wall.
  2. Vertical Spacing Between Reinforcement LevelsUniform vertical spacing at which grid layers are placed up the wall.
  3. Reinforcement Length Into the FillHorizontal length of each grid layer, which is also the width of the reinforced block being checked.
  4. Unit Weight of the Reinforced MassAverage density of the compacted reinforced fill together with the facing units it stands behind.
  5. Uniform Surcharge Behind the WallUniformly distributed load carried on the retained soil behind the reinforced zone.
  6. Retained Soil Friction Angle (degrees)Angle of internal friction of the retained soil behind the reinforced zone.
  7. Interface Friction Coefficient at the GridCoefficient of interaction for sliding along a grid layer, from the manufacturer's direct-shear testing.
  8. Friction Coefficient at the Levelling PadCoefficient for sliding of the whole wall across its levelling pad.
  9. Governing sliding factor of safetyThe tool computes the governing sliding factor of safety from those figures and shows the formula, its sources, and a confidence rating alongside it.

Governing sliding factor of safety by total wall height

Page defaults, not your figures above.

Total Wall HeightGoverning sliding factor of safety ((factor of safety))
10 ft2.66
15 ft1.97
20 ft1.56
25 ft1.29

Frequently asked questions

Why would a wall slide on a grid layer rather than at its base?
Because a geogrid creates a plane through the fill where friction is lower than the fill's own. If that reduction is severe enough, a plane part way up the wall can be worse off than the pad even though it has less soil pushing on it, and the check has to be run at every level rather than only at the bottom.
Why does the factor of safety fall as you go down the wall?
The driving thrust grows with the square of the height above the plane while the resisting weight grows only linearly with it, so the ratio between them shrinks steadily with depth. That is why the lowest levels are always the ones listed here, and why a wall that passes at level five tells you nothing about level one.
Does the surcharge matter more at the top or the bottom?
Proportionally more at the top. A uniform surcharge adds thrust in proportion to the height above the plane, but it adds nothing at all to the reinforced mass resisting the slide, so it erodes the margin at a shallow plane faster than at a deep one. A wall that only just passes without one can fail at an upper level with it.
Is this enough to design a reinforced wall?
No — sliding is one of several internal checks and none of the external ones. Connection strength at the facing, tensile rupture of the grid, pullout beyond the failure surface, bearing pressure under the mass and global stability through the founding soils all have to be satisfied as well, and the manufacturer's tested data governs several of them.
Preliminary estimate, not certified engineering. This tool produces an indicative quantity calculation for planning purposes only — it is not a certified structural analysis, a guaranteed material takeoff, or a substitute for building department approval. Always verify measurements on-site and have a licensed contractor or structural engineer review any load-bearing, code-sensitive, or safety-critical work before purchasing materials or starting construction. Spotted an arithmetic or standards error? Report it to contact@craftquantities.com with your inputs — a confirmed fix gets a permanent check of its own, so the same mistake cannot come back.